Revisiting SH‐Wave Data Using Love‐Wave Analysis

Jianghai Xia,Richard D. Miller,Recep Çakır,Yinhe Luo,Yixian Xu,Chong Zeng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4133/1.3445483
2010-01-01
Abstract:PreviousNext No AccessSymposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2010Revisiting SH‐Wave Data Using Love‐Wave AnalysisAuthors: Jianghai XiaRichard D. MillerRecep CakirYinhe LuoYixian XuChong ZengJianghai XiaKansas Geological Survey, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KansasSearch for more papers by this author, Richard D. MillerKansas Geological Survey, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KansasSearch for more papers by this author, Recep CakirWashington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WashingtonSearch for more papers by this author, Yinhe LuoChina University of Geosciences, Wuhan, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author, Yixian XuChina University of Geosciences, Wuhan, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author, and Chong ZengKansas Geological Survey, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KansasSearch for more papers by this authorhttps://doi.org/10.4133/1.3445483 SectionsAboutPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Abstract Although Love waves are widely analyzed in earthquake seismology, there is much less attention on utilizing Love waves than Rayleigh waves by the near‐surface community. Unlike incident P and Sv waves, a plane SH wave for a series of horizontal layers refracts and reflects only SH waves, which makes the shallow SH‐wave refraction method more popular to define shear (S)‐wave velocity in near‐surface geologic applications. For this reason, abundant SH‐wave refraction data have been acquired and S‐wave velocities have been determined using their first arrivals. If signals are recorded long enough, Love‐wave energy can be clearly observed on SH‐wave refraction data. Wave conversion may occur in an SH‐wave refraction and Love‐wave analysis only results in SH‐wave velocities, which suggest that we may benefit from revisiting the existing SH‐refraction data using multichannel analysis of Love waves (MALW). We used numerical modeling results and real‐world examples to demonstrate three advantages of revisiting SH‐wave data using the MALW method. Owing to a long geophone spread commonly used in SH‐wave refraction survey, a sharp image of Love‐wave energy can be generated, allowing better pickings for the phase velocities of Love waves. Because Love waves are independent of P‐wave velocity, “mode crossing” in an image of Love‐wave energy is less common than in Rayleigh‐wave images. Fewer unknowns in the method MALW make dispersion curves of Love waves are simpler, which leads to more stable inversion of Love waves and reduces the degree of nonuniqueness.Permalink: https://doi.org/10.4133/1.3445483FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2010ISSN (online):1554-8015Copyright: 2010 Pages: 1076 publication data© 2010 Copyright © 2010 The Environmental and Engineering Geophysical SocietyPublisher:Environmental & Engineering Geophysical Society HistoryPublished: 17 May 2010 CITATION INFORMATION Jianghai Xia, Richard D. Miller, Recep Cakir, Yinhe Luo, Yixian Xu, and Chong Zeng, (2010), "Revisiting SH‐Wave Data Using Love‐Wave Analysis," Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems Proceedings : 569-580. https://doi.org/10.4133/1.3445483 Plain-Language Summary PDF DownloadLoading ...
What problem does this paper attempt to address?