Abstract:Capturing CO2 out of flue gases emitted from power plants is an efficient way to alleviate the greenhouse gas effect. The commonly used method to capture CO2 is to chemically absorb it with amine solutions. The mostly used are aqueous solutions and the aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA) is an effective choice to absorb CO2 with high reaction rate. However, the regeneration energy consumption is too high to be applied into industry efficiently. The main reason is due to the high boiling point, thus the non-aqueous solvent is a good alternative. In this paper, experiment is carried out to investigate the substituteion of water by methanol as the boiling point of it is no more than 343 K. during the experiment, 30%wt MEA aqueous and non-aqueous solutions were studied to absorb CO2 and the pure CO2 gases and simulated gas mixture of 12% CO2 and 88% N2 were studied, respectively. The jacket reactor was used to control the reaction temperature and the jacket spiral cooling pipe was used to cool the outlet gases from the reactor and separate the evaporated solutions. The temperature of the cooling water is 20°C. With the gas flow meter, it is easy to control and record the gas mass flow. And the gas analyzer was used to analyze the component of the mixed outlet gas. Every reaction courses were repeated several times to validate the accuracy. After the compensation of temperature, zero and evaporation, the absorption results were achieved and the CO2 absorption rate along time was obtained and absorption capacities in aqueous and nonaqueous solutions were easily observed. The results show that when the gas is pure CO2, the reaction rates for MEA aqueous solution is higher than that of non-aqueous solution at first, however, the different gap is little. Then after about 15 min, the reaction rate for MEA non-aqueous solution becomes higher than that of aqueous one as its reaction rate decreases. And the absorption capacity of non-aqueous solution is almost 0.1 mol CO2/mol MEA higher than that of aqueous solution. For the mixed gases, the reaction process is much lower than that of the pure CO2 gas. The results show that during the reaction process, the reaction rate of CO2 absorbing in non-aqueous solution is higher than that of aqueous and the CO2 absorption capacity in non-aqueous solution is also larger than that of aqueous. Also, the reaction time for pure CO2 is about 50min and for mixed gas is about 140min. Hence, the non-aqueous solutions have better CO2 absorption performance than the aqueous ones. Also, regeneration experiments were performed and the results show that the temperature ranges of 60-70°C are suitable for the CO2 loaded MEA-methanol solutions. When the temperature is higher than 70°C, methanol is preferable to be evaporated than the CO2 to be regenerated. Thus, the suitable regeneration temperature for MEA-methanol solution is no more than 70°C, which can reduce a large amount of energy in CO2 regeneration process. However, the obvious disadvantage for the non-aqueous solution is that the evaporation of the solution (methanol)

Comparison of Absorption and Regeneration Performance for Post-Combustion Co2 Capture by Mixed Mea Solvents

Experimental Study of the Absorption and Regeneration Performance of Several Candidate Solvents for Post-Combustion CO2 Capture

Integration Study of a Hybrid Solvent MEA-Methanol for Post Combustion Carbon Dioxide Capture in Packed Bed Absorption and Regeneration Columns

Study on Absorption and Regeneration Performance of Novel Hybrid Solutions for Co2 Capture

Experiment Study on CO 2 Absorption and Desorption in the Non-Aqueous Blended Solutions of MEA and Methanol

Performance Comparation of MEA and EDA in Electrochemically-Mediated Amine Regeneration for CO2 Capture

Effects of Non-Aqueous Solvents on CO2 Absorption in Monoethanolamine: Ab Initio Calculations

Simulation and Performance Comparison for CO2 Capture by Aqueous Solvents of N-(2-Hydroxyethyl) Piperazine and Another Five Single Amines

Experimental Study of Regeneration Performance for CO2 Desorption from a Hybrid Solvent MEA‐methanol in a Stripper Column Packed with Three Different Packing: Sulzer BX500, Mellapale Y500 and Pall Rings 16 × 16

Insightful analysis of physical properties, kinetics, absorption capacity, and regeneration heat duty of monoethanolamine and N-methyl-4-piperidinol blended solvent in post-combustion carbon capture

New Approach with Universal Applicability of Evaluating the Heat Requirements in Solvent Regeneration Process for Post-Combustion CO2 Capture

Hybrid Behaviors of CO2 Absorption into Blended DEEA‐based Solution for the Improvement of Capture Performance

Comparative mass transfer performance of CO2 absorption using highly-concentrated AMP-PZ-MEA ternary amines solvent

Postcombustion CO2 capture using diethylenetriamine (DETA) solvent in a pilot‐plant test bed compared to monoethanolamine (MEA) solvent

Experimental Study on Regeneration Characteristics of CO2-rich Blended Amine Solution Using Membrane Vacuum Regeneration Technology

Experimental Study on a New High-Efficiency Aqueous Solvent Based on a Blend of N-MethyDiEthanolAmine and TriEthylene TetrAmine for the CO2 Capture

Analysis and insights of the second-generation ternary AMP-PZ-MEA solvents for post-combustion carbon capture: Absorption-regeneration performance

Comparative Techno-Economic Analysis of CO2 Capture Processes Using Blended Amines

Study of New Blended Chemical Absorbents to Absorb CO2

Evaluating Solvent Efficiency for Carbon Capture: Comparative Analysis of Temperature, Concentration and Diffusivity Effects

A multiobjective experimental based optimization to the CO2 capture process using hybrid solvents of MEA-MeOH and MEA-water