Behavioural Pharmacology: 40+ Years of Progress, with a Focus on Glutamate Receptors and Cognition
Trevor W. Robbins,Emily R. Murphy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2006.01.009
IF: 17.638
2006-01-01
Trends in Pharmacological Sciences
Abstract:Behavioural pharmacology is an interdisciplinary field at the intersection of several research areas that ultimately lead to the development of drugs for clinical use and build understanding of how brain functions enable cognition and behaviour. In this article, the development of behavioural pharmacology in the UK is briefly surveyed, and the current status and success of the field is highlighted by the progress in our understanding of learning and memory that has resulted from discoveries in glutamate receptor pharmacology allied to theoretical and methodological advances in behavioural neuroscience. We describe the original breakthrough in terms of the role of NMDA receptors in hippocampal-mediated spatial learning and long-term potentiation, and review recent advances that demonstrate the involvement of glutamate receptor in working memory, recognition memory, stimulus–response learning and memory, and higher cognitive functions. We also discuss the unique functions of NMDA receptors and the fundamental role of AMPA receptors in processes that are common to some of these forms of memory, including encoding, consolidation and retrieval. Behavioural pharmacology is an interdisciplinary field at the intersection of several research areas that ultimately lead to the development of drugs for clinical use and build understanding of how brain functions enable cognition and behaviour. In this article, the development of behavioural pharmacology in the UK is briefly surveyed, and the current status and success of the field is highlighted by the progress in our understanding of learning and memory that has resulted from discoveries in glutamate receptor pharmacology allied to theoretical and methodological advances in behavioural neuroscience. We describe the original breakthrough in terms of the role of NMDA receptors in hippocampal-mediated spatial learning and long-term potentiation, and review recent advances that demonstrate the involvement of glutamate receptor in working memory, recognition memory, stimulus–response learning and memory, and higher cognitive functions. We also discuss the unique functions of NMDA receptors and the fundamental role of AMPA receptors in processes that are common to some of these forms of memory, including encoding, consolidation and retrieval. Behavioural pharmacology (or psychopharmacology) is at a practical interface between the discovery of a novel pharmacological agent that acts on the CNS and the assessment of its utility, whether clinically as a therapeutic agent or for analytical purposes in psychology and neuroscience. Consequently, it is important to use precise methods for assessing and interpreting the effects of drugs on behaviour in humans and experimental animals. Adequate preclinical screening of drugs by pharmaceutical companies is essential for selecting candidates for expensive Phase II and III clinical trials. Furthermore, appropriately measuring behaviour is vital to test speculative hypotheses about the consequences of neuronal plasticity based on the effects of drugs observed in cultured tissue slices or the consequences of genetic manipulations for a particular neurotransmitter receptor. Behavioural pharmacology must thus be an integral component of many neuroscience research programmes. In this article, we review briefly the origins of behavioural pharmacology in the UK and as a particular example of its success show how it has been instrumental in understanding more precisely the role of glutamate as a neurotransmitter in the processes of neuronal plasticity, with particular reference to learning and memory. Behavioural pharmacology has flourished in the UK and worldwide, although it has evolved in several directions from different intellectual precursors and disciplines. The field derives from influences in pharmacology, psychiatry, neuroscience, ethology and several different traditions in psychology, each driven by a set of goals unique to the discipline. One of the main origins of behavioural pharmacology in the UK is work carried out in the Department of Pharmacology at University College London in the 1950s and 1960s. During this time, Roger Russell, the then Head of Department, encouraged Hannah Steinberg, in collaboration with Ian Stolerman and the late R. ‘Channi’ Kumar, to base their research programme on the behavioural effects of mixtures of stimulants and barbiturates in addition to opiates in experimental animals. Another major, but different, approach came from the field of psychiatry, where figures such as Max Hamilton and Alex Coppen had an interest in the treatment and aetiology of depression and other forms of mental illness. Hamilton constructed influential clinical scales for assessing both depression and anxiety in humans that are used today in evaluating the therapeutic efficacy of novel pharmacological agents. Both of these influences differed markedly from the development of behavioural pharmacology in the USA, which arose from a fusion of classic pharmacology and Skinnerian ‘operant’ psychology, as exemplified by the Harvard Medical School laboratory founded by Peter Dews, Roger Kelleher and Bill Morse. Although Harvard Medical School exerted an enormous influence over the methods used in the UK, in the late 1960s and early 1970s the late Jeffrey Gray at Oxford University and Susan Iversen at Cambridge University introduced two novel approaches to enrich behavioural pharmacology, the former depending on animal learning theory [1Gray J.A. The Neuropsychology of Anxiety. Oxford University Press, 1982Google Scholar], and the latter depending on a fusion between neuropsychology, neurochemistry and traditional behavioural pharmacology [2Iversen S.D. Iversen L.L. Behavioural Pharmacology.2nd Edn. Oxford University Press, 1981Google Scholar]. Both approaches focused on the study of how drugs worked on defined neural systems, using powerful behavioural paradigms; these advances continue to influence the work of current researchers. Iversen's move to the Merck, Sharp and Dohme Neuroscience Centre at Terlings Park, Harlow, UK is just one example of how academic scientists moving to the pharmaceutical sector enabled the application of evolving psychopharmacological methodology to the evaluation of new compounds. A landmark international CIBA symposium, ‘Animal Behaviour and Drug Action,’ held in London in 1963 and published a year later [3Steinberg, H. et al., eds (1964) Animal Behaviour and Drug Addiction, J&A Churchill LtdGoogle Scholar], contained several contributions from British psychopharmacology that reflected some of these origins. Reviewing the various contributions now, it is notable how contemporary many of the themes discussed at the meeting remain today. There were several chapters on the influence of drugs on memory (Jarvik) and learning (Bures and Russell), in addition to other current foci of research interest such as pharmacological interactions with frontal lobe functioning (Weiskrantz), amphetamine and neural reward mechanisms (Stein), and pharmacogenetics (Broadhurst). Furthermore, an entire section of the meeting was devoted to the relevance of the behavioural effects of drugs in animals and humans, thus presaging the current emphasis on translational neuroscience. What has changed since then? Many of the fundamental conceptual questions have remained the same, although they have become much more refined as a result of major advances in theory and methodology in experimental psychology and major discoveries (e.g. new neurotransmitter systems and multiplicities of novel receptor mechanisms) in neuropharmacology. Although learning and memory were important topics in the CIBA symposium and behavioural pharmacologists had begun to work out how best to study these functions, a possible role for glutamate in learning and memory was largely unsuspected. However, Jeffrey Watkins and colleagues (Bristol, UK) were, at that time, investigating the possible role of glutamate as a neurotransmitter [4Curtis D.R. et al.Chemical excitation of spinal neurones.Nature. 1959; 183: 611-612Crossref PubMed Scopus (188) Google Scholar], which had been a controversial issue since Hayashi's initial observations [5Hayashi T. Effects of sodium glutamate on the nervous system.Keio J. Med. 1954; 3: 183-192Crossref Scopus (171) Google Scholar] that central infusions of glutamate produced convulsions in experimental animals. In a recent review, Watkins [6Watkins J.C. I-Glutamate as a central neurotransmitter: looking back.Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2000; 28: 297-309Crossref PubMed Google Scholar] charts the stages by which glutamate gradually passed the stringent criteria for being a neurotransmitter substance, including structural and stereochemical specificity for actions at defined receptors, presynaptic release during axonal activity, the presence of an inactivation mechanism and the effect of specific antagonists on the production of excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) by glutamate and the excitatory potential of the presumed neurotransmitter. Arguably the most impressive of all indications suggesting that glutamate is a neurotransmitter, however, came from behavioural pharmacology studies that demonstrated an intimate association between glutamate receptors and neuronal plasticity and complex behavioural functions, including learning and memory. These studies are reviewed here. The anti-epileptic agent MK801 (dizocilpine), with a hitherto unknown mechanism of action, was first discovered to be a non-competitive antagonist at NMDA receptors by the UK Merck group at Terlings Park [7Wong E.H.F. et al.The anticonvulsant MK-801 is a potent N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonist.