NHS in England Balances Books, but Local Deficits Mean Worse Care in Some Areas, Says Report

Nigel Hawkes
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5356
2018-01-01
Abstract:The NHS in England balanced its books in 2017-18, but appearances can be deceptive, says the parliamentary Public Accounts Committee in its review of the NHS’s accounts.1 Striking the balance required some creative accounting, such as using money from the Sustainability and Transformation Fund to meet winter pressures, and the overall picture of stability conceals some local variation that could be affecting the care of patients. The Department of Health and Social Care spent £120.7bn (€134bn; $153bn) on running costs and £5.2bn on capital spending in 2017-18. Both budgets were underspent, as it had been allocated £121.3bn for running and £5.6bn for capital costs. Failing to stay within budget is a capital offence in Whitehall, so the department’s civil servants will …
What problem does this paper attempt to address?