PI3Kδ Inhibitor Linperlisib As a ≥ 3-Line Treatment for Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma: A Subgroup Analysis of a Phase II, Single-Arm, Open-Label Trial

Hang Su,Tingyu Wang,Xiuhua Sun,Lihua Qiu,Junning Cao,Zhiming Li,Yuqin Song,Li Zhang,Dengju Li,Huijing Wu,Wei Zhang,Junmin Li,Keshu Zhou,Hui Zhou,Yu Yang,Zhifeng Li,Hong Cen,Zhen Cai,Zhihui Zhang,Weijun Fu,Jin Jie,Fei Li,Weixin Wu,Xuekui Gu,Weiliang Zhu,Lihong Liu,Zengjun Li,Shuhua Yi,Hanying Bao,Zusheng Xu,Lugui Qiu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2023-178710

IF: 20.3

2023-01-01

Blood

Abstract:Introduction Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common subtype of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), originating in follicular central B cells, and accounts for approximately 22% of all newly diagnosed cases of NHL. Chemo-immunotherapy is the standard treatment option for FL. Unfortunately, the progression of the disease to relapsed or refractory FL (r/r FL) is still inevitable, which raised concern about subsequent effective treatments. Several δ isoform of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K-δ) inhibitors have ever been approved for r/r FL after ≥2 lines of prior therapies. However, most of their indications for r/r FL were withdrawal for increased risk of death and serious side effects. The latest data from the Chinese phase II clinical trial of linperlisib (Trial registration ID: NCT04370405), a novel oral PI3Kδ-selective inhibitor, in patients with r/r FL who had received at least two systemic therapies were presented. In this trial, linperlisib demonstrated compelling efficacy and was generally well-tolerated in the treatment of r/r FL patients after ≥2 prior systemic therapies. Linperlisib was approved by China National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) for adult r/r FL previously treated with at least two system therapies in November 2022. The ≥3 lines of treatment options are still unmet for the r/r FL. In this setting, this subgroup analysis of the linperlisib phase II trial aimed to evaluate outcomes of linperlisib in later-line treatment of r/r FL. Methods This study included all the patients with r/r FL who had received at least two systemic therapies previously enrolled in the open-label, single-arm, phase II trial (linperlisib, 80mg, po, q.d., in a 28-day cycle), with overall response rate (ORR) as the primary endpoint. In this subgroup analysis, the patients were divided into two groups according to the treatment lines they received: >3 prior lines of treatment and ≤3 prior lines of treatment. All of the statistical analyses were descriptive. Results A total of 84 r/r FL patients from 25 sites in China from April 2019 to September 2020 were enrolled in this trial, with a cutoff date of September 30, 2021. The ORR was 79.8%, with statistical significance in a heavily pretreated FL patient population with a median of 4 prior therapies, with a well-tolerated safety profile. A total of 43 patients received >3 prior lines of treatment, while 41 patients received ≤3 prior lines of treatment. The median age between the two groups was similar (range: 29.0 - 78.0, 52.0 years for >3 prior lines vs. 48.0 years for ≤3 prior lines). The majority of patients had Ann Arbor staging III-IV (40 for >3 prior lines vs. 34 for ≤3 prior lines). The median number of prior regimens was 4 for >3 prior lines and 3 for ≤3 prior lines. Overall, there were 67 patients achieved responses, with ORR of 83.7% (36, 95%CI:69.3, 93.2) for >3 prior lines vs. 75.6% (31, 95% CI: 59.7, 87.6) for ≤3 prior lines based on independent review committee assessment. Compared with patients who received ≤3 prior lines, patients received ≤3 prior lines achieved higher disease control rate (41[95.3] vs. 37 [90.2%]). The median DOR was 12 months (95% CI: 7.3, 15.9) for >3 prior lines vs. 13 months (95% CI: 9.2, NE). The median PFS was 11.9 months (95% CI: 9.1,19.4) for >3 prior lines vs. 13.3 months (95% CI: 8.2, NE) for ≤3 prior lines. The OS of both groups was not reached. The most common treatment-related adverse events (≥20%, TRAEs) were neutropenia (21 [48.8%] for >3 prior lines vs. 18 [43.9%] for ≤3 prior lines), leukocyte count decreased (15 [34.9%] vs. 15 [36.6%]), alanine aminotransferase increased (10 [23.3%] vs. 9 [22.0%]), lymphocyte count decreased (9 [20.9%] vs. 5 [12.2%]), hypertriglyceridemia (9 [20.9%] vs. 11 [26.8%]), and hypercholesteremia (6 [24.0%] vs. 7 [11.9%]). The most common grade ≥3 TRAEs (≥10%) were neutropenia (9 [20.9%] vs. 4 [9.8%]), pulmonary inflammation (3 [7.0%] vs. 6 [14.6%]), infectious pneumonia (2 [4.7%] vs. 5 [12.2%]). Conclusions This subgroup analysis revealed that linperlisib could achieve benefit in r/r FL patients who received at least 2 prior system therapies regardless of treatment lines. The AEs were well-tolerated. Further trials with large-scale samples were warranted.