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1986; 83: 7104-7108Crossref PubMed Scopus (1679) Google Scholar] and was one of the many tools that became available from pharmaceutical companies in the 1980s for the study of the role of glutamate receptors in learning. This topic has thus been a prime example of the crucial and sustained contributions of academic and industrial behavioural pharmacologists and neuroscientists in the UK in what is now an increasingly collaborative, international enterprise. In the search for new drugs, this research field is now being linked to the modelling of hitherto pathologically elusive clinical disorders, including Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia, in addition to less-obvious examples such as general anxiety disorder and drug addiction. A key breakthrough in understanding the neural basis of learning has been the realization that there are different types of memory subserved by different neural systems. Thus, there is a declarative form of long-term memory for episodes and facts that appears to be mediated mainly by structures of the medial temporal lobe. Other forms of memory, such as perceptuo-motor skills and some forms of Pavlovian and instrumental learning (including stimulus–response habits) (see Glossary) appear to devolve to several structures such as the motor cortex, dorsal and ventral striatum, and cerebellum [8Squire L.R. Memory and Brain. Oxford University Press, 1987Google Scholar]. By contrast, information that is used for only a short time and has to be kept ‘online’ for that purpose requires ‘working memory’ processes that implicate the prefrontal cortex, certain areas of the posterior cortex and the hippocampus [9Goldman-Rakic P.S. Circuitry of primate prefrontal cortex and regulation of behavior by representational memory.in: Plum F. Handbook of Physiology. American Physiological Society, 1987: 373-417Google Scholar]. However, although these dissociable forms of memory imply different forms of information processing in different brain regions, they might nevertheless be mediated by similar cellular and molecular mechanisms. Thus, it is increasingly appreciated that neuronal plasticity processes represented by cellular phenomena such as long-term potentiation (LTP) [and also long-term depression (LTD)] might underlie different forms of learning and memory. The neuropharmacology of LTP itself is complex and beyond the scope of this article but it is known to depend crucially on glutamate-mediated transmission. Classically, blockade of the NMDA subtype of glutamate receptors blocks LTP in slice preparations, as originally observed by the British neuropharmacologist Graham Collingridge while working with Hugh McLennan and colleagues [10Collingridge G.C. et al.J. Physiol. 1983; 334: 33-46PubMed Google Scholar, 11Bliss T.V. Collingridge G.L. A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus.Nature. 1993; 361: 31-33Crossref PubMed Scopus (9607) Google Scholar] However, the salient observation for behavioural pharmacology, discovered by Richard Morris and colleagues at Edinburgh, was that blockade of NMDA receptors also inhibited certain forms of learning, at comparable doses of the NMDA receptor antagonist to those that inhibited LTP. Thus, Morris and colleagues [12Morris R.G. et al.Selective impairment of learning and blockade of long-term potentiation by an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, AP5.Nature. 1986; 319: 774-776Crossref PubMed Scopus (2781) Google Scholar] showed that intracerebroventricular infusion of d-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (AP-5), a competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, selectively impaired spatial learning in a water-maze escape task known to depend on the integrity of the hippocampus, but did not affect visual learning in the same maze. The remarkable observation was that this treatment did not have any effects on already established performance, indicating the effects were not obviously dependent on ancillary processes such as motivation, sensory perception or motor function. This selectivity of effect on task acquisition implies a direct action on associative learning mechanisms. The basic findings of the seminal study by Collingridge and McLennan have been substantiated by many subsequent demonstrations of impaired learning following manipulation of hippocampal NMDA receptors, whether by pharmacological experiments (generally employing rats) or genetic means (using mice). For example, Young and colleagues [13Young S.L. et al.NMDA process mediates anterograde amnesia of contextual fear conditioning induced by hippocampal damage: immunization against amnesia by context pre-exposure.Behav. Neurosci. 1994; 108: 19-29Crossref PubMed Scopus (218) Google Scholar] showed that NMDA receptor blockade in the hippocampus impaired the normal learning of associations between an environmental setting or context and an electric shock (‘contextual fear’). Although it was initially thought that there might be a special relationship between NMDA receptors and spatial or contextual learning that is dependent on the hippocampus, other studies quickly showed that the effects of NMDA receptor blockade on learning were more general and implicated both other neural structures and other behavioural assays. For example, deficits in the acquisition of both fear conditioning and appetitive conditioning to discrete stimuli in rats (i.e. approach to food-predictive cues) were shown to depend on NMDA receptors within the amygdala [14Burns L.H. et al.Intra-amygdala infusion of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist AP5 impairs acquisition but not performance of discriminated approach to an appetitive CS.Behav. Neural Biol. 1994; 61: 242-250Crossref PubMed Scopus (53) Google Scholar, 15Miserendino M.J.D. et al.Blocking of acquisition but not expression of conditioned fear- potentiated startle by NMDA antagonists in the amygdala.Nature. 1990; 345: 716-718Crossref PubMed Scopus (668) Google Scholar]. A form of stimulus–response learning that is dependent on the dorsal striatum (approaching cues that are predictive of reward) has also been shown to depend on NMDA receptors [16Packard M.G. Teather L.A. Double dissociation of hippocampal and dorsal-striatal memory systems by posttraining intracerebral injections of 2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid.Behav. Neurosci. 1997; 111: 543-551Crossref PubMed Scopus (144) Google Scholar], and Dalley and colleagues [17Dalley J.W. et al.Time-limited modulation of appetitive Pavlovian memory by D1 and NMDA receptors in the nucleus accumbens.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005; 102: 6189-6194Crossref PubMed Scopus (184) Google Scholar] recently showed that the consolidation of appetitive approach behaviour to a conditioned stimulus predictive of food delivery was similarly dependent on NMDA (in addition to dopamine D1) receptors in the ventral striatum. Furthermore, DiCiano and colleagues [18Di Ciano P. et al.Differential involvement of NMDA, AMPA/Kainate, and dopamine receptors in the nucleus accumbens core in the acquisition and performance of Pavlovian approach behavior.J. Neurosci. 2001; 21: 9471-9477PubMed Google Scholar] showed that NMDA receptor antagonism in the core of the nucleus accumbens impaired acquisition of approach behaviour, whereas AMPA receptor antagonism impaired performance by disrupting discriminated approach. This growing catalogue of learning and memory deficits following NMDA receptor blockade has prompted several questions: what precise aspects of learning and memory are impaired, what is the role of other glutamate receptors (such as the AMPA subtype, which mediates fast depolarization by glutamate neurons, a prerequisite to NMDA receptor activation), and what therapeutic significance do these findings hold? For example, would it be feasible to enhance rather than impair learning or memory by manipulating glutamate-mediated transmission? New discoveries in behavioural pharmacology, enabled by the development of highly specific glutamatergic agents [19Kew J.N. Kemp J.A. Ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptor structure and pharmacology.Psychopharmacology (Berl.). 2005; 179: 4-29Crossref PubMed Scopus (596) Google Scholar], are beginning to answer these questions. The issue of which component of memory might be impaired concerns the processes implicated in initial encoding, later consolidation and storage, and the subsequent retrieval of the memory trace. These factors can be interrogated using so-called ‘one-trial’ memory tasks where (Figure 1) the agent of interest can be administered either before or just after initial learning and its effects on memory retrieval assessed by a subsequent retention test, possibly several days or more later. An agent that is only effective for a limited time-interval after training is said to affect consolidation rather than initial encoding of the trace. The agent can also be administered just before retention to test possible effects on memory retrieval (in addition to so-called ‘state-dependent’ effects, where the state change produced by the drug potentially acts as a memory-retrieval cue). Thus, the effects of blockade of NMDA receptors and other subtypes of glutamate receptors on different stages of memory can be determined. In one-trial ‘place memory’ tests, NMDA receptor blockade disrupted encoding and consolidation of the memory, but not retrieval [20Bast T. et al.Distinct contributions of hippocampal NMDA and AMPA receptors to encoding and retrieval of one-trial place memory.J. Neurosci. 2005; 25: 5845-5856Crossref PubMed Scopus (113) Google Scholar]. Some of these effects were delay dependent, in the sense that they varied with the delay to the retention test, with greater deficits at long retention intervals [21Steele R.J. Morris R.G. Delay-dependent impairment of a matching-to-place task with chronic and intrahippocampal infusion of the NMDA-antagonist D-AP5.Hippocampus. 