Clinical Predictive Models for Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia in Breast Cancer Patients: A Validation Study.

Kai Chen,Xiaolan Zhang,Liling Zhu,Fengxi Su
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.1055
IF: 45.3
2014-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:1055 Background: This study aims to validate a predictive model (Jenkin’s model) for febrile neutropenia (FN) during chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer patients. Methods: A total of 428 breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy (Anthracycline and/or taxane based) without any prophylactic use of colony-stimulating factor were included. Pretreatment absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) and absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC) were used by the Jenkin’s model to assess the risk of FN. In addition, we modified the threshold of Jenkin’s model and generated Model-A and B. We also developed Model-C by incorporating the absolute monocyte count (AMC) as a predictor into Model-A. The rates of FN in the 1st chemotherapy cycle were calculated. A valid model should be able to identify high-risk subgroup of patients with FN rate >20%. Results: Jenkin’s model (Predicted as high-risk when ANC≦3.1*10^9/L;ALC≦1.5*10^9/L) did not identify any patient with a significantly high risk (>20%) of FN in our population, even if we used different thresholds in Model-A(ANC≦4.4*10^9/L;ALC≦2.1*10^9/L) or B(ANC≦3.8*10^9/L;ALC≦1.8*10^9/L) . However, with AMC added as an additional predictor, Model-C(ANC≦4.4*10^9/L;ALC≦2.1*10^9/L; AMC≦0.28*10^9/L) identified a subgroup of patients with a significantly high risk of FN (23.1%). Conclusions: In our population, the threshold of Jenkin's model should be changed and the AMC should be incorporated as a predictor, to have improved predictive ability. Model Group ANC (×10^9/L) ALC (×10^9/L) AMC (×10^9/L) Total N FN rate N(%) P Jenkin's I ≦5.2 ≦2.4 n/a 155 15(9.7) NS II ≦5.2 ≦2.4 n/a 93 9(9.7) III ≦4.4 ≦2.1 n/a 72 14(19.4) IV ≦3.8 ≦1.8 n/a 69 13(18.8) V (high-risk) ≦3.1 ≦1.5 n/a 39 4(10.3) Model-A Low-risk (group I and II) ≦4.1 ≦2.1 n/a 248 24(9.7) <0.05 High-risk (group III, IV, and V) ≦4.4 ≦2.1 n/a 180 31(17.2) Model-B Low-risk (group I, II, and III) ≦3.8 ≦1.8 n/a 320 38(11.9) NS High-risk (group IV and V) ≦3.8 ≦1.8 n/a 108 17(15.7) Model-C Low-risk Not fulfil the criteria of high-risk group 337 34(10.1) <0.01 High-risk ≦4.4 ≦2.1 ≦0.28 91 21(23.1)
What problem does this paper attempt to address?