Abstract:Capturing CO2 out of flue gases emitted from power plants is an efficient way to alleviate the greenhouse gas effect. The commonly used method to capture CO2 is to chemically absorb it with amine solutions. The mostly used are aqueous solutions and the aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA) is an effective choice to absorb CO2 with high reaction rate. However, the regeneration energy consumption is too high to be applied into industry efficiently. The main reason is due to the high boiling point, thus the non-aqueous solvent is a good alternative. In this paper, experiment is carried out to investigate the substituteion of water by methanol as the boiling point of it is no more than 343 K. during the experiment, 30%wt MEA aqueous and non-aqueous solutions were studied to absorb CO2 and the pure CO2 gases and simulated gas mixture of 12% CO2 and 88% N2 were studied, respectively. The jacket reactor was used to control the reaction temperature and the jacket spiral cooling pipe was used to cool the outlet gases from the reactor and separate the evaporated solutions. The temperature of the cooling water is 20°C. With the gas flow meter, it is easy to control and record the gas mass flow. And the gas analyzer was used to analyze the component of the mixed outlet gas. Every reaction courses were repeated several times to validate the accuracy. After the compensation of temperature, zero and evaporation, the absorption results were achieved and the CO2 absorption rate along time was obtained and absorption capacities in aqueous and nonaqueous solutions were easily observed. The results show that when the gas is pure CO2, the reaction rates for MEA aqueous solution is higher than that of non-aqueous solution at first, however, the different gap is little. Then after about 15 min, the reaction rate for MEA non-aqueous solution becomes higher than that of aqueous one as its reaction rate decreases. And the absorption capacity of non-aqueous solution is almost 0.1 mol CO2/mol MEA higher than that of aqueous solution. For the mixed gases, the reaction process is much lower than that of the pure CO2 gas. The results show that during the reaction process, the reaction rate of CO2 absorbing in non-aqueous solution is higher than that of aqueous and the CO2 absorption capacity in non-aqueous solution is also larger than that of aqueous. Also, the reaction time for pure CO2 is about 50min and for mixed gas is about 140min. Hence, the non-aqueous solutions have better CO2 absorption performance than the aqueous ones. Also, regeneration experiments were performed and the results show that the temperature ranges of 60-70°C are suitable for the CO2 loaded MEA-methanol solutions. When the temperature is higher than 70°C, methanol is preferable to be evaporated than the CO2 to be regenerated. Thus, the suitable regeneration temperature for MEA-methanol solution is no more than 70°C, which can reduce a large amount of energy in CO2 regeneration process. However, the obvious disadvantage for the non-aqueous solution is that the evaporation of the solution (methanol)

Removing CO_2 Performances of MEA/tertiary Amines Aqueous

Absorption and Regeneration Characteristics of Alkanolamines after CO2removal from Flue Gas

Experiment Study on CO 2 Absorption and Desorption in the Non-Aqueous Blended Solutions of MEA and Methanol

A Novel Diamine Non-Aqueous Absorbent Based on N-methyl diethanolamine Regulation for Energy-efficient CO2 Capture

Fast and Efficient CO2 Absorption in Non-aqueous Tertiary Amines Promoted by Ethylene Glycol

Mixed Amine Absorbent based on Hollow Fiber Membrane Contactor Removes CO2 from Flue Gas

Hybrid Behaviors of CO2 Absorption into Blended DEEA‐based Solution for the Improvement of Capture Performance

Investigation on CO2 Capture Performance of Low-Viscosity Diamine Non-Aqueous Absorbents with N-methyldiethanolamine Regulation

Experimental Study on Regeneration Characteristics of CO2-rich Blended Amine Solution Using Membrane Vacuum Regeneration Technology

Experimental Study of the Absorption and Regeneration Performance of Several Candidate Solvents for Post-Combustion CO2 Capture

Experimental Study on a New High-Efficiency Aqueous Solvent Based on a Blend of N-MethyDiEthanolAmine and TriEthylene TetrAmine for the CO2 Capture

Effects of hydroxyethyl group on monoethanolamine (MEA) derivatives for biomethane from biogas upgrading

Effects of Non-Aqueous Solvents on CO2 Absorption in Monoethanolamine: Ab Initio Calculations

Absorption of Carbon Dioxide into Aqueous Blend of Monoethanolamine and 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium Tetrafluoroborate

Integrated CO 2 absorption-mineralization process by the MEA + MDEA system coupled with Ba(OH) 2 : Absorption kinetics and mechanisms

Characteristics of carbon dioxide desorption from MEA-based organic solvent absorbents

Comparison of Absorption and Regeneration Performance for Post-Combustion Co2 Capture by Mixed Mea Solvents

Enhancing CO2 capture of an aminoethylethanolamine-based non-aqueous absorbent by using tertiary amine as a proton-transfer mediator: From performance to mechanism

Evaluation of CO2 Absorption and Stripping Process for Primary and Secondary Amines

Effects of Alkyl Groups on Monoethanolamine Derivatives for Biomethane from Biogas Upgrading

Study on CO2 Absorption and Regeneration Property of Flue Gas from Methyldiethanolamine-Amine Mixture System