1999; 9: 118-136Crossref PubMed Scopus (487) Google Scholar]. A similar pattern of findings has been found for learned fear of contexts [22Kim J.J. et al.Selective impairment of long-term but not short-term conditional fear by the N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist APV.Behav. Neurosci. 1992; 106: 591-596Crossref PubMed Scopus (133) Google Scholar]. This implies that NMDA receptors have a selective role in the processes by which initially encoded events are made more permanent in long-term memory. By contrast, blockade of AMPA and kainate receptors with a selective antagonist such as LY326325 (see Chemical names) disrupts not only encoding but also consolidation and retrieval of spatial memories, showing that fast synaptic transmission via AMPA receptors is required more generally for all of these processes [23Riedel G. et al.Reversible neural inactivation reveals hippocampal participation in several memory processes.Nat. Neurosci. 1999; 2: 898-905Crossref PubMed Scopus (406) Google Scholar]. This selectivity of the role of NMDA compared with AMPA receptors has subsequently been demonstrated for some other forms of memory mediated by the hippocampus, such as event-place associations in the rat, which are more readily linked to the forms of episodic memory deficits that are shown by patients with Alzheimer's disease. In this example, rats were trained to associate flavours with particular places where they had found those flavours in single episodes (or trials). Again, blockade of NMDA receptors within the hippocampus impaired encoding but not retrieval of the flavour–place associations, whereas blockade of AMPA receptors using CNQX (6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione) disrupted encoding and retrieval [24Day M. et al.Glutamate-receptor-mediated encoding and retrieval of paired-associate learning.Nature. 2003; 424: 205-209Crossref PubMed Scopus (219) Google Scholar]. Parallel studies using an ingenious test of memory consolidation based on non-spatial, socially transmitted food preferences also shows that NMDA receptors are not simply implicated in spatial encoding, but are also implicated in non-spatial aspects of ‘declarative’ learning [25Roberts M. Shapiro M. NMDA receptor antagonists impair memory for nonspatial, socially transmitted food preference.Behav. Neurosci. 2002; 116: 1059-1069Crossref PubMed Scopus (26) Google Scholar].Chemical namesHA966:(+)-3-amino-1-hydroxypyrrolid-2-oneLY326325:(3RS,4aRS,6RS,8aRS)-6-[2-(1(2)H-tetrazole-5-yl)ethyl]decahydro-isoquinoline-3-carboxylic acid HA966:(+)-3-amino-1-hydroxypyrrolid-2-oneLY326325:(3RS,4aRS,6RS,8aRS)-6-[2-(1(2)H-tetrazole-5-yl)ethyl]decahydro-isoquinoline-3-carboxylic acid Most recently, the involvement of NMDA and AMPA receptors has been demonstrated in another aspect of memory – the ability to recognize objects, which is markedly impaired in Alzheimer's disease. There is now strong evidence that object recognition is more dependent on a specific region of the medial temporal lobe, the perirhinal cortex, than on the hippocampus [26Meunier M. et al.Effects on visual recognition of combined and separate ablations of the entorhinal and perirhinal cortex in rhesus monkeys.J. Neurosci. 1993; 13: 5418-5432PubMed Google Scholar, 27Murray E.A. Bussey T.J. Perceptual-mnemonic functions of the perirhinal cortex.Trends Cogn. Sci. 1999; 3: 142-151Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (390) Google Scholar]. Recently, Winters and Bussey [28Winters B.D. Bussey T.J. Glutamate receptors in perirhinal cortex mediate encoding, retrieval, and consolidation of object recognition memory.J. Neurosci. 2005; 25: 4243-4251Crossref PubMed Scopus (190) Google Scholar] have capitalized on this functional localization by administration of infusions of selective NMDA and AMPA receptor antagonists into the perirhinal cortex in rats at varying stages of performance of a visual object-recognition task. In this test, rats are allowed to interact with and explore a novel object before experiencing that now-familiar object again at a later time in conjunction with another object. Recognition memory can be inferred by the relative proportion of time the rats spend exploring the familiar and novel objects during a retention test carried out either a short or a longer time following the original presentation of the first object. The authors found that NMDA receptor blockade (using AP-5) impaired long- but not short-term object-recognition memory when infused before encoding the initial object (Figure 2a). This result suggests that NMDA receptors within the perirhinal cortex are not necessary for the initial perceptual encoding of the object but are required for the induction of synaptic plasticity required for the long-term storage of its trace. Moreover, NMDA receptor blockade soon after experience of the initial object also inhibited its subsequent recognition, showing that NMDA receptors are directly implicated in memory consolidation (Figure 2b). By contrast, NMDA receptor blockade immediately before the retention test had no effects on recognition memory, whereas AMPA receptor blockade (via CNQX) did disrupt retrieval, which parallels the findings for spatial memory in the hippocampus. AMPA receptor blockade also deleteriously affected all three stages of memory: encoding, consolidation and retrieval (Figure 2c). Thus, it appears that there is considerable generality in the glutamate mechanisms that mediate memory across not only domains (i.e. the nature of the memories), but also common memory processes, such as consolidation (Table 1).Table 1Involvement of NMDA and AMPA receptors in cognitive functionsaSymbols: (−), pharmacological antagonism; (+), direct or indirect agonism; (KO), genetic knockout model; ↑, function is improved; ↓, function is impaired; −, function is not affected., bSome effects are mediated in specific brain areas; see main text for details.Visual recognitionSpatial learningDeclarative memoryNMDA (−)AMPA (−)NMDA (−)AMPA (−)Encoding−↓−↓Consolidation↓↓↓↓Retrieval−↓−↓Appetitive and aversive conditioningExtinctionAssociative conditioningNMDA (−)AMPA (−)NMDA (−)NMDA (+)AMPA (−)Acquisition (encoding/consolidation)↓−↓↑−Performance (retrieval)−↓cDiscriminated approach to appropriate stimulus disrupted; a generalized deficit.Executive functionsNMDA (−)AMPA (−)AMPA (KO)Working memory↓↓dLow systemic doses impair performance only at long retention intervals.↓Discrimination learning↓XeGeneralized cognitive disruption.a Symbols: (−), pharmacological antagonism; (+), direct or indirect agonism; (KO), genetic knockout model; ↑, function is improved; ↓, function is impaired; −, function is not affected.b Some effects are mediated in specific brain areas; see main text for details.c Discriminated approach to appropriate stimulus disrupted; a generalized deficit.d Low systemic doses impair performance only at long retention intervals.e Generalized cognitive disruption. Open table in a new tab Another way of defining the roles of glutamate receptor subtype function in memory is to employ mutant mice with targeted genetic deletions. Thus, evidence from mice that lack the AMPA receptor subunit A (GluRA/GluR1) supports the role of fast synaptic transmission in working memory functions, as measured in a delayed alternation paradigm where the mice simply have to remember which arm they last visited in a T maze [29Schmitt W.B. et al.A within-subjects, within-task demonstration of intact spatial reference memory and impaired spatial working memory in glutamate receptor-A-deficient mice.J. Neurosci. 2003; 23: 3953-3959PubMed Google Scholar]. The striking aspect of these data was that these mice were relatively unimpaired in a spatial task requiring longer-term memory and NMDA receptor involvement in the hippocampus, suggesting that different neuronal mechanisms within the hippocampus contribute to different (although probably interactive) types of information processing. One possible explanation for these possibly paradoxical results, given the normal close functional interdependence of NMDA and AMPA receptors, is that the targeted subunit deletion does not impair the function of the entire population of AMPA receptors such that NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic plasticity could be activated by a GluRA-independent mechanism. In previous studies, NMDA receptors had been implicated in spatial working memory functions in rodents, based on behavioural pharmacological evidence [21Steele R.J. Morris R.G. Delay-dependent impairment of a matching-to-place task with chronic and intrahippocampal infusion of the NMDA-antagonist D-AP5.Hippocampus. 1999; 9: 118-136Crossref PubMed Scopus (487) Google Scholar, 30Tonkiss J. Rawlins J.N. The competitive NMDA antagonist AP5, but not the non-competitive antagonist MK801, induces a delay-related impairment in spatial working memory in rats.Exp. Brain Res. 1991; 85: 349-358Crossref PubMed Scopus (54) Google Scholar]. The explosion in knowledge about the nature of the glutamate receptors involved in learning and memory and the regulation of glutamate-mediated transmission begs the question of how such information might be used to develop new agents for improving memory and cognitive function [19Kew J.N. Kemp J.A. Ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptor structure and pharmacology.Psychopharmacology (Berl.). 2005; 179: 4-29Crossref PubMed Scopus (596) Google Scholar]. The rather specific effects of NMDA receptor agents on the processes that link encoding to consolidation might encourage the further testing of this hypothesis by postulating selective enhancements with agonists. However, this strategy is weakened by the likelihood of serious side-effects (e.g. epilepsy and neurotoxicity) as a result of surplus activity of glutamate receptors. Some grounds for optimism are provided by effects reported on long-term memory recall in human volunteers by ‘AMPA-kine’ drugs that enhance excitatory glutamate transmission via their actions as positive allosteric modulators of the AMPA receptor [31Lynch G. Memory enhancement: the search for mechanism-based drugs.Nat. Neurosci. 2002; 5: 1035-1038Crossref PubMed Scopus (147) Google Scholar]. Additionally, interest has focused on partial agonists that facilitate N
