Randomised clinical trial: Faecal microbiota transplantation for irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea

Yuk Kam Yau,Qi Su,Zhilu Xu,Whitney Tang,Jessica Y L Ching,Joyce Wing Yan Mak,Chun Pan Cheung,Matthew Fung,Margaret Ip,Paul Kay Sheung Chan,Justin Che Yuen Wu,Francis Ka Leung Chan,Siew C Ng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17703
Abstract:Background: Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been shown to improve symptoms in a proportion of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Aim: We performed a randomised trial to assess the efficacy of FMT in patients with IBS. Methods: We randomised 56 patients with diarrhoea-predominant IBS 1:1 to FMT or placebo via the duodenal route at baseline and week 4. The primary outcome was > 50 points decrease in IBS severity scoring system (IBS-SSS) score at week 12. Secondary outcomes were improvement in bloating and change in gut microbiota at week 12. After 12-week follow-up, those in the placebo group were assigned to receive open-label FMT. Results: At week 12, 57.1% in the FMT group and 46.4% in the placebo group achieved the primary endpoint (p = 0.42). More patients receiving FMT than placebo had improvement in bloating (72% vs 30%; p = 0.005). In an open-label extension, 65.2% and 82.4% of patients achieved, respectively, the primary endpoint and improvement in bloating. Faecal microbiome of patients in the FMT group showed a reduction in bacteria like Ruminococcus gnavus and enrichment of bacteria such as Lawsonibacter at week 12, while no change in the placebo group. Functional analyses showed that the hydrogen sulphide-producing pathway decreased in patients who had FMT (p < 0.05) accompanied by a reduction in contributing bacteria. There were no serious adverse events related to FMT. Conclusion: FMT performed twice at an interval of four weeks did not significantly reduce IBS-SSS score. However, more patients had improvement in abdominal bloating, which was associated with a reduction in hydrogen sulphide-producing bacteria. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03125564).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?