Key Policy Options for a 21st Century International Investment Regime: Opportunities for G20 Collaboration

Mark Feldman

2016-01-01

Abstract:Remarks from ICTSD/IWEP Trade and Investment Workshop held concurrently with G20 Meeting in Nanjing, China.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

International Investment Obligations and Industrial Policy

Mark Feldman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3437158

2018-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:Remarks at Evolution of Investment Policymaking in RTAs and IIAs conference organized by the Inter-American Development Bank and the International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, held in Geneva, Switzerland in June 2018.
Reforming investor-state dispute settlement and promotion of trade and investment cooperation-G20 Insights

Loukas Mistelis,Faisal Alfadhel,Anton Asoskov,Crina Baltag,James Claxton,Mark Feldman,Roberto Castro de Figueiredo,Kabir Duggal,Sergio Puig,Giammarco Rao

2020-01-01

Abstract:This brief suggests that reducing fragmentation and enacting a multilateral or plurilateral investment agreement covering jurisdiction, substantive protection, and procedure, would increase investment and empower small and medium size enterprises (SMEs) to invest. Reforms must go beyond mere investment/investor protection to a more comprehensive set of objectives including sustainable development, dispute prevention, environmental protection, and protecting SME investments.
China and G20: From a Think Tank Case Perspective

Wen Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71955-9_3

2018-01-01

Abstract:The G20 has become the most important global governance institution. Since the global financial crisis of 2008, leaders from 20 major economies around the world met in Washington, DC to discuss how to deal with the crisis. Through coordinated cooperation, the G20 not only contributed to solving this crisis but also developed into a maturing institution in global economic and financial governance. In the annual G20 Summit, leaders from developed and developing countries can freely exchange their ideas regarding the most critical issues in global economy. The G20 plays an increasingly significant role in building a platform for coordinating different countries’ economic policy so that the global goal of economic growth can be realized.
GLOBAL VALUE CHAINS: CHALLENGES, OPPORTUNITIES, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY

Abstract:FOREWORD Meeting at the Saint Petersburg Summit in September 2013, the assembled leaders of the Group of Twenty noted " the importance of better understanding the rapid expansion of global value chains (GVCs) and impacts of participation in GVCs for growth, industrial structure, development and job creation. " Leaders welcomed the work done in 2013 by the OECD, the WTO, and the UNCTAD, and asked them " to seek the views of governments and continue their research on the impact of GVCs, particularly in relation to the influence of GVCs on trade, economic growth, development, job creation and distribution of value-added along GVCs. " Leaders also called on " the OECD in cooperation with the WTO and UNCTAD to deliver a report in the first half of 2014. " Subsequently, the OECD invited the World Bank Group to participate in this exercise. The present document, drawing upon the latest research, is submitted in fulfilment of that mandate. The rise of GVCs has produced a new " trade-investment-services-know-how nexus, " or the intertwining of trade in intermediates, the movement of capital and ideas, and demand for services to coordinate the dispersed production and distribution of goods and services. As such, GVCs are becoming increasingly influential in determining future trade and FDI patterns, as well as growth opportunities. Policy needs to respond to this new reality and promote a business environment that not only makes a country attractive for location of GVCs, but also facilitates upgrading opportunities over time. The analysis stresses that GVCs do not respond to piecemeal approaches to policy change. A " whole-of the-supply-chain " approach is needed. Some of these policies are horizontal in nature: good infrastructure and connectivity, a business-friendly environment, flexible labour markets, access to credit, innovation and macroeconomic stability. Other policies are more targeted, such as tariffs and other trade restrictions, subsidies, local-content or export-performance requirements, and restrictions on foreign exchange. This report, together with discussions during the G20 Australian Presidency-OECD Stocktaking Seminar on GVCs that was held in Paris on 5 May 2014, highlights the following priority actions for G20 governments:  Implement and ratify the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement as quickly as possible. G20 governments should consider implementing TF measures – such as streamlining customs procedures – even before the ratification process is finalised at the WTO. Developed countries should provide support, where possible, to developing countries as they make trade facilitation commitments …

