Abstract:Empirical legal studies can benefit from the research findings of cultural psychology to understand the fundamental principles of law. Research findings in cultural psychology have shown that Eastern Asian cultures and North American cultures differ significantly in value orientations, moral judgments and cognitive styles. East Asian values emphasize collectivism and North American values emphasize individualism. East Asians moral reasons are centered on the principles of duties and responsibilities whereas North American moral reasons are centered on the principles of autonomy and justice. East Asian cognitive styles tend to be more holistic, focusing on context, backgrounds and relations and the North American cognitive styles tend to be more analytic, focusing on objects, categories and dispositions. Such cultural differences have profound implications in legal understanding and legal practices, as laws are human machinery and are subject to the influence of human values, moralities and cognition. Mounting evidence in cross-cultural legal studies has shown East and West differences in causation inquiry, responsibility judgments, contract formation and mediation practices. Research indicates that East Asian causal reasoning is less likely to make the fundamental attribution error as North Americans do. East Asians’ responsibility judgments, compared with North Americans’, involve more contextual information (such as moral judgments) than the law actually warrants. East Asians’ contract formation may be more based on relational obligations than the North Americans’, which are rule based. The compensation judgments by East Asians appear to be based on the consequence whereas judgments made by North Americans seem to be based on intention judgments. East Asians also prefer mediation in conflict resolutions while North Americans prefer litigation in conflict resolutions. We argue that these differences could influence people’s understanding, construction and use of laws in fundamental ways. As the law attempts to further understand people, and as theorists continue to evaluate how human life and law influence each others, scholars in both psychology and law must challenge themselves to reflect on the law’s substantive and procedural standards being applied in different cultural groups.. We hope our paper can generate enough interests among Chinese psychologists and legal scholars to start the journey towards finding solutions that both considers cultural psychology’s empirical findings and effectuates our legal ideals. The cross-culture empirical legal studies hence not only provide a new paradigm for legal scholarship but also provide theoretical guidance for advancing Chinese legal studies in global stages as well as in resolving international legal disputes between people from China and other countries.

Damages for Emotional Distress of Legal Persons Revisited:A Study Based on Comparative Law

The Construction of Judicial Person' Double-layer Theory of Rights Capacity and Its Meaning in Corporation Law

Compensation for Emotional Distress without Torts

A Study on the Compensation for Mental Damage in the Breach of Personhood Property Contracts

Punitive damages under the new Chinese Civil Code – a critical and comparative analysis

A Study on Soraya:Damages for Non-substantial Injury to the General Personality in German Civil Law

Challenge and Contribution of Cultural Psychology to Empirical Legal Studies

On the Non-pecuniary Damages: The Establishment of an Interpretative Theory Framework of

Analysis on Combination of Pure Economic Loss and Basic Rights under the Tort Law

The development, shortcomings and future improvement of punitive damages for environmental torts in China—a reflection and comparative research

An empirical examination of liability for ecological environment restoration in the context of the Civil Code of China

The Chinese Civil Code’s Impact on the Protection of Virtual Reputation in China

Liability for Damages of Personal Information Tort

A Positive Analysis of the Criterion of State Compensatory Liability

A Comparative Research on the Object of Tort Law

On Methods of Bearing Tort Liability

Research on the Judicial Application of The Punitive Damages System for Environmental Infringement

Love Beyond Law: A Chinese/Western Contrast on Law and Emotion

Corporate environmental infringement, legal regulation, and sustainable development: punitive damages as a perspective

The Deficiency and Countermeasures of Private Legal Relief for the Ecological Damages to Natural Resources in China

A Brief Study on How to Perfect the System of Civil Liability Caused by Environmental Pollution