US Public Diplomacy in an Age of Propaganda
Nancy Snow
2004-01-01
Abstract:DC Of course, we didn't call what we did then propaganda, which was too loaded a term and one associated with dastardly regimes, such as Stalin and Hitler. Our euphemism was public diplomacy. The task then was to “tell America's story to the world,” and in the context of the post–Cold War environment of freedom, peace dividends, economic prosperity, and a united pro-Western front, our task seemed simple enough. President Clinton was pushing the Clinton doctrine, which placed US competitiveness and integration of the world economy at the heart of foreign policy. USIA’s mission was linked to NAFTA and the World Trade Organization, with the belief that remaking the world in the image of a US-led free market economy would end ideological clashes.By the mid-1990s, USIA had lost its mission compass and, without a domestic constituency to save it, was sacrificed on the political altar. Officially abolished as an independent agency in 1999, USIA was folded back into its State Department origins, where it existed in obscurity until September 11, 2001. In a split second, it was clear that the propaganda war was underway and that the US government needed to get back into the business of promoting and articulating US positions. Further, the United States needed to do a better job of confronting its poor global image, which in the post-Saddam era has reached its nadir. We are now a nation very much in isolation from the rest of the world, with a reputation more for mistrust than honesty, hostility than goodwill. What went wrong? To counter Osama and Saddam, the United States deployed food drops, initiated shortwave radio broadcasts, and …