Constraining biospheric carbon dioxide fluxes by combined top-down and bottom-up approaches

Samuel Upton,Markus Reichstein,Fabian Gans,Wouter Peters,Basil Kraft,Ana Bastos
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2555-2024
IF: 6.3
2024-02-29
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Abstract:While the growth rate of atmospheric CO 2 mole fractions can be measured with high accuracy, there are still large uncertainties in its attribution to specific regions and diverse anthropogenic and natural sources and sinks. A major source of uncertainty is the net flux of carbon dioxide from the biosphere to the atmosphere, the net ecosystem exchange (NEE). There are two major approaches to quantifying NEE: top-down approaches that typically use atmospheric inversions and bottom-up estimates that rely on process-based or data-driven models or inventories. Both top-down and bottom-up approaches have known strengths and limitations. Atmospheric inversions (e.g., those used in global carbon budgets) produce estimates of NEE that are consistent with the atmospheric CO 2 growth rate at regional and global scales but are highly uncertain at smaller scales. Bottom-up data-driven models based on eddy-covariance measurements (e.g., FLUXCOM) match local observations of NEE and their spatial variability but have difficulty in accurately upscaling to a reliable global estimate.
environmental sciences,meteorology & atmospheric sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?