Abstract:This paper provides the first systematic evidence on compensation for executives of firms listed in China???s emerging stock market (currently the eighth largest of the world with market capitalization of over $550 billion). Specifically, using comprehensive financial and accounting data on China???s listed firms from 1998 to 2002 (data modeled after Compustat and CRSP in the U.S.), augmented by unique data on executive compensation, we find for the first time statistically significant sensitivities and elasticities of annual cash compensation (salary and bonus) for top executives with respect to shareholder value in China. The size of the estimated sensitivities imply that a 1000 RMB increase in shareholder value yields a 0.020 RMB to 0.053 RMB increase in annual cash compensation, whereas the size of the estimated elasticities suggest that a 10 percent increase in shareholder value results in 3.7 to 4.0 percent increase in annual cash compensation for top executives. The estimated sensitivities and elasticities of cash compensation for top executives in China???s listed firms are greater than what has been reported for Japan and the U.S. However, we also find that state ownership of China???s listed firms is weakening executive pay-performance link and thus possibly making China???s listed firms less effective in solving the agency problem. As such, ownership restructuring may be needed for the ???shareholding experiment??? to fully succeed in transforming China???s emerging listed firms to efficient modernized corporations and for the overall successful economic transition of China. Finally, we find that sales growth is significantly linked to executive compensation and that Chinese executives are penalized for making negative profit although they are neither penalized for declining profit nor rewarded for rising profit insofar as it is positive.

Does Cross-listing in Hong Kong Help to Improve Corporate Governance of Chinese Companies?——A Comparison of Compensation Scheme of Chinese Firms Listed in Hong Kong and on the Mainland

Are Stronger Executive Incentives Associated with Cross-Listing? Evidence from China

Short‐sellers at Home and Abroad: Their Respective Roles in the Price Discovery of Cross‐listed Firms

Cross-Listing, Corporate Governance And Operating Performance - Evidence From The Chinese Market

Do Cross-Listed Firms Have a Better Governance Structure and Lower Agency Costs? Evidence from Chinese Firms

Cross‐listing on the Hong Kong Exchange and Chinese firm innovation: New evidence

Does Cross-listing Curb the Interest Conflicts between Controlling Stockholders and Small Stockholders

Incentive Mechanism and Investor Protection of the Capital Structure: Evidence from Comparison between Public Companies Listed in Mainland and HK

Executive Compensation, Firm Performance, and State Ownership in China: Evidence from New Panel Data*

Cross-listing and Bonding Premium: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

How Cross-Listings from an Emerging Economy Affect the Host Market?

An Empirical Study Of The Effects Of Corporate Performance On Managerial Compensation Based On China'S Listed Companies

Managerial Cash Compensation, Government Control and Leverage Choice: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms

Do Market Value Market-Based Governance? Case of Cross-Border Acquisitions by Chinese Firms

Cross Listing and Corporate Governance——The Newest Evidences Based on "bonding Hypothesis"

A study on the top management compensation in listed high-tech companies and its effectiveness

A Survey of Executive Compensation Contracts in China’s Listed Companies

Local Versus Global: Corporate Governance Practices in Chinese Domestic and Overseas Companies

An Empirical Research on the Relationship of Equity Incentive and Performance of Chinese Listed Companies

Cross-listing and CSR Performance: Evidence from AH Shares

Are Stock Price More Informative after Dual-Listing in Emerging Markets? Evidence from Hong Kong-Listed Chinese Companies