Sixteen-Week Interventional Study to Evaluate the Clinical Effects and Safety of Rivastigmine Capsules in Chinese Patients with Alzheimer's Disease.

Jianping Jia,Yong Ji,Tao Feng,Qinyong Ye,Dantao Peng,Weihong Kuang,Yuping Ning,Zhihou Liang,Dongsheng Fan,Wenshi Wei,Yansheng Li,Shifu Xiao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-190791
2019-01-01
Abstract:Background: Rivastigmine is a cholinesterase inhibitor, approved for the treatment of mild-to-moderate dementia of Alzheimer's type. Objective: To explore the efficacy and safety of the maximal tolerated dose of rivastigmine capsules in Chinese patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods: The study was a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase IV clinical study in mild-to-moderate drug-naive AD patients treated with rivastigmine capsules. The primary endpoint was the changes in the total scores of Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) from baseline to week 16. Secondary endpoints included changes in the scores of the following assessment scales and safety: Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study; Activities of Daily Living; Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE); Neuropsychiatry Index (NPI), and Caregiver Burden Inventory. Results: 222 patients were enrolled. Of these, 136 (75.1%) patients received and maintained the effective dose (>= 6 mg/d) of rivastigmine for at least 4 weeks. The ADAS-Cog scale score improved in rivastigmine-treated patients at week 16 compared with baseline (p < 0.001) by 2.0 (95% CI: -3.0 to -1.1) points, which met the pre-defined superiority criteria. NPI-10 and NPI-12 scores improved by 3.6 and 4.0 points at week 16 (p = 0.001, p < 0.001), respectively. A total of 107 patients (59.1%) experienced adverse effects (AEs) during the study; common AEs included nausea (20.5%), vomiting (16.6%), anorexia (7.8%), dizziness (7.7%), and diarrhea (7.2%). Conclusion: This was the first phase IV study on rivastigmine in mainland China. The study preliminarily demonstrated that rivastigmine capsules showed good tolerability and efficacy in mild-to-moderate AD patients with the maximal tolerated dose.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?