A clinicopathological analysis of neoadjuvant therapy for early breast cancer complicated with febrile neutropenia

向泓雨,辛灵,徐玲,叶京明,刘荫华
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2023.03.16
2023-01-01
Abstract:Objective To study the risk factors of febrile neutropenia(FN) after neoadjuvant therapy for early breast cancer and explore the short-term efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy. Methods The clinical data of early breast cancer patients undergone neoadjuvant therapy in Breast Disease Center of the Peking University First Hospital from January 1st 2018 to June 30th, 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. Results A total of 370 patients with early breast cancer underwent neoadjuvant therapy with different regiments, among which 32 cases developed FN, accounting for 8.6%.Clinicopathological analysis showed that FN was correlated with advanced age, the presence of background diseases, and the use of anthracene combined with taxanes(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the proportion of FN after prophylactic use of long-acting or short-acting granulocytic stimulating factor(P=0.791). There was no correlation between FN and pCR(P=0.497). Conclusion In the case of prophylactic application of granulocytic stimulating factor,the incidence of FN in patients underwent neoadjuvant therapy was lower, the safety was better, and the operation time is not delayed.Patients who were elder than 65 years old, had background diseases and received the regimen with the combination of anthracene and taxanes were the main cause of FN. Prophylactic use of long-acting granulocytic stimulating factor did not reduce the incidence of FN compared with short-acting form.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?