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
-
Physiologically informed neuromodulation
Karen Wendt,Timothy Denison,Gaynor Foster,Lothar Krinke,Alix Thomson,Saydra Wilson,Alik S Widge
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2021.120121
2022-03-15
Abstract:The rapid evolution of neuromodulation techniques includes an increasing amount of research into stimulation paradigms that are guided by patients' neurophysiology, to increase efficacy and responder rates. Treatment personalisation and target engagement have shown to be effective in fields such as Parkinson's disease, and closed-loop paradigms have been successfully implemented in cardiac defibrillators. Promising avenues are being explored for physiologically informed neuromodulation in psychiatry. Matching the stimulation frequency to individual brain rhythms has shown some promise in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Matching the phase of those rhythms may further enhance neuroplasticity, for instance when combining TMS with electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings. Resting-state EEG and event-related potentials may be useful to demonstrate connectivity between stimulation sites and connected areas. These techniques are available today to the psychiatrist to diagnose underlying sleep disorders, epilepsy, or lesions as contributing factors to the cause of depression. These technologies may also be useful in assessing the patient's brain network status prior to deciding on treatment options. Ongoing research using invasive recordings may allow for future identification of mood biomarkers and network structure. A core limitation is that biomarker research may currently be limited by the internal heterogeneity of psychiatric disorders according to the current DSM-based classifications. New approaches are being developed and may soon be validated. Finally, care must be taken when incorporating closed-loop capabilities into neuromodulation systems, by ensuring the safe operation of the system and understanding the physiological dynamics. Neurophysiological tools are rapidly evolving and will likely define the next generation of neuromodulation therapies.
-
Cognition: the Ultimate Brain Function
Trevor W. Robbins
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2010.171
2011-01-01
Neuropsychopharmacology
Abstract:This fourth issue of Neuropsychopharmacology Reviews focuses on cognition, the ultimate function of the brain. Arguably, most, if not all, of the major neuropsychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia, depression, and anxiety are cognitive in nature. Increasingly, it is realized that symptoms such as delusions and hallucinations, as well as other motivational and emotional signs, may have important cognitive elements. These arise, for example, from aberrant learning and associative factors, impaired attributional systems, and deficient control processes that are recruited to regulate emotional outputs and inappropriate behavioral responses. In general, cognition refers to those, sometimes mysterious, covert processes that have to be inferred from behavior. Cognitive processes include seemingly miraculous products of modular processing to produce, for example, representational knowledge such as language, and mechanisms that intervene between stimulus and response, often in a ‘top-down' or ‘executive' manner to mediate and resolve competition between what are often autonomous neurocognitive systems. Deficits in such cognitive processes as working memory are now acknowledged to be important factors in their own right that determine the likelihood of rehabilitation in disorders such as schizophrenia, and this has led to recent initiatives of the National Institute of Health such as the MATRICS project on the measurement and remediation of cognitive functions for the purpose of clinical trials (Green, 2007). Moreover, the state of psychiatric genetics is helping us to realize that the accurate definition of phenotype, and the corollary identification of cognitive endophenotypes, is a vital aim in any program that seeks to understand the genetic basis of psychopathology. Great advances in cognitive neuroscience over the past two decades, aided by technological innovations in several modalities of brain imaging, as well as increased sophistication in computational theory and cognitive psychology, have inspired psychopharmacologists and biological psychiatrists alike to characterize the properties of candidate cognition-modifying compounds, beneficial or otherwise. In this Special Issue, we have tried to capture some of the excitement of this burgeoning area of research, and how it may inspire future advances in the field, with an emphasis on translational strategies. We have focused on current hot-spots of debate and potential growth areas by commissioning well-refereed reviews (often entailing novel collaborations) that either complement one another or stand apart, like beacons, to inspire new discovery. We have chosen not to re-review areas where recent authoritative pieces have removed the need (eg, the role of noradrenergic mechanisms (eg, Arnsten, 2009)). The result is a collection of 16 substantial reviews sequenced to highlight their most obvious inter-relationships. The series begins with a review by Coull et al that uniquely synthesizes neuropsychopharmacological and neuroimaging evidence from human and animal studies on timing—a fundamental and yet intangible process that permeates and underlies most cognitive functions. Kenemans and Kahkonen help us to appreciate the potential of contemporary methods in human electrophysiology, including magnetoencephalography, which have the necessary precision and temporal resolution to illuminate attentional and response preparatory processes and how they are altered by psychoactive drugs. Many such effects arise from drugs affecting monoaminergic systems and so we have covered the important advances accruing from analyses of the monoaminergic and cholinergic systems. Thus, Hasslemo and Sarter review progress in understanding the role of cholinergic systems in attentional and memory processes at a mechanistic level. Several articles then converge on the implications of remarkable advances in understanding the roles and modes of the central dopamine projections that may inspire the resolution of similar questions about the role of the 5-HT systems. Articles by Boureau and Dayan, and Cools et al both illustrate the advantages of combining new approaches in computational and imaging neuroscience to gain fresh and complementary perspectives on such classical issues of putative unitary functions and opponency of these monoaminergic systems. Rogers shows how such analyses may inform our understanding of decision-making processes in humans and Frank and Fossella introduce a pharmacogenetic perspective, again with emphasis on monoaminergic systems. Possible clinical applications of advances in understanding of cortico-limbic circuitry under neuromodulatory control are then covered by two contrasting chapters on cognition in depression. One (by Elliott et al) covers the implications of new discoveries about reward systems and emotional regulation and the other (by Pizzagalli) identifies, through meta-analysis, a possible neuroendophenotype for treatment of depression based on hyperactivity of the rostral anterior cingulate cortex, which is then interpreted in the context of other elements of this circuitry and their purported cognitive functions. The next article (by Volkow et al) provides perhaps the best evidence relating to possible cognitive enhancement, mainly through stimulant medications in the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The great interest in cognitive enhancing drugs, relevant, for example, to programs in schizophrenia, is then reviewed from the perspective of animal studies of memory and executive function (by Floresco and Jentsch) before Hardt and Nadel provide a stimulating and timely update on theoretical advances in understanding memory systems, especially for episodic memory. The last decade has seen enormous advances in revealing how glutamatergic processes affect plasticity and learning and this is represented here by a survey of the fascinating processes underlying extinction, their susceptibility to manipulation through glutamatergic drugs and the novel implications for clinical treatment of such conditions as anxiety and addiction (by Myers et al). Corlett et al illustrate another side of the NMDA receptor coin: the imaginative use of the ketamine model of psychosis in humans to understand the cognitive and neural basis of delusional phenomena. Lesh et al then review the characterization of cognitive deficits in schizophrenia from a particular theoretical position that emphasizes impairments in cognitive control processes. We look forward to the next issue of Neuropsychopharmacology Reviews with its clinical and applied themes, by reviewing a vital element of clinical trials—the neurocognitive basis of the placebo effect (by Benedetti et al). Last, but by no means least, these substantial reviews are highlighted by an extraordinarily stimulating set of ‘hot topics', which help to fill in the gaps of our inevitably incomplete coverage (and definitely enable us to say we have considered both ‘hot' and ‘cold' cognition!). It has been a privilege to edit this Special Issue and I would like to pay tribute to the efforts of the authors, referees, as well as my co-editing colleagues Peter Kalivas, Gwenn Smith, Kathryn Cunningham, and Diane Drexler.
