Abstract:A rapidly growing literature on lying in behavioral economics and psychology shows that individuals often do not lie even when lying maximizes their utility. In this work, we attempt to incorporate these findings into the theory of mechanism design. We consider players that have a preference for truth-telling and will only lie if their benefit from lying is sufficiently larger than the loss of the others. To accommodate such players, we introduce $\alpha$-moral mechanisms, in which the gain of a player from misreporting his true value, comparing to truth-telling, is at most $\alpha$ times the loss that the others incur due to misreporting. We develop a theory of moral mechanisms in the canonical setting of single-item auctions. We identify similarities and disparities to the standard theory of truthful mechanisms. In particular, we show that the allocation function does not uniquely determine the payments and is unlikely to admit a simple characterization. In contrast, recall that monotonicity characterizes the allocation function of truthful mechanisms. Our main technical effort is invested in determining whether the auctioneer can exploit the preference for truth-telling of the players to extract more revenue comparing to truthful mechanisms. We show that the auctioneer can extract more revenue when the values of the players are correlated, even when there are only two players. However, we show that truthful mechanisms are revenue-maximizing even among moral ones when the values of the players are independently drawn from certain identical distributions. As a by product we get an alternative proof to Myerson's characterization in the settings that we consider. We flesh out this approach by providing an alternative proof to Myerson's characterization that does not involve moral mechanisms whenever the values are independently drawn from regular distributions.

Synthesizing Efficient Social Laws Based on Algorithmic Mechanism Design.

Mechanism Design for Social Law Synthesis under Incomplete Information

Synthesizing Optimal Social Laws for Strategical Agents Via Bayesian Mechanism Design

A Bayesian Optimal Social Law Synthesizing Mechanism for Strategical Agents

Mechanism Design with Exchangeable Allocations

Resolving social dilemmas with minimal reward transfer

Relationship Design for Socially-Aware Behavior in Static Games

A Mechanism Design Approach for Multi-Party Machine Learning

Socially efficient mechanism on the minimum budget

Bayesian Algorithmic Mechanism Design

Designing Equilibria in Concurrent Games with Social Welfare and Temporal Logic Constraints

Mechanism Design for Multi-Party Machine Learning

Mechanism Design with Moral Bidders

Mechanism Design for Resource Allocation: with Applications to Centralized Multi-Commodity Routing

Mechanism Design Powered by Social Interactions

Automated Design of Affine Maximizer Mechanisms in Dynamic Settings

Learning Payment-Free Resource Allocation Mechanisms

Cost-Recovering Bayesian Algorithmic Mechanism Design

New directions in mechanism design

Social Media and Misleading Information in a Democracy: A Mechanism Design Approach