Informed Trading in Parallel Auction and Dealer Markets : An Analysis on the London Stock Exchange

Pankaj K. Jain,Christine Jiang,Thomas H. McInish
2003-01-01
Abstract:In this paper, we examine whether there is more informed trading in an anonymous market than in a non-anonymous market. It is widely believed that institutional traders prefer to trade in an anonymous environment, whereas market markers in a non-anonymous setting protect themselves by diverting informed trades to other trading venues. We conduct our analysis by using the unique institutional characteristics of the London Stock Exchange where an anonymous electronic order book market (SETS) operates alongside a non-anonymous voluntarily dealer market. We measure asymmetric information using metrics based on both trade flow (PIN) and priceimpact. Whereas PIN is equal on the markets, our evidence regarding the price impact of trades shows strong support for the ability of dealers to identify informed order flow. The permanent price impact of trades is significantly lower on the Dealer market than on SETS suggesting that informed traders do not benefit a lot from dealers. We also find that the Dealer market can compete effectively with SETS for uninformed order flow. Institutions also appear to prefer trading with dealers as most large trades are routed to the Dealer market and such sizes are not obtainable on SETS. Finally, we show that the temporary price impact of trades on the Dealer market is significantly larger than on SETS, indicating that liquidity for large trades, can be acquired on the Dealer market, but it comes at a considerable cost.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?