Seven Years of Recent European Net Terrestrial Carbon Dioxide Exchange Constrained by Atmospheric Observations

Wouter Peters,Maarten Krol,Guido R. van der Werf,Sander Houweling,Chris D. Jones,John Hughes,Kevin Schaefer,K. A. Masarie,A. R. Jacobson,J. B. Miller,C. H. Cho,Michel Ramonet,Martina Schmidt,L. Ciattaglia,Francesco Apadula,Daniela Heltai,Frank Meinhardt,Alcide di Sarra,Salvatore Piacentino,Damiano Sferlazzo,Tuula Aalto,Juha Hatakka,Johan Ström,László Haszpra,H. A. J. Meijer,S. van der Laan,R. E. M. Neubert,Andrew Jordan,Xavier Rodó,Josep-Antón Morguí,Alex Vermeulen,María Elena Popa,Kazimierz Różański,Mirosław Zimnoch,Andrew C. Manning,Markus Leuenberger,Chiara Uglietti,Han Dolman,Philippe Ciais,Martin Heimann,Pieter P. Tans
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02078.x
IF: 11.6
2010-01-01
Global Change Biology
Abstract:We present an estimate of net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of CO 2 in Europe for the years 2001–2007. It is derived with a data assimilation that uses a large set of atmospheric CO 2 mole fraction observations (∼70 000) to guide relatively simple descriptions of terrestrial and oceanic net exchange, while fossil fuel and fire emissions are prescribed. Weekly terrestrial sources and sinks are optimized (i.e., a flux inversion) for a set of 18 large ecosystems across Europe in which prescribed climate, weather, and surface characteristics introduce finer scale gradients. We find that the terrestrial biosphere in Europe absorbed a net average of −165 Tg C yr −1 over the period considered. This uptake is predominantly in non‐EU countries, and is found in the northern coniferous (−94 Tg C yr −1 ) and mixed forests (−30 Tg C yr −1 ) as well as the forest/field complexes of eastern Europe (−85 Tg C yr −1 ). An optimistic uncertainty estimate derived using three biosphere models suggests the uptake to be in a range of −122 to −258 Tg C yr −1 , while a more conservative estimate derived from the a‐posteriori covariance estimates is −165±437 Tg C yr −1 . Note, however, that uncertainties are hard to estimate given the nature of the system and are likely to be significantly larger than this. Interannual variability in NEE includes a reduction in uptake due to the 2003 drought followed by 3 years of more than average uptake. The largest anomaly of NEE occurred in 2005 concurrent with increased seasonal cycles of observed CO 2 . We speculate these changes to result from the strong negative phase of the North Atlantic Oscillation in 2005 that lead to favorable summer growth conditions, and altered horizontal and vertical mixing in the atmosphere. All our results are available through http://www.carbontracker.eu
What problem does this paper attempt to address?