Abstract:This paper explains the existence of a financial intermediary based on its advantages over firms in designing low market risk debt securities and high market risk equity securities when markets are incomplete. The firm's objective in the model is to choose a financial structure in order to maximize the value of its securities. When markets are complete, the value of a firm's securities is independent of how they are structured or sold. When markets are incomplete and investors have heterogenous risk preferences, as assumed in this model, it is possible to increase the total value of securities by choosing the optimal mix of debt and equity, as shown by Allen and Gale (1988). In this paper the option for firms to set up a financial intermediary is introduced. It is then shown that it is possible to further increase the value of securities by delegating security design to a financial intermediary. This means that firms sell their securities to a financial intermediary who then builds a pool of securities and chooses the optimal structure of debt and equity for refinancing. It is assumed that investors are either risk-averse or risk neutral; firms' returns are imperfectly correlated; investors can fully diversify at no costs; firms and investors have the same information and expectations about the future; markets are incomplete in two regards: 1) state-contingent securities that purely reflect market risk or diversifiable risk do not exist, 2) investors cannot issue securities. The main result of this paper is that a financial intermediary may arise endogenously as constituent of the optimal financial structure a firm can choose when markets are incomplete. A financial intermediary can create a large pool of assets and, based on the law of large numbers, design equity securities that reflect purely market risk and design debt securities that reflect purely diversifiable risk. In other words, a financial intermediary can make market risk and diversifiable risk separately contractible. A single firm can not do this and will therefore delegate security design to a financial intermediary if this implies an increase in value of its securities that is above its delegation costs. The optimal financial structure in this model depends on risk-characteristics of firms, risk preferences of investors and firms' costs for delegating security design. This paper adds to theories on financial intermediation that are based on transaction costs and asymmetric information.

Security Price Informativeness with Delegated Traders

An Experimental Research on Information Efficiency of Securities Markets

A Strategic Asset Pricing Model for Relative Performance Concern

Market efficiency, informational asymmetry and pseudo-collusion of adaptively learning agents

Asset Prices when Agents Are Marked-to-Market

Competitive Trading and Endogenous Learning of Asymmetrically Informed Investors

Informed Trading in Parallel Auction and Dealer Markets : An Analysis on the London Stock Exchange

Transparency and market efficiency: A study of adaptive learning with asymmetric information

Price Delegation or Not? the Effect of Heterogeneous Sales Agents

Specific Information and Delegation

Information-Based Trading

Discretionary liquidity trading, information production and market efficiency

Financial Intermediation and Delegated Security Design

Sophisticated investors and market efficiency: Evidence from a natural experiment

Delegated Portfolio Management, Optimal Fee Contracts, and Asset Prices

Information-Based Stock Trading, Executive Incentives, and the Principal-Agent Problem

Strategic Informed Trading and the Value of Private Information

Price Impact Under Heterogeneous Beliefs and Restricted Participation

AI-Powered Trading, Algorithmic Collusion, and Price Efficiency

To Trade or Not to Trade: the Effect of Broker Search and Discretionary Trading on Securities Market Performance

Emergence of information aggregation to rational expectations equilibria in markets populated by biased heuristic traders