Enhancing and Evaluating the Seismic Resilience of Steel Frame Structures Based on the Stiffness-Flexibility Indicator

Yinzhen Chen,Mingming Jia,Dagang Lu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.108546
IF: 4
2024-01-01
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Abstract:The dynamic characteristics of buildings inherently exhibit significant variations. However, there is currently limited research focusing on assessing the inherent differences in building characteristics for seismic resilience and developing strategies to enhance seismic resilience in response to these variations. The Stiffness-Flexibility Indicator (SFI), determined by structural height and fundamental period, quantifies the stiffness and flexibility properties of buildings. These properties affect seismic displacement and acceleration responses, leading to diverse post-earthquake consequences. The study focuses on two types of steel frames: rigid frame (RF) and flexible frame (FF), also known as uncontrolled steel frames. Adhering to the seismic resilience evaluation code (GB/T 38591–2020), the evaluation encompasses time history analysis considering design basis earthquakes (DBEs) and maximum considered earthquakes (MCEs). The findings indicate that RF exhibits smaller inter-story drift and higher floor acceleration response, whereas FF demonstrates the opposite behavior. To address disparities in displacement and acceleration, specific seismic control strategies were implemented. Viscous dampers were employed to mitigate the seismic response of RF, while rocking trusses were utilized to control the FF's behavior. The effectiveness of these controlled steel frames, denoted as RFVD (RF with Viscous Damper) and FFRT (FF with Rocking Truss), was evaluated through a comprehensive analysis of seismic resilience. This assessment highlighted the association between the SFI and three factors: repair costs, time allocation, and personnel losses related to structural and non-structural components. Leveraging the SFI allows engineers in practical engineering applications to directly select targeted seismic resilience enhancement measures based on the seismic displacement and acceleration response characteristics of structures. This approach enables them to quantitatively assess the seismic resilience level using the straightforward procedures outlined in GB/T 38591–2020. Consequently, seismic design with a resilience-oriented focus can be achieved, aligning with the goals of resilient urban construction.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?