The Absence of Origin--On ″supplement″ of Derrida and ″presence″ of Heidegger
陈晓明
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942x.2005.01.015
2005-01-01
Abstract:The unified thoughts of Nietzsche, Heidegger and Derrida is an essential precondition for postmodernism, in order to build a strong discourse of postmodernist, it is necessary to go back to deconstructionism, therefore we must to co-relate them internally at certain common topic, especially the relationship between Heidegger and Derrida is a key to go deep into the field of deconstruction. This paper shall try to explore Derrida's thoughts on ″the absence of origin″, in relation to Heidegger's views on (″Presence″), we can find that Derrida continues running a critical dialogue with Heidegger in the course of explaining his view. Since the word ″being″ had been filled fully by aftertime metaphysics, Heidegger was going to trace to its source and to find out the original situation of being in Greece thought. Heidegger think that the history of being origin from the situation of forget. He try to find out the foremost originality, he make out the original un-hide (Un-verborgenheit mit) from the thought of presence (Anwesen) of Greece, in which it is extence deposit in being situation, and it is being arouse the situation of existence. Heidegger, with his destruction of western metaphysics, of onto-theology, of the determination of ″Being as presence″, he needs to seek the truth of ″Being as presence″ in Greek thought. Derrida argues that this movement of play, instituted by ″the absence of an origin″, is the movement of ″Supplementary″ and ″Substitution″. The movement of rational history of western metaphysics went through a supplement of the absence of origin. According to Derrida, a historical origin can only be explained in the field of ″Difference″ and ″Supplement″. If supplement is substituted with the absence of originality, and the substitution which is impossible to be replace, that this suplement will breed substitution, by which it is endless process of difference. Therefore, ″supplement ″ conception is not only indicate deconstruction of originality of presence, moreover promise that exertion of strategy result in effect of deconstruction in discause practice.Apparently the explanation of Derrida is more to be inclined to literary context, the logic of philosophy has been changed into a literary rhetoric. The invention of origin has moved the truth into an activity of metaphor, the afterwards logical order has changed into the supplementary and substitution process of metaphor.