Abstract:Background Forkhead box, class O (FoxO) belongs to the large family of forkhead transcription factors that are characterized by a conserved forkhead box DNA-binding domain. To date, the FoxO group has four mammalian members: FoxO1, FoxO3a, FoxO4 and FoxO6, which are orthologs of DAF16, an insulin-responsive transcription factor involved in regulating longevity of worms and flies. The degree of homology between these four members is high, especially in the forkhead domain, which contains the DNA-binding interface. Yet, mouse FoxO knockouts have revealed that each FoxO gene has its unique role in the physiological process. Whether the functional divergences are primarily due to adaptive selection pressure or relaxed selective constraint remains an open question. As such, this study aims to address the evolutionary mode of FoxO, which may lead to the functional divergence. Results Sequence similarity searches have performed in genome and scaffold data to identify homologues of FoxO in vertebrates. Phylogenetic analysis was used to characterize the family evolutionary history by identifying two duplications early in vertebrate evolution. To determine the mode of evolution in vertebrates, we performed a rigorous statistical analysis with FoxO gene sequences, including relative rate ratio tests, branch-specific d N / d S ratio tests, site-specific d N / d S ratio tests, branch-site d N / d S ratio tests and clade level amino acid conservation/variation patterns analysis. Our results suggest that FoxO is constrained by strong purifying selection except four sites in FoxO6, which have undergone positive Darwinian selection. The functional divergence in this family is best explained by either relaxed purifying selection or positive selection. Conclusion We present a phylogeny describing the evolutionary history of the FoxO gene family and show that the genes have evolved through duplications followed by purifying selection except for four sites in FoxO6 fixed by positive selection lie mostly within the non-conserved optimal PKB motif in the C-terminal part. Relaxed selection may play important roles in the process of functional differentiation evolved through gene duplications as well.

Many Forks in the Path: Cycling with FoxO

FOXN Transcription Factors: Regulation and Significant Role in Cancer.

FOXN Transcription Factors: Regulation and Significant Role in Cancer

Dynamic FoxO transcription factors

FOXO Transcription Factors: Key Regulators of Cell Fate.

FOXO Transcription Factors: Their Clinical Significance and Regulation.

The Role of Forkhead Box Family in Bone Metabolism and Diseases

The emerging roles of forkhead box (Fox) proteins in cancer

Research Progress on the Role of FOXOs Family in Cancer

Forkhead box proteins: tuning forks for transcriptional harmony

FoxO gene family evolution in vertebrates

FOXO Transcription Factors: from Cell Fate Decisions to Regulation of Human Female Reproduction.

Advances in the FoxO Class of Transcription Factors

FOXO transcription factor family in cancer and metastasis

FOXO Signaling Pathways as Therapeutic Targets in Cancer

Mechanisms Controlling the Anti-Neoplastic Functions of FoxO Proteins.

Advances in the Researches of the Biological Function of Transcription Factors FOXOs

Regulation of FoxOs Transcription Factors on Body Metabolism

Tissue-Specific Metabolic Regulation of FOXO-Binding Protein: FOXO Does Not Act Alone

Crosstalk Between P53 and FOXO Transcription Factors.

FOXK Transcription Factors: Regulation and Critical Role in Cancer