-
Pharmacological treatment in behavioural medicine: the importance of neurochemistry, molecular biology and mechanistic hypotheses
K L Overall
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/tvjl.2001.0568
Abstract:Psychopharmacology has become a popular, and sometimes mandatory addition to treatment regimes for canine and feline patients with behavioural problems; however, clients and practitioners should be dissuaded that behavioural drugs are 'quick fixes'. Veterinarians should only prescribe psychotropic medication when they have a specific idea of how the mechanism of action of the drug will affect the target behaviours associated with a specific diagnosis. The diagnosis must be treated rather than non-specific signs. Newer psychotropic medications demonstrate the extent to which truly abnormal behaviours are dysfunctions of neurochemistry; synaptic or cellular metabolism; or genetic encoding and 'learning', or LTP, hence there is a clear role for the interaction of neuropharmacology and behavioural and environmental modification.Future advances in treatment in behavioural medicine will be pharmacological and neurophysiological. As the field of behavioural medicine expands, its paradigm will enlarge to include combination therapy and the implementation of neuropharmacological intervention as a diagnostic tool. At present, the veterinary practitioner can effectively aid many common behavioural problems using extant drugs to treat animals with true behavioural pathology. Rational pharmacological therapy requires complete medical and behavioural histories, requisite laboratory work, complete client understanding and compliance, and an honest and ongoing dialogue between the client and veterinarian that includes frequent follow-ups and re-examinations.
-
Cross‐species Studies of Cognition Relevant to Drug Discovery: a Translational Approach
Trevor W. Robbins
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.13826
IF: 7.3
2017-01-01
British Journal of Pharmacology
Abstract:This review advances the case that bidirectional, cross-species translation of findings from experimental animals to and from humans is an important strategy for drug discovery. Animal models of mental disorders require appropriate behavioural or cognitive outcome variables that can be generalized cross-species. One example is the treatment of impulsive behaviour in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with stimulant drugs. Performance on the stop signal reaction task as an index of impulsivity is improved both in healthy human volunteers and in patients with adult ADHD by stimulant drugs and also by the selective noradrenaline reuptake blocker atomoxetine. Functional neuroimaging evidence suggests a modulation of circuitry including the inferior prefrontal cortex by this drug. Parallel work in rats had shown that atomoxetine improves stop signal performance by affecting possibly homologous regions of the rodent prefrontal cortex. This parallel effect of atomoxetine in rodents and humans could potentially be exploited in other disorders in which impulsivity plays a role, such as stimulant abuse and Parkinson's disease. A contrasting relative lack of involvement of 5-HT mechanisms in the stop signal reaction time task will also be described. Research in humans and experimental animals that demonstrate effects of serotoninergic agents such as the selective serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibitor citalopram on probabilistic learning and reversal (upon which atomoxetine has little effect) will also be reviewed, possibly relevant to the treatment of clinical depression, Finally, other promising examples of parallel studies of behavioural effects of CNS-active drugs in animals and humans will also be described. Linked Articles This article is part of a themed section on Pharmacology of Cognition: a Panacea for Neuropsychiatric Disease? To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v174.19/issuetoc.
-
Ethical considerations in clinical training, care and research in psychopharmacology
Rael D Strous
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1461145710001112
Abstract:Psychopharmacology is a powerful tool in psychiatry; however, it is one that demands responsibility in order to deal with the ethical complexities that accompany advances in the field. It is important that questions are asked and that ethical mindfulness and sensitivity are developed along with clinical skills. In order to cultivate and deepen ethical awareness and subsequently solve issues in optimal fashion, investment should be made in the development of an ethical decision-making process as well as in education in the ethics of psychopharmacology to trainees in the field at all stages of their educational development. A clear approach to identifying ethical problems, engaging various ethical concepts in considering solutions and then applying these principles in problem resolution is demanded. An openness in identifying and exploring issues has become crucial to the future development and maturation of psychopharmacologists, both research and clinical. Consideration must be given to the social implications of psychopharmacological practice, with the best interests of patients always paramount. From both a research and clinical perspective, psychopharmacology has to be practised with fairness, sensitivity and ethical relevance to all. While ethical issues related to psychopharmacological practice are varied and plentiful, this review focuses on advances in technology and biological sciences, personal integrity, special populations, and education and training.
-
THE EFFECTS OF SELECTIVE LESIONS OF THE NUCLEUS ACCUMBENS CORE AND SHELL ON APPETITIVE AND AVERSIVE CONDITIONING
J. A. Parkinson,M. C. Olmstead,T. W. Robbins,B. J Everitt
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00008877-199808000-00158
1998-01-01
Behavioural Pharmacology
Abstract:Behavioural Pharmacology publishes original research reports in diverse areas, ranging from ethopharmacology to the pharmacology of schedule-controlled operant behaviour, provided that their primary focus is behavioural. Topics include drug, chemical, and hormonal effects on behaviour, the neurochemical mechanisms underlying behaviour, and behavioural methods for the study of drug action. Both animal and human studies are published. Studies reporting neurochemical data have a predominantly behavioural focus, and human studies do not consist exclusively of clinical trials or case reports. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. Preference is given to studies that demonstrate and develop the potential of behavioural methods, and to papers reporting findings of direct relevance to clinical problems.
-
Milestone review: GABA, from chemistry, conformations, ionotropic receptors, modulators, epilepsy, flavonoids, and stress to neuro‐nutraceuticals
Graham A. R. Johnston,Philip M. Beart
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.16087
2024-02-22
Journal of Neurochemistry
Abstract:GABA, a deceptively simple molecule, is shown in extreme conformations and analogues with selective actions on ionotropic GABA receptors, together with some GABA‐enriched chocolates purchased in Japan, one of the very many publicly available GABA‐enriched products. These studies arose out of a PhD project in the 1970s and illustrate the development of our knowledge of these receptors and their modulators in the areas of epilepsy, stress, and neuro‐nutraceuticals. Arising out of a PhD project more than 50 years ago to synthesise analogues of the neurotransmitter GABA, a series of new chemical entities were found to have selective actions on ionotropic GABA receptors. Several of these neurochemicals are now commercially available. A new subtype of these receptors was discovered that could be a target for the treatment of myopia, the facilitation of learning and memory, and the improvement of post‐stroke motor recovery. The development of these new chemical entities over many years demonstrates the importance of neurochemicals with which to investigate selective aspects of GABA receptors and illustrates the significance of collaboration between chemists and biologists in neurochemistry. Vital were the improvements in synthetic organic chemistry and the use of functional human receptors expressed in oocytes. Current interest in ionotropic GABA receptors includes the clinical development of subtype‐specific agents and the role of gain‐of‐function receptor variants in epilepsy. Dietary flavonoids were found to cross the blood–brain barrier to influence brain function. Natural and synthetic flavonoids had a range of effects on GABA receptors, ranging from positive, silent, and negative allosteric modulators, to even second‐order modulation of first‐order modulators. Flavonoids have been called "a new family of benzodiazepines." Like benzodiazepines, flavonoids reduce stress. Stress produces changes in GABA receptors in the brain that may be because of changes in endogenous modulators, such as neurosteroids and corticosteroids. GABA also occurs naturally in the diet leading to studies of the effects of oral GABA on brain function. This finding has resulted in studies of GABA and related neurochemicals as neuro‐nutraceuticals. GABA systems in the gut microbiome are essential to such studies. The actions of oral GABA and of GABA‐enriched beverages and foodstuffs are now an area of considerable scientific and commercial interest. GABA is a deceptively simple chemical that can take up many shapes, which may underlie its complex functions. The need for new chemical entities with selective actions for further studies highlights the need for continuing collaboration between chemists and biologists.
