Abstract:Background The success of a Mendelian randomization (MR) study critically depends on the validity of the assumptions underlying MR. We focus on detecting heterogeneity (also known as horizontal pleiotropy) in two‐sample summary‐data MR. A popular approach is to apply Cochran's Q statistic method, developed for meta‐analysis. However, Cochran's Q statistic, including its modifications, is known to lack power when its degrees of freedom are large. Furthermore, there is no theoretical justification for the claimed null distribution of the minimum of the modified Cochran's Q statistic with exact weighting (Qmin ), although it seems to perform well in simulation studies. Method The principle of our proposed method is straightforward: if a set of variables are valid instruments, then any linear combination of these variables is still a valid instrument. Specifically, this principle holds when these linear combinations are formed using eigenvectors derived from a variance matrix. Each linear combination follows a known normal distribution from which a p value can be calculated. We use the minimum p value for these eigenvector‐based linear combinations as the test statistic. Additionally, we explore a modification of the modified Cochran's Q statistic by replacing the weighting matrix with a truncated singular value decomposition. Results Extensive simulation studies reveal that the proposed methods outperform Cochran's Q statistic, including those with modified weights, and MR‐PRESSO, another popular method for detecting heterogeneity, in cases where the number of instruments is not large or the Wald ratios take two values. We also demonstrate these methods using empirical examples. Furthermore, we show that Qmin does not follow, but is dominated by, the claimed null chi‐square distribution. The proposed methods are implemented in an R package iGasso. Conclusions Dimension reduction techniques are useful for generating powerful tests of heterogeneity in MR.

Test for Homogeneity of Odds Ratios Using &Amp;lt;i&gt;u&lt;/i&gt;-Statistics

Homogeneity Test of Ratios of Two Proportions in Stratified Bilateral and Unilateral Data

Testing the homogeneity of risk differences with sparse count data

Testing Homogeneity of Proportion Ratios for Stratified Bilateral Correlated Data

Testing the homogeneity of odds ratio across strata for combined bilateral and unilateral data

Testing homogeneity of proportions from sparse binomial data with a large number of groups

Nonparametric tests for treatment effect heterogeneity in observational studies

Testing two variances for superiority/non-inferiority and equivalence: Using the exhaustion algorithm for sample size allocation with cost

Homogeneity tests and interval estimations of risk differences for stratified bilateral and unilateral correlated data

Tests for equivalence based on odds ratio for matched-pair design

Comparing Ratios of the Mean to a Power of Variance in Two Samples Via Self-Normalized Test Statistics

Risk difference tests for stratified binary data under Dallal's model

An efficient asymptotic approach for testing monotone proportions assuming an underlying logit based order dose-response model

An Extreme-Value Approach for Testing the Equality of Large U-Statistic Based Correlation Matrices

Powerful Test of Heterogeneity in Two‐Sample Summary‐Data Mendelian Randomization

Multivariate two-sample test statistics based on data depth

Adaptive Testing for High-dimensional Data

Equivalence Test in Multi-dimensional Space with Applications in A/B Testing

Impact of Sample Size and Variability on the Power and Type I Error Rates of Equivalence Tests: A Simulation Study.

Generalized score test of homogeneity for mixed effects models

Likelihood Ratio Test and the Evidential Approach for 2 × 2 Tables

Test for Homogeneity of Odds Ratios Using &Amp;lt;i&amp;gt;u&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;-Statistics