Pore-scale Permeability Estimation of Undisturbed Granite Residual Soil: A Comparison Study by Different Methods

Yun Que,Xian Chen,Zhenliang Jiang,Peichen Cai,Bin Xue,Xiudong Xie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-024-03745-6
IF: 3.5361
2024-01-01
Journal of Soils and Sediments
Abstract:The macropore structure and seepage characteristics profoundly influence the stability of granite residual soil (GRS) slopes. However, accurately predicting the permeability of undisturbed GRS (U-GRS) is challenging owing to its complex and susceptible pore structure. Employing X-ray computed tomography (CT) technologies, a three-dimensional (3D) pore structure of U-GRS, was established. Permeability prediction for U-GRS samples was conducted using three simulation methods, namely, the pore network model (PNM), finite element method (FEM), and the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM), along with two empirical models (EMs)—specifically, Kozeny–Carman (K–C) and Katz–Thompson (K–T) models. Subsequently, the methods were comparatively analyzed for calculating efficiency and accuracy. Finally, a piecewise permeability prediction model (PPPM) for U-GRS based on the CT-LBM was proposed. The ranking of permeability estimation methods in terms of accuracy was as follows: LBM > PNM > FEM > EMs. Substantial disparity was observed in the permeabilities obtained using both FEM and EMs compared to other methods, which exhibited a deviation of up to six orders of magnitude. The PPPM demonstrated smaller prediction deviations than the EMs, with its accuracy influenced by the strategy for selecting calculation parameters. The CT-LBM, which uses real pore structures, was employed to estimate the permeability of U-GRS. The PPPM, established based on this method, was found to be applicable for estimating U-GRS permeability.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?