Business,Political Science,Economics
China and Global ICT standardisation and innovation

Robin Williams,Ian Graham,Kai Jakobs,Kalle Lyytinen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2011.592265

2011-08-01

Technology Analysis and Strategic Management

Abstract:The People’s Republic of China has become remarkably active in the development of interoperability standards across many areas of information and communications technology (ICT). Such standards are crucial for the creation of new industries and markets for novel ICT products and services. This engagement in standardisation is linked to the Chinese government’s strategy to develop indigenous technologies and, in some cases through involvement in international standardisation bodies, to put China at the heart of the next generation of global technological infrastructures. In this way China seeks to go beyond its globally competitive productive capabilities to acquire technology innovation capabilities. This strategy throws up important issues for China’s technology promotion policy in terms of how to contribute to standardisation processes and of how to exploit public sector research and development. China’s involvement in the shaping of these globally significant technologies will have far reaching consequences for developed economies and global ICT markets, posing challenges for industrial strategy and innovation policies across the developed and developing world. The USA has tended to see China’s search for indigenous technologies as potentially damaging to free trade and competition. In contrast the European Union (EU) has responded by seeking to align China’s indigenous ICT innovation policies with the European Research Area. However the globalisation of innovation signalled by these developments, based upon complex matrices of intellectual property, innovative capability and market knowledge from a wide array of industrial and research players across the world, calls into question simplistic established conceptions of ‘indigenous’ technologies. These developments thus raise a number of issues – which are explored in relation to various examples of ICT standardisation and innovation.

management
Will They Have Table Manners? the G20, Emerging Powers and Global Responsibility

Jorge Heine

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461003763825

2010-01-01

Abstract:The creation of the G20 at leaders' level has signalled a major shift in North-South relations. Although the immediate cause for its launch was the global financial crisis of 2008, the underlying reasons relate to the existing global governance gap. Whereas globalisation - the flow of goods, services, capital, data and cultural products across national borders - has increased exponentially over the past two decades, rules and regulations governing it have lagged behind. This is also true of international institutions dealing with global governance, like the UN and the international financial institutions. A soft-law, informal group like the G20 at finance ministers' level, created in 1999, provided an ideal launching pad for a more ambitious and capacious entity that could take on the challenges of globalisation at the highest levels. Having held three meetings in 10 months and seemingly poised to replace the G7/8 (for economic governance purposes), the G20 seems well positioned to become institutionalised. Two key questions arise: what will it take to make it fully operational and what will be the role played by the key emerging powers in it?
The Emerging Harmonization of the International Investment Law Regime

Mark Feldman

2015-01-01

Abstract:Two key developments are contributing to the harmonization of the international investment law regime. First, a set of major agreements (TTIP, TPP, RCEP, US-China BIT, EU-China BIT) is being negotiated by many of the world's largest economies, which, if completed, will cover a very significant share of global investment. Second, given the recent treaty practice of the States participating in those negotiations, that set of major agreements likely would reflect an emerging consensus on many key 21st century investment law issues.
Pivot to Internet Plus: Molding China'S Digital Economy for Economic Restructuring?

Yu Hong

2017-01-01

International Journal of Communication

Abstract:Under the Internet Plus policy, China’s Internet and digital economy become unprecedentedly important during the post-2008 economic restructuring. Using the Internet as a metaphor to represent the broader Web-oriented communications commodity chains that encompass access devices, networks, and services and applications, and by examining three state–corporate disputes involving Foxconn, Qualcomm, and Alibaba, this article historicizes the political economy of China’s digital economy, especially the liberalized and quasiliberalized sections, and then characterizes the nature of the state’s interventions under the auspices of economic restructuring. It argues that the state’s ability to make effective policy for change in this critical field is incoherent. The combination of state-power decentralization and the externally oriented commodity chain for the Web economy is likely to turn Internet Plus into a risky strategy, but the cyber business section of China’s digital capitalism is most likely to benefit.
China's public international investment: A strategic-trade-policy perspective

