Abstract:This study aims to deconstruct the collective, the subject of collective land ownership. With respect for the logic of the formation of collective land ownership, we propose the "transfreserve" mode to portray the division of rural land rights between the members and the organization in the transformation from private ownership to collective ownership. This idea can be expressed as, prompted by the public power of the state, each farmer as the owner of rural land having to transfer part of his/her rights to the organization when associating, meanwhile each one still reserves part of his/her rights. We term the rights transferred to the organization as special legal person ownership, while the rights reserved by each farmer are called membership rights. The rights exercised by all members on the basis of membership rights are the autonomous rights. In terms of the property rights, such as the distribution right of the collective income, farmers have to participate in decision-making to determine how to form the allocation scheme in a fair and reasonable way by exercising autonomous rights; then, organization fulfills the collective will to meet the needs of its members by exercising special legal person ownership. As for the right to use public infrastructure on the collective land, farmers, as the members, can use it reasonably by its own will, which is the process of exercising membership rights. If farmers' rights are infringed by other members, they can choose to negotiate with other members in a proper way. If farmers' rights are infringed when the organization carries out operation activity in the land market, they can obtain compensation from the organization, and the compensation standard is determined by the decision-making.

Study on the Multivariate Perform Subject of Farmer Collective Land Ownership

On the Issues of Rural Community Collective Main Body:An Analyzing on the Ownership of Rural Collective Land

Easily Equalizing and Hardly Relieving under Collective Ownership of Rural Land:A special village case

Objective Regulation of Collective Land Ownership's Character

The Historical Position of Collective Land Ownership

The Micro Administrative Mechanism of Land Reallocation in Land Consolidation: A Perspective from Collective Action

How Do Farmers Realize Their Rights on the Collective Land in Rural China? An Explanatory Framework for Deconstructing the Subject of Collective Land Ownership

The Summary of Studies on Juristic Character of Main Types of Transference of Rural Land Contract and Operation Rights

Study on Legal Problems of Becoming a Shareholder of Rural Land Contractual Management Right in the Farmers' Specialized Cooperatives——A Case of Zhejiang Province

Study on the Subject of Family Contract and Management Right and the Relationship among Members in Rural Households

Study on Perfecting the Circulation of Rural Land Contracted Management Right System and Solving Existing Legal Problems

Study on the Effect and Constraint of Farmer's Cooperative Organizations in China

Analyses on Peasantry's Land Contracts and Farmer's Land Contract Management

Collective land system in China: Congenital flaw or acquired irrational weakness?

On the Subject and Object of the Transfer of Rural Collective Construction Land

How do China's villages self‐organize collective land use under the background of rural revitalization? A multi‐case study in Zhejiang, Fujian and Guizhou provinces

The Dilemma of Land Expansion and Governance in Rural China: A Comparative Study Based on Three Townships in Zhejiang Province

A Game Theory-Based Analysis of the Driving Forces of Rural Collective Construction Land

Social Capital, Member Participation, And Cooperative Performance: Evidence From China'S Zhejiang

Market-driven Land Nationalization in China: A New System for the Capitalization of Rural Homesteads

Collective Action In Maintaining Rural Infrastructures: Cadre-Farmer Relationship, Institution Rules And Their Interaction Terms