biochemistry & molecular biology,neurosciences
-
The origin of pharmacopsychology: Emil Kraepelin’s experiments in Leipzig, Dorpat and Heidelberg (1882–1892)
Ulrich Müller,Paul C. Fletcher,Holger Steinberg
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-005-0239-5
2005-12-24
Psychopharmacology
Abstract:This historical review shows that the early history of cognitive psychopharmacology, originally labelled as “pharmacopsychology”, is closely linked to developments in experimental psychology and academic psychiatry. At the beginning of his scientific career, the German psychiatrist Emil Kraepelin (1856–1926) joined Wilhelm Wundt’s laboratory of experimental psychology at the University of Leipzig. Although Kraepelin was fired from his clinical position at the university’s psychiatric hospital, he completed his habilitation, the German equivalent of Ph.D., and started a series of pharmacological investigations in healthy volunteers using common recreational drugs (alcohol, coffee, tea) or medicinal products (amyl nitrite, chloral hydrate, chloroform, ethyl ether, morphine, paraldehyde) together with innovative psychological tasks. This paper reviews Kraepelin’s pharmacopsychological research and his methodological innovations, providing translations, for the first time, from original papers, his monograph On the Modulation of Simple Psychological Processes by Some Medicines and from other sources. Kraepelin’s contributions to psychopharmacology and clinical neuropsychology were far ahead of his time and his conceptual achievements have been largely neglected by modern psychiatry and cognitive neuroscience.
pharmacology & pharmacy,neurosciences,psychiatry
-
Neural plasticity and behavior – sixty years of conceptual advances
J. David Sweatt
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.13580
2016-03-10
Journal of Neurochemistry
Abstract:This brief review summarizes 60 years of conceptual advances that have demonstrated a role for active changes in neuronal connectivity as a controller of behavior and behavioral change. Seminal studies in the first phase of the six-decade span of this review firmly established the cellular basis of behavior - a concept that we take for granted now, but which was an open question at the time. Hebbian plasticity, including long-term potentiation and long-term depression, was then discovered as being important for local circuit refinement in the context of memory formation and behavioral change and stabilization in the mammalian central nervous system. Direct demonstration of plasticity of neuronal circuit function in vivo, for example, hippocampal neurons forming place cell firing patterns, extended this concept. However, additional neurophysiologic and computational studies demonstrated that circuit development and stabilization additionally relies on non-Hebbian, homoeostatic, forms of plasticity, such as synaptic scaling and control of membrane intrinsic properties. Activity-dependent neurodevelopment was found to be associated with cell-wide adjustments in post-synaptic receptor density, and found to occur in conjunction with synaptic pruning. Pioneering cellular neurophysiologic studies demonstrated the critical roles of transmembrane signal transduction, NMDA receptor regulation, regulation of neural membrane biophysical properties, and back-propagating action potential in critical time-dependent coincidence detection in behavior-modifying circuits. Concerning the molecular mechanisms underlying these processes, regulation of gene transcription was found to serve as a bridge between experience and behavioral change, closing the 'nature versus nurture' divide. Both active DNA (de)methylation and regulation of chromatin structure have been validated as crucial regulators of gene transcription during learning. The discovery of protein synthesis dependence on the acquisition of behavioral change was an influential discovery in the neurochemistry of behavioral modification. Higher order cognitive functions such as decision making and spatial and language learning were also discovered to hinge on neural plasticity mechanisms. The role of disruption of these processes in intellectual disabilities, memory disorders, and drug addiction has recently been clarified based on modern genetic techniques, including in the human. The area of neural plasticity and behavior has seen tremendous advances over the last six decades, with many of those advances being specifically in the neurochemistry domain. This review provides an overview of the progress in the area of neuroplasticity and behavior over the life-span of the Journal of Neurochemistry. To organize the broad literature base, the review collates progress into fifteen broad categories identified as 'conceptual advances', as viewed by the author. The fifteen areas are delineated in the figure above. This article is part of the 60th Anniversary special issue.
biochemistry & molecular biology,neurosciences
-
Editorial: Regulation of AMPA receptors in brain diseases, from the genetic to the functional level, volume II
Laura Jiménez-Sánchez,Tak Pan Wong,Alberto Ouro
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsyn.2024.1470791
2024-10-16
Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience
Abstract:In recent years, α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors have gained great interest among the scientific community, given their fundamental role in excitatory synapses and their ability to modulate brain function rapidly. Acting as ligand-gated ion channels, AMPA receptor is the main driver of excitatory neurotransmission in the brain. This role is essential for synaptic transmission and plasticity, neuronal activity, and behaviors. Dysfunction or dysregulation of AMPA receptors has been associated with various brain disorders, including neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease and psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia. This Research Topic further elaborates on the role of AMPA receptors in epilepsy and altered social behaviors, as well as its relationship with N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors during development and synaptic plasticity phenomena.Neural functioning can be better understood by modeling the physiological mechanisms that underlie it. This context makes mathematical models particularly relevant, but it poses a huge challenge to successfully and coherently integrate what is known about the molecular, synaptic, and neuronal components involved and to transfer all this information into large simulations. In this Research Topic, Dainauskas et al. presented a model to understand synaptic plasticity at hippocampal CA3-CA1 synapses (Dainauskas et al., 2023). Given the plasticity of AMPA receptors is largely mediated by NMDA receptors, the authors emphasized the roles of GluN2A and GluN2B NMDA receptor subunits in their model. Interestingly, their model is able to predict synaptic changes based on voltagedependent mechanisms. Validated against experimental data, it showed how the GluN2B subunit influences learning rules and synaptic strength, providing insights into both healthy brain function and pathological conditions.Understanding rules that govern the formation of synaptic circuitry could shed light on the pathogenesis of neurodevelopmental disorders. Chen et al. highlighted the importance of NMDA receptors in synaptic maturation and function (Chen et al., 2024). Although AMPA receptors and NMDA receptors showed smooth distributions across dendrites, short periods of Ca 2+ influx resulted in a rapid clustering of NMDA receptors, followed by an accumulation of Ca 2+ /calmodulin-dependent protein kinases (CaMKII) and AMPA receptors. These results suggest that glutamatetriggered signaling contributes to the maturation of young synapses through sequential recruitment of NMDA and AMPA receptors.Hyperexcitation of a small number of glutamatergic neurons is responsible for inducing epileptic seizures. Zinchenko et al. demonstrated a novel mechanism of calcium-permeable AMPA receptors in GABAergic neurons for triggering seizures: by releasing GABA onto other GABAergic neurons, GABA activated GABAB receptors and potassium channel Kv7, which in turn reduced the activity of postsynaptic GABAergic neurons (Zinchenko et al., 2024). Reduced activity of these GABAergic neurons would facilitate seizures by the disinhibition of glutamatergic neurons. These results identify new targets for the treatment of epilepsy and other neurodegenerative diseases that are related to the hyperactivation of glutamatergic neurons.Finally, Xu et al. reviewed the state of knowledge about the role of AMPA receptors in social behaviors (Xu et al., 2024). They highlighted the role of different AMPA receptor subunits in social behaviors like aggression or sociability. In addition, they summarized the role of AMPA receptors in abnormal social behaviors in brain diseases such as schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorders. A better understanding of the contribution of AMPA receptors to social behavior would allow the identification of new therapeutic targets for treating these pathologies.Together, these papers illustrated a wide range of mechanisms that underlie the maturation, plasticity and network properties of AMPA receptors. The abnormality of these mechanisms could underlie synaptic pathologies in neurodevelopmental disorders and epilepsy. In addition, an increased understanding of the role of AMPA receptors in behaviors creates opportunities for targeting these receptors in treating behavioral deficits in brain diseases. Further examination of the contribution of AMPA receptors to brain diseases remains a promising avenue for discovering novel treatments.
