Abstract:* To comply with the provisions of the Monetary Control Act of 1980, the Federal Reserve devised a formula to estimate the cost of equity capital for the District Banks' priced services. * In 2002, this formula was substantially revised to reflect changes in industry accounting practices and applied financial economics. * The new formula, based on the findings of an earlier study by Green, Lopez, and Wang, averages the estimated costs of equity capital produced by three different models: the comparable accounting earnings method, the discounted cash flow model, and the capital asset pricing model. * An updated analysis of this formula shows that it produces stable and reasonable estimates of the cost of equity capital over the 1981-2000 period. 1. INTRODUCTION The Federal Reserve System provides services to depository financial institutions through the twelve Federal Reserve Banks. According to the Monetary Control Act of 1980, the Reserve Banks must price these services at levels that fully recover their costs. The act specifically requires imputation of various costs that the Banks do not actually pay but would pay if they were commercial enterprises. Prominent among these imputed costs is the cost of capital. The Federal Reserve promptly complied with the Monetary Control Act by adopting an imputation formula for the overall cost of capital that combines imputations of debt and equity costs. In this formula--the private sector adjustment factor (PSAF)--the cost of capital is determined as an average of the cost of capital for a sample of large U.S. bank holding companies (BHCs). Specifically, the cost of capital is treated as a composite of debt and equity costs. When the act was passed, the cost of equity capital was determined by using the comparable accounting earnings (CAE) method, (1) which has been revised several times since 1980. One revision expanded the sample to include the fifty largest BHCs by assets. Another change averaged the annual estimates of the cost of equity capital over the preceding five years. Both revisions were made largely to avoid imputing an unreasonably low--and even negative--cost of equity capital in years when adverse market conditions impacted bank earnings. The latter revision effectively ameliorates that problem but has a drawback: the imputed cost of equity capital lags the actual market cost of equity by about three years, thus making it out of sync with the business cycle. This drawback does not necessarily result in an over- or underestimation of the cost of equity capital in the long run, but it can lead to price setting that does not achieve full economic efficiency. (2) After using the CAE method for two decades, the Federal Reserve wanted to revise the PSAF formula in 2002 with the goal of adopting an imputation formula that would: 1. provide a conceptually sound basis for economically efficient pricing, 2. be consistent with actual Reserve Banks' financial information, 3. be consistent with economywide practice, and particularly with private sector practice, in accounting and applied financial economics, and 4. be intelligible and justifiable to the public and replicable from publicly available information. The Federal Reserve's interest in revising the formula grew out of the substantial changes in research and industry practice regarding financial economics over the two decades since 1980. These changes drove the efforts to adopt a formula that met the above criteria. Of particular importance was general public acceptance of and stronger statistical corroboration for the scientific view that financial asset prices reflect market participants' assessments of future stochastic revenue streams. Models that reflected this view--rather than the backward-looking view of asset-price determination implicit in the CAE method--were already in widespread use in investment banking and for regulatory rate setting in utility industries. …

Which measure for PFE? The Risk Appetite Measure, A

AMWRPN: Ambiguity Measure Weighted Risk Priority Number Model for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis.

Counterparty Trading Limits Revisited:CSAs, IM, SwapAgent(r), from PFE to PFL

RISK MEASURES DERIVED FROM A REGULATOR'S PERSPECTIVE ON THE REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS FOR INSURERS

Risk Measures: Robustness, Elicitability, and Backtesting.

The Federal Reserve's Imputed Cost of Equity Capital: A Survey

Intrinsic risk measures

The link between MiFID and Risk Appetite Framework as an application of best practices for wealth management and the entire value chain of the financial industry

Risk Measures Based on Behavioural Economics Theory

The Federal Reserve Banks' Imputed Cost of Equity Capital

Risk measures based on target risk profiles

Can a regulatory risk measure induce profit-maximizing risk capital allocations? The case of conditional tail expectation

Formulating the Imputed Cost of Equity Capital for Priced Services at Federal Reserve Banks

External Risk Measures and Basel Accords

Booster or stabilizer? Economic policy uncertainty: New firm-specific measurement and impacts on stock price crash risk

Risk Neutral Measure Determination from Price Ranges: Single Period Market Models

Improvements of Risk Measure and Its Application to the Risk Management

Efficient Least Squares Monte-Carlo Technique for PFE/EE Calculations

Measuring Financial Risks by Peak over Threshold Method

A Financial Risk Meter for China

Financial Crisis: A New Measure for Risk of Pension Fund Portfolios