Predicting the Biodistribution of 99Mtc-Labeled Cmorf Effector in Pretargeted Tumored Mice. Variations in the Dosage of MORF Conjugated Antitumor Antibody

Guozheng Liu,Shuping Dou,Jiang He,Yi Wang,Surong Zhang,Mary Rusckowski,Donald J. Hnatowich
2006-01-01
Abstract:1555 Objectives: We previously reported on a semiempirical description of the biodistribution of 99mTc-complementary morpholino oligomer (cMORF) in tumored mice pretargeted by a morpholino oligomer conjugated antitumor antibody (MORF-MN14). The description was based on the pharmacokinetics of both the effector 99mTc-cMORF and the pretargeting agent MORF-MN14 and on their relationship when administered together. By applying the semiempirical description under conditions in which only the effector dosage was varied, it was possible to successfully predict the tumor and normal tissue accumulations of the effector. The objective of this subsequent report is to further establish the utility of this approach by measuring the accumulations of the effector under conditions in which the dosages of the pretargeting agent is varied. Methods: To correct for any variability between the different lots of MN14 used in this and the earlier study, the pharmacokinetics of the antibody was re-examined after conjugation with DTPA and radiolabeling with 111In. Thereafter a pretargeting study was performed under conditions of varying dosages of MORF-MN14 but at fixed pretargeting interval, fixed dosage of radiolabeled 99mTc-cMORF and fixed detection time. The experimental results were then compared to those predicted. Results: The biodistribution of 111In-MN14 at 2 d showed a significantly higher blood level of 3.45 %ID/g compared to 2.24 %ID/g observed previously with an earlier lot of MN14. After taking this difference into consideration, the accumulations of 99mTc-cMORF at various dosages of MORF-MN14 were found to be in gratifying agreement with that predicted by the semiempirical description. Conclusions: Similar to the successful predictions of 99mTc-cMORF accumulations with variations in dosage of radiolabeled cMORF observed earlier, the accumulations of 99mTc-cMORF pretargeted under varying dosages of MORF-MN14 was also accurately predicted. Thus both this and our previous study taken together demonstrate that a semiempirical description based on pharmacokinetic data of both MORF-MN14 and radiolabeled cMORF and their relationship can accurately predict tumor and normal tissue accumulations of the effector in a mouse model and may be used to predict optimum dosages as an alternative to empirical means.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?