An Analysis of Quantitative Measurements of Drainage Exudate Using Negative Suction in 96 Microtia Ear Reconstructions

Zhicheng Xu,Ruhong Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/plastic-surgery.1000772
2012-01-01
Plastic Surgery
Abstract:D ue to its complex, three-dimensional morphology, auricular recon- struction remains one of the most challenging procedures in reconstructive surgery.A successful auricular reconstruction demonstrates good comparability in accentuated contour, which relies mostly on tight contact between the skin flap and the implanted cartilage framework.A negative suction drainage system provides a simple, safe and consistent approach to achieving a smooth contour in auricular reconstruction.In previous studies (1-3), a single tube, or two silicone drains and disposable syringes, have been successfully used in ear reconstruction procedures as a negative suction drainage system.To date, few reports have focused on quantitative measurement of negative suction and its relationship to disposed time, patient age or microtia type, all of which are very important to negative suction regulation.The aim of the present study was to carefully record the volume of suction exudate from 96 microtia patients and determine whether relationships among patient age, microtia type and postoperative time exist. MethodsA total of 96 microtia patients, ranging in age from six to 26 years, underwent reconstruction using autogenous costal cartilage between 2007 and 2010.Fifty-eight cases were right sided, 36 cases were left sided and two cases were bilateral.Seventy-seven patients were male and 19 were female.According to accepted microtia classifications, 61 cases were lobular and 35 were concha type.Forty-two patients were children between six and 12 years of age, 27 adolescents were between 13 and 17 years of age and the remaining 27 patients were adults (Table 1).The sixth, seventh and eighth costal cartilages were harvested from the contralateral chest according to the method of Tanzer (4), and modified using the Brent (5) and Nagata (6-8) techniques.The sixth and seventh costal cartilages were used for reconstruction of the base frame, while the eighth costal cartilage was used to construct the helix and crus helicis.The assembled cartilage framework was then placed
What problem does this paper attempt to address?