Abstract:Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the effect of corporate governance on financial performance in China. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: The study indicated a positive correlation between strong corporate governance practices and improved financial outcomes for companies. These practices typically include transparent decision-making processes, effective board oversight, and alignment of management incentives with long-term shareholder value. Study suggests that companies with robust corporate governance structures tend to experience higher profitability, better risk management, increased investor confidence, and enhanced access to capital. Additionally, strong corporate governance is associated with lower instances of financial misconduct and improved overall corporate reputation, which can further contribute to sustainable financial performance over time. Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Agency theory, stewardship theory and resource dependency theory may be used to anchor future studies on assessing the effect of corporate governance on financial performance in China. Implement best practices in corporate governance that align with empirical findings and theoretical insights to optimize financial performance. Advocate for regulatory frameworks and policies that incentivize effective corporate governance practices and align them with desired financial performance outcomes.

Cross-Listing, Corporate Governance And Operating Performance - Evidence From The Chinese Market

Family Firms, Corporate Governance and Performance: Evidence from Zhejiang

Do Cross-Listed Firms Have a Better Governance Structure and Lower Agency Costs? Evidence from Chinese Firms

Cross Listing and Corporate Governance——The Newest Evidences Based on "bonding Hypothesis"

Cross-listing and CSR Performance: Evidence from AH Shares

Does Cross-listing in Hong Kong Help to Improve Corporate Governance of Chinese Companies?——A Comparison of Compensation Scheme of Chinese Firms Listed in Hong Kong and on the Mainland

Are Stronger Executive Incentives Associated with Cross-Listing? Evidence from China

An Evaluation of Corporate Governance Evaluation, Governance Index ( CGI NK ) and Performance: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies in 2003

Does Cross-listing Curb the Interest Conflicts between Controlling Stockholders and Small Stockholders

Cross-listing and Bonding Premium: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

Corporate Performance Based on Single-index Semi-parametric Methods

Cross‐listing on the Hong Kong Exchange and Chinese firm innovation: New evidence

The value of home-country governance for cross-listed stocks

Board Structure, Political Influence and Firm Performance - an Empirical Study on Publicly Listed Firms in China

Performance Evaluation Mechanism and CEO Turnover——Evidence Based on Different Ultimate Ownership in China's Lasted Firms

Effect of Corporate Governance on Financial Performance in China

Takeover of State-controlled Companies, Company Governance and Operating Performance——An Empirical Evidence from Chinese A-Stock Market

The relationship between the Cross-shareholdings of listed companies in China and its profitability

Cross-owners as monitors: more supervisory or distracted? Evidence from China

The long-run performance of initial public offerings and its determinants: the case of China

Corporate governance and its impact on financial performance and innovation in Chinese‐listed firms