Letter by Jin-Shan and Xue-Bin Regarding Article, “Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest: an Underlying Reversible Cause”

He Jin-Shan,Xuebin Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.117.030851
IF: 37.8
2017-01-01
Circulation
Abstract:We read with great interest the case presented by Robert and colleagues 1 about pulseless electric activity (PEA) that shows the importance of interpreting the ECG and finding the cause of PEA in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.We have 2 questions about this case.First, PEA can be the result of a wide spectrum of potential causes, including significant hypoxia, profound acidosis, severe hypovolemia, tension pneumothorax, electrolyte imbalance, drug overdose, sepsis, large myocardial infarction, massive pulmonary embolism, cardiac tamponade, hypoglycemia, hypothermia, and trauma. 2 PEA is defined as myocardial electric activity without associated mechanical activity and can be classified as pseudo-PEA and true PEA. 3 Pseudo-PEA is a profound state of cardiogenic shock that is inadequate to maintain perfusion pressure and thus a nondetectable pulse.As for the patient in this case, his heart can still contract normally, but as a result of the compression of pneumothorax, there is not enough blood returning back to the left ventricle and being pumped out.Is this pseudo-PEA instead of true PEA?Second, pseudo-PEA rhythms are often narrow QRS complex tachycardias; true PEAs are usually seen at a slow ventricular rate with a wide QRS complex.This patient's ECG reveals a rhythm that is not strictly regular, without a visible P wave, and with a frequency of 60 bpm and a QRS interval of 150 milliseconds.Why is his electrocardiographic performance in accordance with true PEA but he is classified as pseudo-PEA?We hope to learn more about this case from your answers.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?