1903 LOUPE ASSISTED VERSUS MICROSCOPICAL VARICOCELECTOMY: DO THEY HAVE INTRAOPERATIVE ANATOMIC DIFFERENCE?
Yan Zhang,Hao Zhang,Xiaopeng Liu,Wen-Tao Huang,Xingxing Ruan,Liaoyuan Li,Xin Gao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.2322
2013-01-01
Abstract:You have accessJournal of UrologyInfertility: Therapy1 Apr 20131903 LOUPE ASSISTED VERSUS MICROSCOPICAL VARICOCELECTOMY: DO THEY HAVE INTRAOPERATIVE ANATOMIC DIFFERENCE? Yan Zhang, Hao Zhang, Xiaopeng Liu, Wen-Tao Huang, Xingxing Ruan, liaoyuan Li, and Xin Gao Yan ZhangYan Zhang Guangzhou, China, People's Republic of More articles by this author , Hao ZhangHao Zhang Guangzhou, China, People's Republic of More articles by this author , Xiaopeng LiuXiaopeng Liu Guangzhou, China, People's Republic of More articles by this author , Wen-Tao HuangWen-Tao Huang Guangzhou, China, People's Republic of More articles by this author , Xingxing RuanXingxing Ruan Guangzhou, China, People's Republic of More articles by this author , liaoyuan Liliaoyuan Li Guangzhou, China, People's Republic of More articles by this author , and Xin GaoXin Gao Guangzhou, China, People's Republic of More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.2322AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Several papers reported that microscopical varicocelectomy was superior than loupe assisted varicocele repair. However, in the same spermatic cord, the intraoperative anatomic detail difference between them is still unclear. METHODS Between April 2011 and August 2011, 26 men with 33 sides grade 2-3 varicocele were enrolled in this study. One surgeon firstly performed the open inguinal varicocelectomy under 3.5 × loupe magnification; the presumed vascular channels and lymphatics were isolated and marked respectively without ligation any of them. Another surgeon then microsurgically dissected and checked the same spermatic cord with operating microscope to judge the results in terms of the ligation of the internal spermatic veins, the preservation of the arteries and lymphatics. At last, all the internal spermatic veins were ligated microsurgically. RESULTS There were significant differences in the average number of internal spermatic arteries (1.51 v.s. 0.97), internal spermatic veins (5.70 v.s. 4.39) and lymphatics (3.52 v.s. 1.61) between microscope and loupe assisted procedure (P<0.001, P<0.001, P<0.001, respectively). Meanwhile, in varicocele repair with loupe magnification, an average of 1.30±1.07 (43/33) internal spermatic veins per side were missed (among them, 1.12±0.93 (37/33) overlooked internal spermatic veins were adherent to the preserved testicular artery), the number of 0.55±0.79 lymphatics and 0.36±0.55 arteries were to be ligated.A total of 5 internal spermatic arteries and an average number of 1.67±1.43 lymphatics were neither identified nor ligated in varicocelectomy using magnifying loupe. In addition, in 1 case the vasal vessels were to be ligated in this approach. CONCLUSIONS Loupe magnification is very useful in open varicocele repair; but microscopical varicocelectomy could preserve more internal spermatic arteries, lymphatics, and ligate more veins than loupe assisted procedure. To some degree loupe magnification is inadequate for the reliable identification and dissection of the tiny vessels of the spermatic cord, most of the overlooked veins were adherent to the preserved testicular artery. However, further control study is needed to compare the clinical outcome. © 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 189Issue 4SApril 2013Page: e780 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Yan Zhang Guangzhou, China, People's Republic of More articles by this author Hao Zhang Guangzhou, China, People's Republic of More articles by this author Xiaopeng Liu Guangzhou, China, People's Republic of More articles by this author Wen-Tao Huang Guangzhou, China, People's Republic of More articles by this author Xingxing Ruan Guangzhou, China, People's Republic of More articles by this author liaoyuan Li Guangzhou, China, People's Republic of More articles by this author Xin Gao Guangzhou, China, People's Republic of More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...