Rivastigmine Patch in Chinese Patients with Probable Alzheimer's Disease: A 24‐week, Randomized, Double‐Blind Parallel‐Group Study Comparing Rivastigmine Patch (9.5 Mg/24 H) with Capsule (6 Mg Twice Daily)

Zhenxin Zhang,Zhen Hong,Yanping Wang,Li He,Ning Wang,Zhao Zhi-gang,Gang Zhao,Lei Shang,Marianne Weisskopf,Francesca Callegari,Christine Strohmaier
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cns.12521
2016-01-01
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
Abstract:To compare the once-daily rivastigmine patch 9.5 mg/24 h (10 cm(2) ) versus twice-daily capsule (12 mg/day) in Chinese patients with probable Alzheimer's disease (AD) (mini-mental state examination [MMSE] scores of 10-20).The primary objective was to demonstrate the noninferiority of patch to capsule in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) change from baseline to 24 week. Secondary endpoints included cognition (MMSE), overall clinical response (Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change [ADCS-CGIC]), activities of daily living (Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living [ADCS-ADL]), behavior (Neuropsychiatric Inventory [NPI-12]), and safety.Similar cognitive improvement was observed in both patch (n = 248) and capsule (n = 253) groups. Statistical noninferiority for ADAS-Cog was not established (least-square means difference, 0.1; 95% confidence interval, -1.2; 1.5). Considering all efficacy parameters into account, both treatments showed similar performance at Week 24. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were lower for patch (39.7%) compared with capsule (49.8%). Application site pruritus was reported in 10.9% of patients receiving patch; most cases were mild. Gastrointestinal AEs including nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea occurred less frequently in the patch group (15.8% vs. 28.7%).Rivastigmine patch 9.5 mg/24 h is effective and well tolerated in Chinese patients with probable AD.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?