Predicting Reactivity and Passivation of Solid-State Battery Interfaces

Eder G. Lomeli,Brandi Ransom,Akash Ramdas,Daniel Jost,Brian Moritz,Austin D. Sendek,Evan J. Reed,Thomas P. Devereaux

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-bdp43

2024-04-22

Abstract:In this work, we build a computationally inexpensive, data-driven model that utilizes only atomistic structure information to predict the reactivity of interfaces between any candidate solid-state electrolyte material and a Li metal anode. This model is trained on data from ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations of the time evolution of the solid electrolyte-Li metal interface for 67 different materials. Predicting the reactivity of solid state interfaces with ab initio techniques remains an elusive challenge in materials discovery and informatics, and previous work on predicting interfacial compatibility of solid-state Li-ion electrolytes and Li metal anodes has focused mainly on thermodynamic convex hull calculations. Our framework involves training machine learning models on AIMD data, thereby capturing information on both kinetics and thermodynamics, and then leveraging these models to predict the reactivity of thousands of new candidates in the span of seconds, avoiding the need for additional weeks-long AIMD simulations. We identify over 300 new chemically stable and over 780 passivating solid-electrolytes that are predicted to be thermodynamically unfavored. Our results indicate many potential solid-state electrolyte candidates have been incorrectly labeled unstable via purely thermodynamic approaches using density functional theory (DFT) energetics, and that the pool of promising, Li-stable solid-state electrolyte materials may be much larger than previously thought from screening efforts. To showcase the value of our approach, we highlight two borate materials that were identified by our model and confirmed by further AIMD calculations to likely be highly conductive and chemically stable with Li: LiB13C2 and LiB12PC.

Chemistry

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper focuses on the application of solid electrolytes in solid-state batteries, particularly the reactivity and stability issues at the lithium metal anode interface. Currently, the evaluation of interface stability relies mainly on thermodynamic calculations, which may overlook kinetic factors. The research team has established a data-driven model based on atomic structure information and used molecular dynamics simulation data to predict the reactivity of the solid electrolyte-lithium metal interface for 67 different materials. This model can rapidly predict the stability of thousands of new materials without requiring time-consuming molecular dynamics simulations.

The study found that many materials previously considered unstable may actually remain stable or exhibit passivation behavior at high temperatures, indicating that relying solely on thermodynamic stability criteria may mistakenly exclude some potential candidate materials. The model predicted more than 300 chemically stable and 780 potentially passivating solid electrolytes, which are thermodynamically unfavorable. The paper also emphasizes that considering thermodynamic stability alone is insufficient and that kinetic information needs to be combined to more accurately assess interface stability.

Additionally, the researchers identified two borate materials (LiB13C2 and LiB12PC) that may have high conductivity and chemical stability with lithium metal, which were further validated through additional molecular dynamics calculations. The results of the paper suggest that the potential pool of solid electrolyte materials may be much larger than what existing screening methods suggest.

In summary, this paper proposes a new prediction framework that considers kinetics to improve the evaluation of solid electrolyte interface stability in solid-state batteries, aiding in future material screening and the development of solid-state batteries.