Abstract:In the instant case between China and Japan in the East China Sea, right or title to continental shelf is the central issue of dispute. The law on continental shelf has evolved, from the natural prolongation principle confirmed in North Sea Continental Shelf Case in 1969, to a rule more favorably considering "distance criterion". Therefore, it is necessary to take the time factor into account. Time factor can be approached from three perspectives, that is, critical date, inter-temporal law and contemporary law. Critical date is the date when the dispute was given rise to with a concrete issue. Inter-temporal law should be considered when legal relationship had been constructed before the change of the law, and contemporary law applies only when legal relationship was constructed after the change of the law. The mere fact that Sino-Japanese dispute over East China Sea has long before emerged indicates that the time factor in the dispute is not simply a contemporary law question as Japan asserts. The critical date in this dispute can be dated back to 1974 when China protested the Japanese-South Korean continental shelf agreement. If so, the changes in the law and fact after 1974 would be excluded and the applicable law should be the principle of natural prolongation. Moreover, if the critical date is deemed to be the year of 1996, when conflicting claims on the legal basis on continental shelf became distinct, inter-temporal law needs to be discussed. In such a case, if the change in law (incorporating distance criterion) is merely a treaty rule of UNCLOS, non-retroactivity principle in the law of treaties would neatly determine the application of natural prolongation principle established in previous law. In case that the change in law is an alleged customary rule emerged around the year of 1982, were this subsequent law applied, a reasonable long period of time from the previous law would have been required. It is impossible in the present case to draw a conclusion that the evolution of the law on continental shelf over just twelve years (1969-1982) could be reasonably taken as a long period of time. Therefore, even critical date were to be set in the year of 1996, the applicable law is still natural prolongation principle.

On Carrier S Delay in Delivery in China S Maritime Law

Review of Chinese Maritime Law: 2006

Development Of Maritime Limitation Of Liability In China (1993-2011)

On Types of Defects of Copyright and Legal Liability in the Performance of Publishing Contract

Discoursing Chinese Maritime Law’s Structure and Reform

A Study on the Catch-all Exception of the Carrier

A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S v. Shanghai Chanlian Xieyun Logistics Co., Ltd. et al.

Legal and practical consequences of not complying with ISM code

The Analysis to Lead-Time Difference of Exporting Containers Between Hong Kong and Yantian Port

海上運送法에서 契約自由의 原則과 그 制限

The Comments on Some Certain Issues of the Legal System in Respect of Right of Control

Regulation of Ocean Surcharges in Chinese International Container Liner Shipping Market

Time Factor in the Sino-Japanese Dispute over East China Sea: the Critical Date and Inter-temporal Law

Seller's Guarantee Liability on Defects of Object and China's Contract Law

On the Protection of Crew’s Rights and Interests under the Priority Claim to Seagoing Ships

Research of multinational shipping company's integration strategy in China

Exceptio non Adimpleti Contractus in China:Its Mechanism, Puzzle and Solution

Contract design in ocean shipping market: A performance credit leveraged mechanism

Liabilities in Contract Law of China: Their Mechanism and Points in Dispute

Bills of Lading's Freedom of Contract:with Special Reference to the Development of the International Legislation and to a Special Issue under the Chinese Law

Carrier channel encroachment and forwarder order sequence: an equilibrium analysis of shipping service supply chain