Determination of Thed0→k+π−relative Strong Phase Using Quantum-Correlated Measurements Ine+<…

D. M. Asner,K. W. Edwards,P. Naik,R. A. Briere,T. Ferguson,G. Tatishvili,H. Vogel,M. E. Watkins,Jonathan L. Rosner,J. P. Alexander,D. G. Cassel,J. E. Duboscq,R. Ehrlich,L. Fields,L. Gibbons,R. Gray,S. W. Gray,D. L. Hartill,B. K. Heltsley,D. Hertz,C. D. Jones,J. Kandaswamy,D. L. Kreinick,В. Е. Кузнецов,H. Mahlke-Krüger,D. Mohapatra,Peter Onyisi,J. R. Patterson,D. Peterson,D. Riley,A. Rýd,A. J. Sadoff,X. Shi,S. Stroiney,W. M. Sun,T. Wilksen,S. B. Athar,Rishi Patel,J. Yelton,P. Rubin,B. I. Eisenstein,I. Karliner,S. Mehrabyan,N. Lowrey,M. Selen,E. J. White,J. Wiss,R. E. Mitchell,M. R. Shepherd,D. Besson,T. K. Pedlar,D. Cronin-Hennessy,K. Y. Gao,J. Hietala,Y. Kubota,T. Klein,B. W. Lang,R. Poling,A. W. Scott,P. Zweber,S. Dobbs,Z. Metreveli,K. K. Seth,A. Tomaradze,J. Libby,A. Powell,G. Wilkinson,K. M. Ecklund,W. A. Love,V. Savinov,A. López,H. Méndez,J. E. Ramirez Vargas,Jun Ge,David Miller,B. Sanghi,Ian Peter Joseph Shipsey,B. Xin,G. S. Adams,M. Anderson,J. P. Cummings,I. Dankó,Dandan Hu,B. Moziak,J. Napolitano,Q. He,J. Insler,H. Muramatsu,C. S. Park,E. H. Thorndike,F. Yang,M. Artuso,S. Blusk,Sadia Khalil,J. Li,R. Mountain,S. Nisar,K. Randrianarivony,N. Sultana,T. Skwarnicki,S. Stone,J. C. Wang,L. M. Zhang,G. Bonvicini,D. Cinabro,M. Dubrovin,A. Lincoln,Jonas Rademacker
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.78.012001
2008-01-01
Abstract:We exploit the quantum coherence between pair-produced D0 and ¯¯¯D0 in ψ(3770) decays to study charm mixing, which is characterized by the parameters x and y, and to make a first determination of the relative strong phase δ between doubly Cabibbo-suppressed D0→K+π− and Cabibbo-favored ¯¯¯D0→K+π−. We analyze a sample of 1.0×106 D0¯¯¯D0 pairs from 281 pb−1 of e+e− collision data collected with the CLEO-c detector at Ecm=3.77 GeV. By combining CLEO-c measurements with branching fraction input and time-integrated measurements of RM≡(x2+y2)/2 and RWS≡Γ(D0→K+π−)/Γ(¯¯¯D0→K+π−) from other experiments, we find cosδ=1.03+0.31−0.17±0.06, where the uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively. In addition, by further including external measurements of charm mixing parameters, we obtain an alternate measurement of cosδ=1.10±0.35±0.07, as well as xsinδ=(4.4+2.7−1.8±2.9)×10−3 and δ=(22+11+9−12−11)°.1 MoreReceived 18 February 2008DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.78.012001©2008 American Physical Society
What problem does this paper attempt to address?