Responses to the Main Critiques of the Bypass Versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL)-2 Trial

Matthew A. Popplewell,Andrew W. Bradbury
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2023.11.056
IF: 1.5
2024-01-01
Annals of Vascular Surgery
Abstract:The Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL)-1 trial randomised 452 participants with chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI) to either infra-inguinal surgical bypass (SB) (around 75% vein bypass [VB], 25% prosthetic) or plain balloon angioplasty (PBA). In those participants who survived for two years, randomisation to SB was associated with significantly better overall survival (OS), and a trend towards improved amputation free survival (time to death from any cause, or time to first major, above ankle, amputation, whichever occurred first, AFS) [1].
What problem does this paper attempt to address?