Kai A. Konrad

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2024.106781

IF: 4.7

2024-06-06

Economic Modelling

Abstract:Initiatives such as the Belt and Road initiative reduce trade costs, increase export firms' profits and stimulate their activities in R&D contests. The resulting strategic-trade policy equilibria tend to be asymmetric. One country earns leadership in the markets for exports to the rest of the world. Factors that are conducive for a country to gain the role of major innovator and exporter nation are: (1) whether a nation follows a 'national champions' policy compared to a rigorous national anti-trust policy, (2) whether a nation has a large pre-existing export sector, (3) whether the government places a high welfare weight on the profits of the firms in its country, and (4) whether the government has low opportunity costs of such investment policies. Piecemeal evidence suggests that, compared to the US, China has the advantages in all these four dimensions.

economics
China-Africa Investment Treaties and Dispute Settlement: A Piece of the Multipolar Puzzle

Won Kidane,Huiping Chen,Mark Feldman

2013-01-01

Abstract:This panel was convened at 10:45 am, Friday, April 5, by its moderator, Wenhua Shan of Xi'an Jiaotong University, who introduced the panelists: Chen Fuli of the Ministry of Commerce, Embassy of China; Chen Huiping of the School of Law, Xiamen University; Mark Feldman of Peking University School of Transnational Law; and Won Kidane of Seattle University School of Law. * * Chen Fuli did not submit remarks for the Proceedings. REFLECTIONS ON CHINA-AFRICA BITS By Won Kidane ([dagger]) BACKGROUND The rise in the last decade of Chinese investment in Africa (1) continues to be a subject of curiosity. (2) Traditionally, the bulk of foreign investment flew North-South but rarely SouthSouth. (3) This is changing as China becomes an important player as a sender of foreign direct investment (FDI). In the 21st century, international investment agreements (IIAs), particularly bilateral investment treaties (BITs), have become the principal means of protection of foreign investment. (4) These investment treaties themselves lie along a spectrum representing the balance of power of their own era. Much like U.S. BITs, China's BITs are said to have gone through at least three generational modifications. (5) China has employed all three generations to protect its investment in Africa. Do China's BITs tell a story of a nation's rapid transformation from a recipient of FDI to a sender of FDI? Or do they paint a more complicated picture? China's approach to investment in Africa appears to be different from the approaches that Africa's traditional partners from Europe and North America have taken over the years. A 2010 UNCTAD report describes such difference in the following terms: [I]n contrast to Africa's relationship with traditional partners, the new partnerships ... often have established forums and dialogue platforms and are generally supported by frequent high-level official visits. Furthermore, they are based on the principle of noninterference in the internal affairs of partner countries. Consequently, they are not associated with policy conditionality as has been the case in relations with traditional partners. (6) The report states further that "[the] big Southern partners [mainly China] generally use official flows to promote trade and investment activities in Africa. Furthermore, Southern partners do not consider their financial contributions to other developing countries as aid. Rather they describe them as 'expressions of solidarity and cooperation borne out of shared experiences and sympathies.'" (7) Although the role of China's involvement in Africa remains a subject of great controversy and heated debate, (8) it is clear that Africa's recent and unprecedented growth is not entirely unrelated to Chinese investment and trade. (9) Be that as it may, China's economic interest in Africa is not all that different from Africa's traditional partners. Its means of pursuing the economic goals are also similar--although as Ambassador David Shinn puts it--China employs different tactics that might make it more acceptable to Africa. In his own words: [T]he United States and China use essentially the same political economic, military and cultural tools for implementing their relations with Africa. The emphasis the two sides place on these tactics, however, and the way they implement policy varies considerably. China presents itself more humbly in its interaction with Africa. Having served as the leader of the Western world since the end of the Second World War and the only superpower since the end of the Cold War, the United States often comes across in Africa as insensitive ... (10) The current China-Africa economic engagement is undoubtedly full of benefits and risks (11) arguably to both sides. The legal infrastructure for the management of such risks is in a state of development. …
Moderating effect of digital governance and eco-policy stringency in realizing natural resources-growth nexus: Role of financial development and FDI in G20 countries

