Re: Baek Et Al.: Development of Topographic Scoring System for Identifying Glaucoma in Myopic Eyes: a Spectral-Domain OCT Study (ophthalmology. 2018;125:1710-1719)

Caixia Sun,Jin Shen,Yuanzhi Yuan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.11.021
IF: 14.277
2019-01-01
Ophthalmology
Abstract:We read the article by Baek et al1Baek S.U. Kim K.E. Kim Y.K. et al.Development of topographic scoring system for identifying glaucoma in myopic eyes.Ophthalmology. 2018; 125: 1710-1719Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (12) Google Scholar with great interest. The authors formulated a scoring system based on topographic diagnostic parameters of spectral-domain OCT to differentiate glaucomatous neuropathy from healthy myopic eyes. The findings of the study are noteworthy, although the study design could be more rigorous. In the study by Baek et al, the diagnosis of glaucomatous neuropathy was based on the consensus of 2 independent observers. When the 2 observers disagreed, those participants were labeled as ambiguous and then excluded from the analysis. However, the study validity may be threatened by leaving the ambiguous participants out of the study. First, after dropping the ambiguous participants, the study included only typical myopic glaucoma patients and otherwise healthy myopes, which virtually became a case-control design. The typical cases are more easily detected, which would overestimate sensitivity of the scoring system. Whereas for the unambiguous healthy myopic controls, they are less likely misdiagnosed, which would increase the specificity of the system. In other words, the marked contrasts between the cases and the healthy controls could inflate the estimates of diagnostic accuracy.2Rutjes A.W. Reitsma J.B. Di Nisio M. et al.Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies.CMAJ. 2006; 174: 469-476Crossref PubMed Scopus (463) Google Scholar Therefore, the diagnostic performance of the scoring system would have been exaggerated to some extent in this study. Second, the external validity or generalization of the study findings could be compromised because only a selected sample was studied. Ideally, a diagnostic accuracy study should include a sample population with an appropriately broad spectrum of diseases. Selecting a representative sample, for example, a consecutive or random series, ensures not only the fair evaluation of the diagnostic performance, but also the applicability of the scoring system in everyday clinical settings.3Cohen J.F. Korevaar D.A. Altman D.G. et al.STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration.BMJ Open. 2016; 6e12799Crossref PubMed Scopus (979) Google Scholar It is challenging to diagnose glaucomatous optic disc damage in a myopic conus, as noted by the authors.1Baek S.U. Kim K.E. Kim Y.K. et al.Development of topographic scoring system for identifying glaucoma in myopic eyes.Ophthalmology. 2018; 125: 1710-1719Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (12) Google Scholar Nevertheless, when the ambiguous cases were excluded from the study, the applicability of the scoring system may be jeopardized substantially. Development of Topographic Scoring System for Identifying Glaucoma in Myopic Eyes: A Spectral-Domain OCT StudyOphthalmologyVol. 125Issue 11PreviewTo develop a new scoring system that uses topographic diagnostic signs of spectral-domain (SD) OCT to enhance glaucoma diagnostic performance for myopic eyes and to validate the system’s diagnostic ability. Full-Text PDF ReplyOphthalmologyVol. 126Issue 5PreviewWe appreciate Sun et al for their interest in our article.1 The main focus of their comments was the relevance of our study population and possible bias in evaluating diagnostic accuracy in such a study population. We would like to expand our discussion in response to the comments raised by Sun et al. Full-Text PDF
What problem does this paper attempt to address?