Updated measurement of the strong phase inD0→K+π−decay using quantum correlations ine+e−→D0D¯0at CLEO

D. M. Asner,G. Tatishvili,J. Y. Ge,D. H. Miller,I. P. J. Shipsey,B. Xin,G. S. Adams,J. Napolitano,K. M. Ecklund,Q. He,J. Insler,H. Muramatsu,L. J. Pearson,E. H. Thorndike,M. Artuso,S. Blusk,N. Horwitz,R. Mountain,T. Skwarnicki,S. Stone,J. C. Wang,L. M. Zhang,P. U. E. Onyisi,G. Bonvicini,D. Cinabro,A. Lincoln,M. J. Smith,P. Zhou,P. Naik,J. Rademacker,K. W. Edwards,E. J. White,R. A. Briere,H. Vogel,J. L. Rosner,J. P. Alexander,D. G. Cassel,S. Das,R. Ehrlich,L. Gibbons,S. W. Gray,D. L. Hartill,D. L. Kreinick,V. E. Kuznetsov,J. R. Patterson,D. Peterson,D. Riley,A. Ryd,A. J. Sadoff,X. Shi,S. Stroiney,W. M. Sun,J. Yelton,P. Rubin,N. Lowrey,S. Mehrabyan,M. Selen,J. Wiss,J. Libby,M. Kornicer,R. E. Mitchell,D. Besson,T. K. Pedlar,D. Cronin-Hennessy,J. Hietala,S. Dobbs,Z. Metreveli,K. K. Seth,A. Tomaradze,T. Xiao,A. Powell,C. Thomas,G. Wilkinson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.86.112001
IF: 5.407
2012-01-01
Physical Review D
Abstract:We analyze a sample of $3\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{6}$ quantum-correlated ${D}^{0}{\overline{D}}^{0}$ pairs from $818\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{pb}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ of ${e}^{+}{e}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ collision data collected with the CLEO-c detector at ${E}_{\mathrm{cm}}=3.77\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{GeV}$, to give an updated measurement of $\mathrm{cos}\ensuremath{\delta}$ and a first determination of $\mathrm{sin}\ensuremath{\delta}$, where $\ensuremath{\delta}$ is the relative strong phase between doubly Cabibbo-suppressed ${D}^{0}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{K}^{+}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ and Cabibbo-favored ${\overline{D}}^{0}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{K}^{+}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ decay amplitudes. With no inputs from other experiments, we find $\mathrm{cos}\ensuremath{\delta}={0.81}_{\ensuremath{-}0.18\ensuremath{-}0.05}^{+0.22+0.07}$, $\mathrm{sin}\ensuremath{\delta}=\ensuremath{-}0.01\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.41\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.04$, and $|\ensuremath{\delta}|=({10}_{\ensuremath{-}53\ensuremath{-}0}^{+28+13})\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}$. By including external measurements of mixing parameters, we find alternative values of $\mathrm{cos}\ensuremath{\delta}={1.15}_{\ensuremath{-}0.17\ensuremath{-}0.08}^{+0.19+0.00}$, $\mathrm{sin}\ensuremath{\delta}={0.56}_{\ensuremath{-}0.31\ensuremath{-}0.20}^{+0.32+0.21}$, and $\ensuremath{\delta}=({18}_{\ensuremath{-}17}^{+11})\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}$. Our results can be used to improve the world average uncertainty on the mixing parameter $y$ by approximately 10%.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?