PB2272: PI3KΔ INHIBITOR LINPERLISIB FOR PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED OR REFRACTORY FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMA: SUBGROUP ANALYSIS OF A PHASE 2 TRIAL

Lihua Qiu,Tingyu Wang,Xiuhua Sun,Hang Su,Junning Cao,Zhiming Li,Yuqin Song,Li Zhang,D. Li,Huijing Wu,Wei Zhang,Junmin Li,Keshu Zhou,Hui Zhou,Yang Yu,Zhifeng LI,Hong Cen,Cai Zhang,Zhihui Zhang,Weijun Fu,Jie Jin,Fēi Li,Weixin Wu,Xuekui Gu,Weiliang Zhu,Lihong Liu,Zengjun Li,Shuhua Yi,Lugui Qiu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hs9.0000975820.37624.bc
2023-01-01
HemaSphere
Abstract:Topic: 18. Indolent and mantle-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma - Clinical Background: Linperlisib (YY-20394) is an oral PI3Kδ-selective inhibitor. In a multicenter phase 2 trial (NCT04370405), the efficacy and safety of linperlisib as third- or further-line treatment has been evaluated in patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma. The objective response rate (ORR) was 79.8% and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.4 months. These compelling results have led to the conditional approval of linperlisib in China in 2022. Aims: This subgroup analysis aimed to separately analyze the efficacy and safety of linperlisib in patients with relapsed disease and those with refractory disease from this phase 2 trial. Methods: This phase 2 study enrolled 84 patients from 25 sites in China between April 2019 and September 2020, including 39 (46.4%) patients with relapsed-only disease and 45 (53.6%) patients with refractory disease. The refractory subgroup also included patients with both relapsed and refractory disease. All patients received oral linperlisib 80 mg once daily until disease progression, intolerable toxicity or withdrawal from the study. Response was assessed by an independent review committee according to the International Working Group consensus response evaluation criteria in lymphoma (RECIL 2017). Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. The primary endpoint was ORR. Results: The refractory subgroup had a shorter treatment time since diagnosis (median, 2.16 vs 4.03 years) and lower proportion of patients with at least three lines of prior therapies (73.3% vs 82.1%) compared with the relapsed-only group. All patients in both subgroups had received prior anti-CD20 antibody and alkylating agent. The ORR (73.3%, 33/45) in the refractory group was lower than that (87.2%, 34/39) in the relapsed-only group. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs were decreased neutrophil count (17.8%), infectious pneumonia (13.3%), and interstitial lung disease (6.7%) in the refractory group, and infectious pneumonia (25.6%) and decreased neutrophil count (12.8%) in the relapsed-only group (Table). Summary/Conclusion: The efficacy of linperlisib was numerically better in patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma than those with refractory follicular lymphoma. Grade ≥3 interstitial lung disease was relatively more common in patients with refractory follicular lymphoma.Keywords: PI3K, Follicular lymphoma, Phase II
What problem does this paper attempt to address?