Abstract:According to Article 10 of the 1982 Constitution,a dualist structure of land ownership was established in China.Such an institutional arrangement was originally intended to better protect rural land and the interest of peasants,but has now degenerated into the most serious discrimination against the peasants in China.Not only is the use of rural land strictly regulated,but the title of rural land cannot be transferred without being first expropriated by government and converted into state land.This article discusses the nature of the collective ownership of China's rural land,and aims to reconstruct a more peaceful and just land management regime. In contrast to the city land owned by the state or the whole people,the collectively owned rural land may acquire a degree of substantive ownership.Nevertheless,lessons from China's history indicate that the right to use the rural land shall ultimately resides in individual peasants or their households,and such individualized right shall be respected and protected by law.China's rural land has long been greatly devalued,however,by the legal restrictions on the right to use rural land.The irrational and discriminative regulatory regime over China's rural land needs fundamental reform,so as to return to the farmers the collective land property right as conferred by the 1982 Constitution,and to disconnect land expropriation with the urbanization process. In fact,the substantive issue associated with urbanization is the urban planning and the examination and approval of the land use change by local governments.In this respect,the existing planning process in China,seriously deficient in democratic participation,is often carried out at the mercy of official whim.The American experience of bringing rule of law to the local zoning and review processes may provide some inspiration for China.To assure the rationality of local planning and related examination and approval,it is indispensible to bring democracy to the legislative and civil participatory processes.It is also necessary to establish an appropriate judicial review mechanism to safeguard the legality of the purpose and procedure of planning.

Public Ownership: A New Perspective to Analyze the Collective Land Ownership

The Historical Position of Collective Land Ownership

Objective Regulation of Collective Land Ownership's Character

Easily Equalizing and Hardly Relieving under Collective Ownership of Rural Land:A special village case

Three Perspectives and Their Integration on Reform of Land Grant System

The Social Construction Logic of Property Rights:A review on the property rights studies of Chinese sociologists from the perspective of game theory

On the Issues of Rural Community Collective Main Body:An Analyzing on the Ownership of Rural Collective Land

Study on the Multivariate Perform Subject of Farmer Collective Land Ownership

How Do Farmers Realize Their Rights on the Collective Land in Rural China? An Explanatory Framework for Deconstructing the Subject of Collective Land Ownership

Exploration on the Basic Theory and Legislative Structure of State Ownership

An Analysis on the Nature of Chinese Land Property Rights and Its Trajectory of Reform

Collective land system in China: Congenital flaw or acquired irrational weakness?

The Modern Productivity System and the Structure of Ownership in China

The Owners under the Property Law of Mainland China

Review on the History of the Equalization of Land Ownership Thought and Its Implication

Paradox of Collective Ownership of China's Rural Land and Its Resolution

Market-driven Land Nationalization in China: A New System for the Capitalization of Rural Homesteads

Essay on the Direction of Reconstruction of the Collective Ownership of Land

The Ownership Reform in China: What Direction and How Far?

Marketization of Collective-owned Rural Land: A Breakthrough in Shenzhen, China

Legalization of the Use Rights Market of Collective Construction Land:The Strategic Choice of Chinese Land System Reform