Analysis of the Efficacy and Risk Factors of Surgical Treatment of Recurrent UPJO in Adults.
Wenzhi Gao,Lei Zhang,Yuhui He,Tai Tian,Zhihua Li,Liangliang Bai,Ying Shen,Chen Huang,Bing Wang,Peng Zhang,Ninghan Feng,Xuechao Li,Yuexian Guo,Xuesong Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-022-03439-3
IF: 2.2662
2022-01-01
International Urology and Nephrology
Abstract:Background To compare the efficacy of secondary pyeloplasty and balloon dilation and to analyze the risk factors for secondary surgical failure in patients with recurrent uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). Methods We retrospectively analyzed 65 patients with recurrent UPJO who underwent secondary surgery between September 2011 and March 2019, of whom 33 had complete baseline data and follow-up data. General clinical information, perioperative data, and follow-up results were collected from patients. Risk factors for surgical failure in patients with recurrent UPJO were analyzed using logistic regression. Results The failure rates of secondary pyeloplasty and balloon dilation in secondary surgery were 16.7% and 33.3%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that ureteral stenosis length and operative time were associated with secondary pyeloplasty and balloon dilatation failure ( p < 0.05), and ureteral stenosis length was an independent risk factor for secondary pyeloplasty failure (OR = 0.074, 95% CI: 0.006–0.864, p = 0.038). In the balloon dilation group, treatment failure rates were significantly lower in patients with stenotic segment lengths less than 1 ± 0.32 cm than in patients with stenotic segment lengths greater than 1 ± 0.32 cm ( p = 0.019). Conclusions The secondary pyeloplasty may provide better benefit. Ureteral stricture length is an independent risk factor for failure of secondary pyeloplasty and a potential risk factor for balloon dilatation. Operation time is a potential risk factor for pyeloplasty and balloon dilatation.