Comparison of ~(99M)tc-Hl91 and ~(99M)tc-Mibi Imaging in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Chaosu Hu
IF: 4.501
2008-01-01
Journal of Oncology
Abstract:[Purpose] To compare the difference between imagings by Tc-99m-HL91 and Tc-99m-MIBI in nasopharyngeal carcinoma(NPC). [Methods] Twenty-four cases with NPC were immobilized with thermoplastic mask and underwent GE Hawkeye SPECT with 2.5mA X-ray after injection of Tc-99m-HL91 on Tc-99m-MIBI. Uptake of MIBI and HL91 by the primary tumor and metastatic nodes was assessed. Then tumor/collare muscle uptake ratio was calculated. Chi square test was used to compare the detection rate of both the primary tumor and metastatic node by the two radioactive tracers. And t test was used to compare the tumor/collare muscle uptake ratio. [Results] Twenty-four cases with primary tumor were detected by HL91, while only 20 cases were detected by MIBI (χ2=4.36,P=0.037). Of the 15 patients with nodal metastases, 14 were detected by HL91, and 10 were detected by MIBI(χ2=3.33,P=0.068). The mean primary tumor/collare muscle uptake ratio was 2.25±0.54 for HL91, and 2.02±0.81 for MIBI(t=3.46,P=0.001). The mean involved node/muscle uptake ratio was 2.44±0.30 and 1.92±0.69 for HL91 and MIBI, respectively(t=2.62, P=0.029). No statistical difference of HL91 uptake ratio was found between T1~2 and T3~4 disease or between N1 and N2~3 disease. Nor was MIBI uptake ratio. [Conclusions] 99mTc-HL91 is better than 99mTc-MIBI in detecting nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Neither HL91 nor MIBI uptake is affected by T staging or N staging.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?