Clinical Outcomes Following Femoro-Popliteal Angioplasty for Severe Limb Ischaemia (SLI) Are Worse Now (2009-2014) Than They Were in the Basil-1 Trial (1999-2004)

Lewis Meecham,Smitaa Patel,Gareth Bate,Mathew Popplewell,Andrew W. Bradbury
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.06.653
IF: 6.427
2019-01-01
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Abstract:Introduction - Despite the only available level 1 evidence (from the UK NIHR HTA- funded BASIL-1 trial, B-1) showing superior outcomes from bypass, in recent years, there has been an increasing trend towards treating patients with severe limb ischaemia (SLI) due to femoro-popliteal (FP) disease by angioplasty+/-stenting. This is frequently justified by claiming the results of endovascular revascularisation (ER) are likely to be significantly better now than in 1999-2004, when B-1 patients were randomised. Our objective was to compare clinical outcomes in 218 patients randomised to FP ER in B-1 with those observed in 100 (the first and last 50) patients undergoing FP ER at a UK academic vascular unit 2009-2013 (Contemporary Series, CS). Methods - Individual patient data were obtained from prospectively gathered computerised B-1 and CS databases. Median (range) follow-up was 3.4 (0-7.5) and 3.3 (0-6.9) years for B-1 and CS respectively. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS version 9.4. Results - Patients were well matched in terms of mean (range) age years (B1: 73 (46-96) vs CS: 76 (53-98), gender (male = 54% vs 46%), and other baseline variables. Clinical outcomes in B-1 were significantly better in terms of amputation free survival (AFS, 54% vs 45%, HR=0.69, 95% CI: 0.50-0.95, p=0.02); limb salvage (LS, 84% vs 73%, HR=0.57, 95% CI: 0.34-0.95, p=0.03) and overall survival (OS, 63% vs 52%, HR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.48-0.97, p=0.03). Conclusion - Despite claims that clinical outcomes from FP ER have improved, AFS, LS and OS were significantly better in B-1 (1999-2004) than in a CS (2009-2013). Data from further on-going randomised controlled trials (BASIL-2, BASIL-3 and BEST-CLI) are urgently needed to better define the role of ER in the management of SLI.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?