A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Low Dose Imipramine for Treatment of Refractory Functional Dyspepsia (FD)

Justin C. Wu,Pui Kuan Cheong,Yawen Chan,Larry H. Lai,Jessica Ching,Angie Chan,Joseph J.Y. Sung,Francis K.L. Chan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5085(11)60200-x
IF: 29.4
2011-01-01
Gastroenterology
Abstract:to assess dose response.Funnel plot analysis was performed to test for publication bias.Results: Systematic review identified 3,403 citations.Detailed evaluation identified 18 potentially relevant journal articles/abstracts, of which 5 fulfilled our inclusion criteria.Of the 1803 IBS patients randomized, 96% had non-constipated IBS.Meta-analysis of data from 5 studies demonstrated that rifaximin was superior to placebo for global symptom improvement (p=0.0038,see table ).Raw data was available from 4 studies for the secondary endpoint of bloating.For this endpoint, the response rate with rifaximin was significantly higher than with placebo (p<0.0001).Based on data from 4 studies, rifaximin significantly reduced abdominal pain scores compared to placebo.Data from 3 studies demonstrated that rifaximin significantly improved stool consistency compared to placebo.A logistic regression model showed no linear trend for a dose response.Funnel plot analysis revealed no evidence of publication bias.The most common AEs (≤10%) with rifaximin were headache, upper respiratory infection, urinary tract infection, nausea, vomiting, & diarrhea which were similar to placebo.Serious AEs with rifaximin were rare (<2%) and similar to placebo.There were no confirmed reports of C. difficile associated diarrhea.Conclusion: In high quality studies, rifaximin was more effective than placebo at improving global symptoms and bloating in patients with IBS.Rifaximin was well tolerated in short term trials.Efficacy and safety data beyond 10 weeks of therapy are not available.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?