Guangyuan Ding,Yunbiao Xiong,Yashu Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104976

IF: 8.222

2024-04-24

Resources Policy

Abstract:Digital governance expedites its benefits in technology-based advanced countries, particularly in developed nations. Due to higher competitiveness, foreign direct investments (FDI) augment economic prosperity. However, most economies are highly volatile due to the resource-curse paradox. Given this, our study scrutinizes the influence of e-governance, FDI, mineral resources, and environmental regulations on economic growth of G20 countries from 2010 to 2022. Generalized method of moment (GMM) is employed to encounter endogeneity and reverse causality. The outcomes reveal that digital governance, FDI, and environmental regulations facilitate economic growth, while natural resources discourage economic growth and affirm the resource-curse problem. This research also assesses how environmental regulation and digital governance divert the resource curse. Through moderating impact, it exhibits that e-governance and environmental regulations are crucial to stimulating economic growth. Feasible generalized least squares also endorse similar results. The Granger causality test indicates a bidirectional causality among all model variables and offers valuable policy implications.

environmental studies
The Group of 20 transnational policy community: governance networks, policy analysis and think tanks

Diane Stone

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314558035

IF: 2.397

2015-04-20

International Review of Administrative Sciences

Abstract:The G20 is an evolving international institution. Aided by both advances in information technology and support from home governments, a number of knowledge actors and networks seek to influence global economic governance with policy analysis and advice. This article assesses the international G20 think tank network called Think20 and the policy advocacy of private research institutes (such the Lowy Institute in Australia and the Centre for International Governance and Innovation in Canada) which are in the orbit of the G20 policy community. Think20 assists the global economic governance processes of the G20 by developing ‘coordinative discourses’ for policy development and implementation. Points for practitioners Ideas matter but ideas that imply major policy reform and innovation need to be made to matter if they are to direct government action. Networks provide one mechanism to broadcast and disseminate ‘communicative discourses’ to many different publics – local as well as global – and the infrastructure to crystalize and amplify ‘coordinative discourses’ underpinning the policy blueprints and reform proposals of governments that must motivate their own bureaucracies as well as collaborate with foreign government. This article discusses some of the network tools and practices for consensus building in ‘transnational policy communities’ that cultivate global policy coordination.

public administration
G20 Institutional Transition and Global Tax Governance

Jiejin Zhu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2016.1154687

2016-01-01

Abstract:The G20 is in transition from a short-term crisis institution to long-term steering institution, adopting a new G20 + established international organization' governance approach. In this approach, the main role of the G20 is to set the agenda and build political consensus for global economic governance. The established international organization provides the technical support and facilitates proposal implementation, while the precondition for the G20 institutional transition is that the emerging economies need to participate on an equal footing with the advanced economies. The case of global tax governance is among the few success stories of the G20's institutional transition. Within the G20 + OECD' governance architecture, the G20 builds the political consensus that the profits should be taxed where they are performed, while the OECD proposes the technical Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Action Plan. In this way, the G20's political leadership and the OECD's technical advantage complement each other, making a giant leap in global tax governance.
China’s Global Economic Interactions

Barry Naughton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190062316.003.0006

