Low-dose and standard-dose whole-body [18F]FDG-PET/CT imaging: implications for healthy controls and lung cancer patients
Daria Ferrara,Lalith Kumar Shiyam Sundar,Zacharias Chalampalakis,Barbara Katharina Geist,Daniela Gompelmann,Sebastian Gutschmayer,Marcus Hacker,Hunor Kertész,Kilian Kluge,Marco Idzko,Werner Langsteger,Josef Yu,Ivo Rausch,Thomas Beyer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2024.1378521
IF: 3.718
2024-04-05
Frontiers in Physics
Abstract:Aim: High-sensitivity hybrid positron emission tomography (PET) imaging using advanced whole-body (WB) or total-body PET/computed tomography (CT) systems permits reducing injected tracer activity while preserving diagnostic quality. Such approaches are promising for healthy control studies or exploring inter-organ communication in systemic diseases. This study assessed test/retest variations in the fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) uptake in key organs from low-dose (LD) and standard-dose (STD) [18F]FDG-PET/CT imaging protocols in healthy controls and lung cancer patients. Methods: A total of 19 healthy controls (19–62 years, 46–104 kg, 10 M/9 F) and 7 lung cancer patients (47–77 years, 50–88 kg, 4 M/3 F) underwent [18F]FDG-PET/CT imaging. All subjects were first injected ("test," LD) with 28 ± 2 MBq FDG and underwent a dynamic (0–67 min post-injection) WB imaging protocol with LD-CT. Then, 90 min post-LD injection, the subjects were repositioned and injected with 275 ± 16 MBq FDG ("retest," STD). Second LD-CT and STD-CT scans were acquired for healthy controls and patients, respectively. Static images (55–67 min post-injection) were considered for subsequent analysis. The CT images were used to automatically segment the target volumes of interest. Standardized uptake values normalized to the body weight (SUV BW ) were extracted for each volume of interest. The mean SUV BW were compared for both LD/STD conditions with paired t-tests. In patients, FDG-avid lesions were manually delineated on LD and STD static images. Effective dose levels were estimated from both the CT and PET acquisitions. Results: Organ-based mean SUV BW were similar between the LD and STD (mean %difference ≤5%) in both healthy controls and cancer patients, except in the heart. Intra-control test/retest variability was significant in the brain, heart, and skeletal muscle ( p < 0.05). While 17 lesions were delineated on the STD images of the patients, only 10/17 lesions were identified on the LD images due to increased image noise. Lesion-based mean SUV BW were similar between LD and STD acquisitions ( p = 0.49, %difference = 10%). In patients, the effective doses were (1.9 ± 0.2) mSv (LD-CT), (16.6 ± 5.4) mSv (STD-CT), (0.5 ± 0.1) mSv (LD-PET), and (4.6 ± 0.3) mSv (STD-PET). Conclusion: LD and STD [18F]FDG injections in healthy controls and lung cancer patients yielded comparable mean SUV BW , except in the heart. Dose levels may be reduced for [18F]FDG-PET imaging without a loss in mean SUV BW accuracy, promoting LD-PET/CT protocols for studying multi-organ metabolic patterns. In oncology patients, this approach may be hindered by a lower diagnostic quality in the presence of significant noise.
physics, multidisciplinary