neurosciences
-
Pharmacological enhancement of memory or cognition in normal subjects
Gary Lynch,Conor D. Cox,Christine M. Gall
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00090
2014-01-01
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
Abstract:The possibility of expanding memory or cognitive capabilities above the levels in high functioning individuals is a topic of intense discussion among scientists and in society at large. The majority of animal studies use behavioral endpoint measures; this has produced valuable information but limited predictability for human outcomes. Accordingly, several groups are pursuing a complementary strategy with treatments targeting synaptic events associated with memory encoding or forebrain network operations. Transcription and translation figure prominently in substrate work directed at enhancement. Notably, the question of why new proteins would be needed for a now-forming memory given that learning-driven synthesis presumably occurred throughout the immediate past has been largely ignored. Despite this conceptual problem, and some controversy, recent studies have reinvigorated the idea that selective gene manipulation is a plausible route to enhancement. Efforts to improve memory by facilitating synaptic encoding of information have also progressed, in part due of breakthroughs on mechanisms that stabilize learning-related, long-term potentiation (LTP). These advances point to a reductionistic hypothesis for a diversity of experimental results on enhancement, and identify under-explored possibilities. Cognitive enhancement remains an elusive goal, in part due to the difficulty of defining the target. The popular view of cognition as a collection of definable computations seems to miss the fluid, integrative process experienced by high functioning individuals. The neurobiological approach obviates these psychological issues to directly test the consequences of improving throughput in networks underlying higher order behaviors. The few relevant studies testing drugs that selectively promote excitatory transmission indicate that it is possible to expand cortical networks engaged by complex tasks and that this is accompanied by capabilities not found in normal animals.
neurosciences
-
Computational Psychopharmacology: a Translational and Pragmatic Approach
Trevor W. Robbins,Rudolf N. Cardinal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-019-05302-3
2019-01-01
Abstract:Psychopharmacology needs novel quantitative measures and theoretical approaches based on computational modelling that can be used to help translate behavioural findings from experimental animals to humans, including patients with neuropsychiatric disorders. This brief review exemplifies this approach when applied to recent published studies of the effects of manipulating central dopaminergic and serotoninergic systems in rodents and marmoset monkeys, and possible comparisons with healthy human volunteers receiving systemic agents or patients with depression and schizophrenia. Behavioural effects of central depletions of dopamine or serotonin in monkeys in probabilistic learning paradigms are characterised further by computational modelling methods and related to rodent and human data. Several examples are provided of the power of computational modelling to derive new measures and reappraise conventional explanations of regional neurotransmitter depletion and other drug effects, whilst enhancing construct validation in patient groups. Specifically, effects are shown on such parameters as ‘stimulus stickiness’ and ‘side stickiness’, which occur over and above effects on standard parameters of reinforcement learning, reminiscent of some early innovations in data analysis in psychopharmacology. Computational modelling provides a useful methodology for further detailed analysis of behavioural mechanisms that are affected by pharmacological manipulations across species and will aid the translation of experimental findings to understand the therapeutic effects of medications in neuropsychiatric disorders, as well as facilitating future drug discovery.
-
Impact in psychiatry research through experimentation, translation to industry, policy development and public engagement
Barbara J. Sahakian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114979
IF: 11.3
2022-11-23
Psychiatry Research
Abstract:In this article, I discuss areas where scientists can have impact and that I feel are important for the future of innovative research and societal impacts. Initially, I summarise my research career. I then move on to problem solving, using techniques such as functional neuroimaging and psychopharmacology, and new developments, such as the application of the computerised neuropsychological tests CANTAB, which I co-invented. CANTAB was inspired by the need for early detection, pharmacological treatment and neuropsychological understanding of cognitive deficits in neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disorders. Finally, I address neuroethical and societal concerns through books, articles and the media and affected UK government policy through the Foresight Project. In future, young scientists hopefully will contribute more time to these important areas of policy development and public engagement.
psychiatry
-
Neuroplasticity and Psychedelics: a comprehensive examination of classic and non-classic compounds in pre and clinical models
Claudio Agnorelli,Meg Spriggs,Kate Godfrey,Gabriela Sawicka,Bettina Bohl,Hannah Douglass,Andrea Fagiolini,Hashemi Parastoo,Robin Carhart-Harris,David Nutt,David Erritzoe
2024-11-30
Abstract:Neuroplasticity, the ability of the nervous system to adapt throughout an organism's lifespan, offers potential as both a biomarker and treatment target for neuropsychiatric conditions. Psychedelics, a burgeoning category of drugs, are increasingly prominent in psychiatric research, prompting inquiries into their mechanisms of action. Distinguishing themselves from traditional medications, psychedelics demonstrate rapid and enduring therapeutic effects after a single or few administrations, believed to stem from their neuroplasticity-enhancing properties. This review examines how classic psychedelics (e.g., LSD, psilocybin, N,N-DMT) and non-classic psychedelics (e.g., ketamine, MDMA) influence neuroplasticity. Drawing from preclinical and clinical studies, we explore the molecular, structural, and functional changes triggered by these agents. Animal studies suggest psychedelics induce heightened sensitivity of the nervous system to environmental stimuli (meta-plasticity), re-opening developmental windows for long-term structural changes (hyper-plasticity), with implications for mood and behavior. Translating these findings to humans faces challenges due to limitations in current imaging techniques. Nonetheless, promising new directions for human research are emerging, including the employment of novel positron-emission tomography (PET) radioligands, non-invasive brain stimulation methods, and multimodal approaches. By elucidating the interplay between psychedelics and neuroplasticity, this review informs the development of targeted interventions for neuropsychiatric disorders and advances understanding of psychedelics' therapeutic potential.
Neurons and Cognition,Biomolecules
-
The Neuropsycho–Pharmacology of Attention
Trevor Robbins
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199675111.013.028
2014-01-01
Abstract:Pharmacological influences on cognition and behaviour are often accompanied by effects on different aspects of attention. The actions of many psychoactive drugs (often used in the treatment of psychiatric disorders) depend on effects exerted on the classical chemical modulatory neurotransmitter systems including acetylcholine, and the monoamines, dopamine, noradrenaline and serotonin (or 5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT). These chemical systems originate in the reticular core of the brain and modulate attention by actions on forebrain structures including the thalamus, striatum, and the neocortex (especially the prefrontal cortex). Current research is attempting to dissect separable functions of these chemical neurotransmitters in mediating attention in relation to states of arousal and stress in comparable test paradigms in experimental animals and humans. New directions in research in this area are also identified, including the functions of the novel neurotransmitter orexin, and the role of GABA and glutamate in gamma oscillations and the network properties of the neocortex.
-
Neuropharmacological Modulation of Cognition
Samuel R. Chamberlain,Ulrich Muller,Trevor W. Robbins,Barbara J. Sahakian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wco.0000247613.28859.77
2006-01-01
Current Opinion in Neurology
Abstract:Purpose of review Problems relating to impulsivity, attention, and working memory occur in many neuropsychiatric disorders and represent important targets for pharmacological intervention. The purpose of this article is to review recent neuropharmacological manipulation studies in humans relating to these domains.Recent findings Serotonin manipulations in healthy volunteers did not affect response inhibition, a cognitive function implicated in impulsive symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, trichotillomania, and substance abuse. Serotonin manipulations did affect performance on cognitive tests involving emotionally salient rewards and feedback, suggesting involvement of this neurochemical in affective aspects of impulsivity. Attentional deficits in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and visuospatial neglect were ameliorated by noradrenergic drugs. Noradrenergic beta-blockade suppressed the encoding of emotionally arousing unpleasant stimuli and reduced amygdala activation in healthy volunteers, with potential implications for posttraumatic stress disorder. Dopaminergic manipulations affected aspects of working memory in healthy volunteers and in patients with Parkinson's disease, with evidence for bidirectional effects depending on baseline performance.Summary Recent findings raise exciting prospects for modulating impulsivity, attention, and working memory in a variety of neuropsychiatric disorders. Future studies should use computerized cognitive assessment, measures of functional genetic polymorphisms, and neuroimaging techniques, in order to further elucidate the neurochemical substrates of cognition and optimize treatment approaches.