2020-01-01

Abstract:Since 2009–2010, China has developed a distinctive set of international economic policies that were by no means inevitable. These policies grew out of the unusual economic events that marked the first part of the twenty-first century—including the Global Financial Crisis (GFC)—and from the determination the Chinese leaders displayed thereafter to exert worldwide global economic influence. The broad policy orientation that grew from these forces can be best considered by examining two complex policy initiatives: renminbi internationalization and the Belt and Road Initiative. Each can be seen as a response to the surplus of domestic saving that emerged in the wake of sustained rapid economic growth, and they are to a certain extent competing strategies. The chapter also assesses China’s overall international economic position as of 2018. It concludes with some prognostications about the future of China’s position in the global economy.
Emerging Regulation for the Digital Economy: Challenges and Opportunities for Multilateral Global Governance

Marina Larionova,Andrei Shelepov,,,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2021-01-02

2021-06-01

International Organisations Research Journal

Abstract:The role of information and communications technology (ICT), high-speed communication infrastructure, digital content and the digital economy is expected to grow in the post-pandemic society. Simultaneously, competition for digital technologies and solutions and the contest to influence norms, standards and regulatory mechanisms is escalating. The new regulatory mechanisms and approaches are concurrently being shaped in the key international institutions, including the United Nations (UN), the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the World Trade Organization (WTO), the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), the European Union (EU), the Group of 20 (G20) and the BRICS group of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. This article presents analysis of the current cooperation on issues of digital economy regulation within the main international institutions. The study aims to assess the influence of the existing and emerging regulatory mechanisms on the balance of power between the key international actors. This assessment of the emerging mechanisms’ impact on the balance of power among international actors indicates that advantages and leverage capabilities accruing from them are distributed unevenly. The advanced members of the OECD and the G20 gain significant advantages, and there is a risk that the new mechanisms will consolidate the balance of power embodied by the Bretton Woods system, which has successfully resisted decades-long endeavors for its reform. However, regulation of the digital economy is not yet built as an established order. A window of opportunity was opened in 2020, not only to implement the G20’s 2008 pledge to reform the international financial and economic architecture, but also to build a new digital economy governance system, ensuring thatemerging markets and developing countries have a voice in decision-making commensurate with their weight in the global economy. The article is structured in three parts. The introduction presents the research questions and objectives and describes the parameters of comparative analysis and influence assessment criteria. The second section reviews the emerging mechanisms and instruments and reflects on their influence on the balance of power. The third section puts forward conclusions and recommendations for enhancing the influence of emerging markets and developing countries on the shaping and functioning of the emerging digital economy’s regulatory mechanisms.
The New International Trade Pattern and the Global Trade Governance

Yu Jinping

2012-01-01

Abstract:The mode of global trade governance is urgently needed to be adjusted with the development of economic globalization and changes of international trade pattern.The world's major trading nations,especially the United States and the emerging economies represented by China should be mutually inclusive to undertake the responsibility of global trade governance based on the global perspective.It is helpful to promote the development of global trade by various models of global trade governance,and G20 will play a negotiation role in dealing with major global economic issues and a leading role in the reform of WTO.
The US-China Relationship in the 20s

Mark Feldman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3716603

2020-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:Remarks prepared for panel discussion on US-China Relations: Challenges and Opportunities, organized by the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre as part of the 2020 ADR in Asia Conference.
Multinational Enterprises and Investment Treaties

Mark Feldman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2895680

2017-01-01

Abstract:Over the past few decades, a few thousand international investment agreements have been concluded. One cornerstone of those treaties has been a straightforward model of foreign investment: an investor based in a home State that has made an investment located in the territory of a host State. Under that model, treaty protections operate reciprocally, protecting the investments of each treaty party’s nationals made in the territory of another treaty party.The foreign investment model on which investment treaties have been based — and which, in turn, supports the reciprocal structure of the treaties — often does not capture current economic reality. Foreign investments by multinational enterprises today routinely involve multiple jurisdictions in which inputs are traded (as part of international production networks known as global or regional value chains) and through which capital is channeled (as transit investment).The reliance by multinational enterprises on international production networks and transit investment has challenged the reciprocal foundation of investment treaties. This article responds to that risk by developing strategies for policymakers and decision-makers to preserve the reciprocal foundation of investment treaties in a 21st century global economy.
Navigating Global Economic Dynamics: Institutional Innovation and Rule of Law in China's Pilot Free Trade Zones

