Abstract:* To comply with the provisions of the Monetary Control Act of 1980, the Federal Reserve devised a formula to estimate the cost of equity capital for the District Banks' priced services. * In 2002, this formula was substantially revised to reflect changes in industry accounting practices and applied financial economics. * The new formula, based on the findings of an earlier study by Green, Lopez, and Wang, averages the estimated costs of equity capital produced by three different models: the comparable accounting earnings method, the discounted cash flow model, and the capital asset pricing model. * An updated analysis of this formula shows that it produces stable and reasonable estimates of the cost of equity capital over the 1981-2000 period. 1. INTRODUCTION The Federal Reserve System provides services to depository financial institutions through the twelve Federal Reserve Banks. According to the Monetary Control Act of 1980, the Reserve Banks must price these services at levels that fully recover their costs. The act specifically requires imputation of various costs that the Banks do not actually pay but would pay if they were commercial enterprises. Prominent among these imputed costs is the cost of capital. The Federal Reserve promptly complied with the Monetary Control Act by adopting an imputation formula for the overall cost of capital that combines imputations of debt and equity costs. In this formula--the private sector adjustment factor (PSAF)--the cost of capital is determined as an average of the cost of capital for a sample of large U.S. bank holding companies (BHCs). Specifically, the cost of capital is treated as a composite of debt and equity costs. When the act was passed, the cost of equity capital was determined by using the comparable accounting earnings (CAE) method, (1) which has been revised several times since 1980. One revision expanded the sample to include the fifty largest BHCs by assets. Another change averaged the annual estimates of the cost of equity capital over the preceding five years. Both revisions were made largely to avoid imputing an unreasonably low--and even negative--cost of equity capital in years when adverse market conditions impacted bank earnings. The latter revision effectively ameliorates that problem but has a drawback: the imputed cost of equity capital lags the actual market cost of equity by about three years, thus making it out of sync with the business cycle. This drawback does not necessarily result in an over- or underestimation of the cost of equity capital in the long run, but it can lead to price setting that does not achieve full economic efficiency. (2) After using the CAE method for two decades, the Federal Reserve wanted to revise the PSAF formula in 2002 with the goal of adopting an imputation formula that would: 1. provide a conceptually sound basis for economically efficient pricing, 2. be consistent with actual Reserve Banks' financial information, 3. be consistent with economywide practice, and particularly with private sector practice, in accounting and applied financial economics, and 4. be intelligible and justifiable to the public and replicable from publicly available information. The Federal Reserve's interest in revising the formula grew out of the substantial changes in research and industry practice regarding financial economics over the two decades since 1980. These changes drove the efforts to adopt a formula that met the above criteria. Of particular importance was general public acceptance of and stronger statistical corroboration for the scientific view that financial asset prices reflect market participants' assessments of future stochastic revenue streams. Models that reflected this view--rather than the backward-looking view of asset-price determination implicit in the CAE method--were already in widespread use in investment banking and for regulatory rate setting in utility industries. …

The Federal Reserve's Imputed Cost of Equity Capital: A Survey

The Federal Reserve Banks' Imputed Cost of Equity Capital

Formulating the Imputed Cost of Equity Capital for Priced Services at Federal Reserve Banks

Disclosure and Cost of Equity Capital Revisited

Yes, the Composition of the Market Portfolio Matters: The Estimated Cost of Equity

Do A Firm'S Equity Returns Reflect the Risk of Its Pension Plan?

Information Risk and Fair Values: An Examination of Equity Betas

Which measure for PFE? The Risk Appetite Measure, A

What's your real cost of capital?

Valuing the Treasury's Capital Assistance Program

CAPM for Estimating the Cost of Equity Capital: Interpreting the Empirical Evidence

Estimating the Cost of Capital and the Profit Share

Estimating Operational Risk Capital with Greater Accuracy, Precision, and Robustness

THE WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT ON THE CORPORATE PROFITABILITY OF LISTED FIRMS: EVIDENCE FROM CREDIT RATINGS ON FTSE 100 COMPANIES

Evaluating the cost of government credit support: the OECD context

Does the Provision of Voluntary Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Influence the Cost of Equity Capital? Evidence from Australia and the United Kingdom

Accessing Private Markets: What Does It Cost?

Market Pricing of Banks’ Fair Value Assets Reported under SFAS 157 Since the 2008 Financial Crisis

Product network and origin of common equity factor risks

Information Asymmetry, Information Dissemination and the Effect of Regulation Fd on the Cost of Capital

Risk and Return models for Equity Markets and Implied Equity Risk Premium