Abstract:Since the last six months,Mr.Dong Xuewen et al. have published several articles as a comprehensive criticism of "Practical Ontological Aesthetics," especially its philosophical foundation,which are advocated by Zhu Liyuan et al. Against their criticism,this issue now publishes four articles as a response with counter-criticism. Zhu Liyuan and Liu Xuguang's "Heidegger Highlights the Intrinsic Ontological Dimension of Marx's Theory of Practice" expounds the objective theoretical relation between Heidegger and Marx's ontological theory in respect of reasoning and method;proves that Heidegger's ontology has opened and highlighted the intrinsic ontological dimension of Marx's theory of practice;at the same time discriminates the fundamental differences between the two and points out the major shortcoming of Heidegger's ontology. Zhu Zhirong's "On the Value of Practical Ontological Aesthetics" argues that the practical ontological aesthetics understands and interprets the category of practice from the ontological dimension;breaks the subject-object dichotomy way of thinking of traditional epistemology,replaces the ready-made theory with the becoming theory,and to some extent develops the practical aesthetics and Marxist aesthetics;as thus have important value;points out that Dong Xuewen and others' criticism against practical aesthetics in political meaning is not in conformity with the actual circumstances. Kou Pengcheng's "Theory and Practical Foundation of Practical Ontological Aesthetics" positively elaborates that the proposition of practical ontological aesthetics is resulting from the ontological shift of aesthetic paradigm and the need of the times,which has a profound theoretical and practical foundation;discriminates the Practice in practical ontology from the Practice in western existentialism from Kierkegaard on,pointing out the unique academic character of the practical ontological aesthetics. Sun Shicong's "Reflection of Theoretical Proposition and Critique of Adorno" puts forward discussion towards Zhao Xuewen's critical reflection on the proposition of practical ontology,pointing out that due to the lack of basic clarification of Adorno's critical perspective and the consequent subjective understanding on Heidegger's ontology,Zhao Xuewen's reflection on the theoretical proposition neither truly returns to the problem domain of Marxist aesthetics,nor really understands the theoretical implication of the proposition of practical ontology.

On the Research of Axiology

Contemporary Chinese axiology oriented towards the practice of reform and opening up

A Two-dimensional Analysis of Alienated Labor

The Attempts for the Ethicization of History by Neo-Marxism in Eastern Europe

In Search of an Ontological Foundation of Ecological Aesthetics

On the Problem of Ideals in Light of Marxism Philosophy

The fundamental question of philosophy: Dialectics of the subject and object of cognition in German classical philosophy and Marxism

Dialectics of Archaic and Modern in the Axiology of Modern Law

Three Questions about the Study of Marxist Philosophy

The Open Secret of Values: The Roles of Values and Axiology in Project Research

Essence of Methodology and Theoretical Resource on Formand Substance of Anthropology

Special Subject of Practical Ontological Aesthetics

On the Existential Dimension and Aesthetic Significance of Marxist Theory of Practice

On the Question of Subjectivity in Marx's Philosopy

Research on Li Dazhao's Philosophical Thought and Its Contemporary Value

An Ontology of Human Presence and Basic Perspective of Marx's Philosophy

A Brief View of Practice Ontology Aesthetics in the Context of Contemporary China

Aesthetics is Generative Oneness of Individuality and Sociality——on a Long Time Controversy of an Aesthetic Problem

Tracing the Origin of Concepts in Western Ethics: An Existentialist Interpretation of Aristotle's Ethical Concepts

The Main Idea of John Dewey’s Philosophy of Value

On the Academic Dimension in Marxist Philosophy