Abstract:The study of literature from the point of view of the search for archetypal images and the study of artistic creativity from the standpoint of structuralism are two important trends. Both of these trends have emerged in the contexts of different scientific paradigms. The origin of archetypal criticism is associated with the figure of Herman Northrop Fry, and the basis of archetypal criticism is psychology, namely the concept of psychoanalysis, founded by Sigmund Freud and Carl Gustav Jung. While the origin of structuralism is associated with linguistics and the name of Ferdinand de Saussure, who first began to consider language as a system of signs in which each element defines other elements and is itself determined by them. With all the difference in origin, in general, both theories do not contradict each other - on the contrary, they complement each other. Archetypal literary criticism and structuralist theory of art have deep internal theoretical connections in several ways: both theories look for repetitive elements in literature, both consider literature as a space of memory about the past. Archetypal literary criticism and the structuralist theory of art direct the appeal to the psychology of man as the creator of works of art. Both directions are also largely based on the idea of binary oppositions: within the framework of the archetypal criticism of the pair, many archetypes are grouped into pairs, whereas within the framework of structuralism, the idea of structure itself is based on elementary concepts opposed to each other; finally, both methods have been criticized for the same shortcomings, such as the denial of author subjectivity and the denial of human progress. This article attempts to show that the theory of archetypes in literature and the structuralist theory of art complement each other, and how exactly this complementarity is achieved.

Order and Regeneration——Analysis on the Cultural Archetype of Lu Xun's Fiction Zhu Jian(Cast A Sword)

Rethinking The Improvement Experience Of Dafen Oil Painting Village In Shenzhen From The Perspective Of Archetype

On the Mental Structure of Cultural Personality of Lu Xun

Archaic Chinese Characters and Change of Formation of Ancient Social System

Reinterpretation of Literary Classics: The Aesthetic Value of Liaozhai Zhiyi Characters in Pu Songling's Works

Cultural Memory and the Epic in Early Chinese Literature: The Case of Qu Yuan 屈原 and the Lisao 離騷

Lack and Reconstruction of Enlightenment——Thinking on the Development of the Contemporary Chinese Culture

“Create Primeval Atmosphere of Nature, Who Is the Sentimental Person”——Dream of Red Mansions and Aesthetics of the Third Phase

Comment on Classical Fictions of the End of Qing Dynasty and the Beginning of Republic

Problems and possibilities of the image of the “new man” in Chinese contemporary literature: starting with an argument between Yan Jiayan and Liu Qing over Liang Sheng-pao

Urban civilization:the mixture of love and hatred——Inspiration of rereading Camel Xiangzi

The Ritual Relics and the New Evidence of the Historian Recording Ancestry: The Sorcery-History Roots of Confucianism and Taoism from the Myth of YuGui

From General to Cultural Symbol --- The Romance of Three Kingdoms and the History of Changes in Guan Yu Persona

Analysis on the Archetypes of Regional Architecture

Searching in the "anomie"——interpretations on Cast Sword and Revenge Again

The Way of Thinking and the Spiritual World of the Chinese——elationship-based, Collectivism and the Foremost Kinship

Archetypal Literary Criticism and Structuralism

Study on the Transformation of Chinese Culture at the Axial Age ——A Discussion with Professor Chen Lai

On Cultural Structure of China and the Artistic Spiritual Outlook

The cultural thought of the new era is explained by the inheritance and development of strange novels in the Wei, Jin and the Southern and Northern Dynasties

The Creative Ideas of Inheriting Culture in Jinyong's Swordsman Fictions