-
9 Neurobiology of Addiction
miriam sebold,maria garbusow,christian muller,katrin charlet,andreas heinz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2017-bnpa.9
2017-01-01
Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Abstract:Trevor is Professor of Cognitive Neuroscience, being elected to the Chair of Expt. Psychology (and Head of Department) at the University of Cambridge, from October 2002. He is a Fellow of the British Psychological Society (1990), the Academy of Medical Sciences (2000), and the Royal Society (2005). He received the Distinguished Scientific Contribution Award for 2011 from the American Psychological Association. He has published about 750 full papers, with an H index of about 167. He has co-edited eight books, most recently Translational Neuropsychopharmacology (Springer, 2016). Trevor directs the University of Cambridge ‘Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute’, the mission of which is to enhance translation from basic to clinical neuroscience. His interest in translation began with his co-invention of the CANTAB computerised neuropsychological battery, which is currently used in over 700 institutes and clinical centres world-wide. He stepped down as President of the British Neuroscience Association in 2011 and was made a CBE in the New Year’s Honours list of the U.K. in 2012. In 2014, he shared the ‘Brain Prize’ of the Grete Lundbeck European Brain Research Foundation, the most valuable in neuroscience, and in 2015 he received the “Lifetime Achievement Award” of the British Association for Psychopharmacology’. Much evidence, based on experimental studies of intravenous drug self-administration in experimental animals and neuroimaging studies in humans now supports the view that drug addiction results in part from aberrant learning mediated by dopamine-dependent processes of the limbic-striatal interface, including the amygdala and nucleus accumbens. The neural systems of this interface and other frontostriatal networks mediate several relevant forms of learning, including Pavlovian conditioning, goal-directed, action-outcome learning, and stimulus-response habit learning (which is not controlled by outcomes or goals). Hypothetically, drug addiction involves an imbalance between instrumental behaviour controlled by outcomes and habitual responding mediated by stimulus-response associations, corresponding hypothetically to a devolution of neurobehavioural control from (i) the prefrontal cortex to the striatum, and (ii) from the ventral to the dorsal striatum (Everitt and Robbins 2016). I will consider the experimental evidence relevant to these predictions from studies of both experimental animals and humans with substance use disorders. I will focus especially on stimulant drugs, but will consider other substance use disorders, as well the latter as part of a ‘impulse-compulsive’ spectrum of mental health disorders. For human drug abuse, it is difficult to unravel predispositions or causal neurobehavioural factors contributing to addiction, from potential neurotoxic effects of the drugs themselves. I will thus describe strategies for determining the aetiological role of these factors, based on evidence from (i) experimental animals, using several techniques and (ii) human drug abusers or vulnerable adolescents, based on functional neuroimaging methods, employing both longitudinal and endophenotype designs. I will conclude that both types of influence contribute to the drive to addiction. Finally, I will consider implications of this evidence for possible new therapeutic approaches to drug addiction, whether pharmacological or behavioural. Reference . Everitt BJ, Robbins TW. Drug addiction: updating actions to habits to compulsions ten years on. annual review of psychology2016;67:23–50.
-
Translating Cognition from Animals to Humans
J.F. Keeler,Trevor W. Robbins
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2010.12.028
IF: 6.1
2011-01-01
Biochemical Pharmacology
Abstract:Many clinical disorders, whether neurological (e.g. Alzheimer's disease) or neuropsychiatric (e.g. schizophrenia and depression), exhibit cognitive symptoms that require pharmacological treatment. Cognition is multi-faceted and includes processes of perception, attention, working memory, long-term memory, executive function, language and social cognition. This article reviews how it is feasible to model many aspects of human cognition with the use of appropriate animal models and associated techniques, including the use of computer controlled tests (e.g. touch-screens), for optimising translation of experimental research to the clinic. When investigating clinical disorders, test batteries should aim to profile cognitive function in order to determine which aspects are impaired and which are preserved. In this review we have paid particular attention to the validation of translational methods; this may be done through the application of common theoretical principles, by comparing the effects of psychological manipulations and, wherever feasible, with the demonstration of homologous neural circuitry or equivalent pharmacological actions in the animal and human paradigms. Of particular importance is the use of 'back-translation' to ensure that the animal model has validity, for example, in predicting the effects of therapeutic drugs already found in human studies. It is made clear that the choice of appropriate behavioral tests is an important element of animal models of neuropsychiatric or neurological disorder; however, of course it is also important to select appropriate manipulations, whether genetic, neurodevelopmental, neurotoxic, or pharmacological, for simulating the neural substrates relevant to the disorders that lead to predictable behavioral and cognitive impairments, for optimising the testing of candidate compounds.
-
New Insights Into Pharmacology of GABAA Receptor Alpha Subunits-Selective Modulators
Miruna Valeria Moraru,Smaranda Stoleru,Aurelian Zugravu,Oana Andreia Coman,Ion Fulga
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MJT.0000000000001810
2024-09-06
Abstract:Background: Benzodiazepines have long held a leading position in medical therapeutics, known for their multiple common therapeutic properties and primarily being prescribed for anxiety and insomnia. However, their lack of specificity and various side effects have led to a reevaluation of their long-term use, resulting in a rapid growth in the literature focusing on targeted therapies. Areas of uncertainty: Despite many efforts, uncertainties persist and there are heterogeneous findings across studies regarding the pharmacological effects attributed to gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor subunits. Selective compounds targeting GABAA receptor alpha subunits are currently under active research and definitive conclusions have not been reached yet. Some compounds have not progressed to clinical trials, while others, if advanced, have been halted. These challenges emphasize the difficulty in translating preclinical findings into clinical use. Data sources: A literature review was conducted using the PubMed database, searching for articles discussing GABAA receptor subunits. The search was refined by including only selective compounds with potential anxiolytic and cognitive enhancement properties. Results: Findings reveal compounds with promising anxiolytic and antidepressant effects with minimal sedation and absence of tolerance development. Moreover, some compounds show potential in alleviating cognitive dysfunction. There is a broad spectrum of potential therapeutic applications for selective compounds, ranging from neurological disorders such as epilepsy and neuropathic pain to cognitive dysfunction-related conditions. Currently, the leading selective compounds with the most promising results in ongoing clinical trials are basmisanil and darigabat. Basmisanil holds further exploration potential in the treatment of cognitive impairment and related conditions, while darigabat shows progress in the advancement of adjunctive therapy of focal onset seizures and for the treatment of panic disorder, respectively. Conclusions: Future drug discovery efforts are encouraged to focus on positive allosteric modulators that selectively target the α2, α3 subunits and negative/positive allosteric modulators that target the α5 subunit of the GABAA receptor. The pursuit of ligands possessing only anxiolytic effects or those enhancing cognition continues to be an important focus for future research, with promising advancements depicted in recent studies.
-
Studying synaptic plasticity in the human brain and opportunities for drug discovery
Pradeep J Nathan,Stuart R Cobb,Bai Lu,Edward T Bullmore,Ceri H Davies
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2011.06.008
IF: 4.768
2011-01-01
Current Opinion in Pharmacology
Abstract:Synaptic plasticity is the ability of synaptic connections between neurons to be strengthened or weakened; a process that is central to the information processing within the brain and which plays a particularly important role in enabling higher cognitive processes [ 1,2 ]. Its role in disease is becoming increasingly clear across a wide spectrum of CNS disorders. Thus, for example, dysfunctional synaptic plasticity has been reported in neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's Disease (AD) as well as in schizophrenia and in a range of disorders associated with learning disabilities [ 3 ]. Moreover, maladaptive plasticity processes in response to specific external challenges are believed to underlie disorders such as addiction and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The molecular basis of normal and disease plasticity is rapidly being unravelled such that synaptic plasticity now provides a unique platform from which to launch the hunt for highly innovative drugs to treat CNS disease by either, firstly, rectifying identifiable abnormalities in these processes, or secondly, utilizing these processes as a vehicle to rectify, or bypass, other mechanisms underlying disease. In this respect, recent advances have been made in studying synaptic plasticity in humans at the molecular through to clinical level and these approaches now provide a real opportunity to test synaptic plasticity as a treatment paradigm for a wide variety of CNS disorders.