Yang Weng,Wanqiang Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01783-6

IF: 1.815

2024-02-29

Journal of the Knowledge Economy

Abstract:In the aftermath of the 2008 international financial crisis and amidst a backdrop of escalating trade protectionism and anti-globalization sentiments, China embarked on a strategic journey to vigorously develop Free Trade Zones (FTZs). Positioned as a critical initiative to counter the deteriorating global economic landscape, this research delves into the underlying principles and motivations that drove China's commitment to FTZs. With 21 established FTZs and a Free Trade Port (FTP) strategically spanning regions across China, the FTZ system has served as an experimental ground for opening up China's investment and legal systems to the global arena. However, as FTZs progress, conflicts with existing laws and the imperative for system innovation become apparent. This study underscores the paramount challenge of balancing the rule of law with deepening reforms and international economic and trade rules within FTZs. By adopting an interdisciplinary approach that encompasses legal, economic, and geopolitical dimensions, this research provides a comprehensive examination of these complexities. The study identifies the significance of aligning negative list management systems with international standards and proposes strategies, including the introduction of a "China Free Trade Zone Law" and the establishment of FTZ courts, to address challenges and enhance the legal robustness of FTZs. In a broader context, this research contributes to a nuanced understanding of the intricate dynamics enveloping FTZs and their pivotal role in addressing contemporary global economic challenges. It offers theoretical insights into institutional innovation within the context of FTZs and provides practical guidance for policymakers and stakeholders navigating the evolving landscape of global economic governance. China's FTZs emerge as crucial instruments for economic growth, reform, and international integration in an era marked by multifaceted challenges and opportunities in the knowledge economy.

economics
China 5G: Opportunities and Challenges

Jun Xia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102295

IF: 4.497

2022-03-01

Telecommunications Policy

Abstract:China has become a forerunner in the global ICT ecosystem since a catching-up policy was adopted more than two decades ago. Breaking technology dependence has been a focal point over the course of the development. Before the Sino-US trade tensions began in 2018, Chinese telecom companies had been poised to take leadership in the emerging 5G industry. Now, both China and its Western counterpartsface opportunities and challenges. This special edition is aimed to encourage and integrate academic inquiries into related theoretical and policy issues.

information science & library science,communication,telecommunications

Key Policy Options for a 21st Century International Investment Regime: Opportunities for G20 Collaboration

International Investment Obligations and Industrial Policy

Reforming investor-state dispute settlement and promotion of trade and investment cooperation-G20 Insights

China and G20: From a Think Tank Case Perspective

GLOBAL VALUE CHAINS: CHALLENGES, OPPORTUNITIES, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY

China and Global ICT standardisation and innovation

Will They Have Table Manners? the G20, Emerging Powers and Global Responsibility

The Emerging Harmonization of the International Investment Law Regime

Pivot to Internet Plus: Molding China'S Digital Economy for Economic Restructuring?

China's public international investment: A strategic-trade-policy perspective

China-Africa Investment Treaties and Dispute Settlement: A Piece of the Multipolar Puzzle

Moderating effect of digital governance and eco-policy stringency in realizing natural resources-growth nexus: Role of financial development and FDI in G20 countries

The Group of 20 transnational policy community: governance networks, policy analysis and think tanks

G20 Institutional Transition and Global Tax Governance

China’s Global Economic Interactions

Emerging Regulation for the Digital Economy: Challenges and Opportunities for Multilateral Global Governance

The New International Trade Pattern and the Global Trade Governance

The US-China Relationship in the 20s

Multinational Enterprises and Investment Treaties

Navigating Global Economic Dynamics: Institutional Innovation and Rule of Law in China's Pilot Free Trade Zones

China 5G: Opportunities and Challenges