Determination from Well Logs of Porosity and Permeability in a Heterogeneous Reservoir

Jing Lin,Henry A. Salisch
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2523/28792-ms
1994-01-01
Abstract:Determination From Well Logs of Porosity and Permeability in a Heterogeneous Reservoir Jing Long Lin; Jing Long Lin Daqing Petroleum Inst. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar H.A. Salisch H.A. Salisch U. of New South Wales Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference, Melbourne, Australia, November 1994. Paper Number: SPE-28792-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/28792-MS Published: November 07 1994 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Lin, Jing Long, and H.A. Salisch. "Determination From Well Logs of Porosity and Permeability in a Heterogeneous Reservoir." Paper presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference, Melbourne, Australia, November 1994. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/28792-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition Search Advanced Search AbstractA technique has been developed for the petrophysical evaluation of well logs from lithologically complex sandstone reservoirs located in the Barrow Sub-basin in Western Australia. The reservoirs are sands or fairly high porosity and low permeability with a significant amount of clay minerals, among them glauconite.Principal component and cluster analysis were applied to classify the electric facies associated with lithofacies. Bayes discriminant analysis was used to identify several lithofacies in the reservoirs. The different lithofacies are characterised by distinct relationships between porosity and acoustic interval transit times as well as between porosity and permeability. This paper presents mathematical models for each lithofacies for the determination of porosity and permeability from well logs.IntroductionPorosity and permeability are important parameters in the evaluation of reservoirs. Reservoir evaluation generally includes their identification, the determination of petrophysical parameters and the study of their economic significance. This paper discuses the methodology to determine porosities and permeabilities in lithologically complex sandstone reservoirs in the Barrow Sub-basin in Western Australia. The reservoirs described in this study are of a complex and widely varying geological and lithological composition with depth. Nine stratigraphic layers can be recognised from core descriptions, each layer separated by impermeable carbonate-cemented sands. Log characteristics make it possible to identify five distinct lithofacies. The argillaceous sandstones contains, on average, about 48 percent clay, some of which, mainly glauconite, was deposited as framework grains. Glauconite, kaolinite and chlorite are the main clay minerals. The distribution of the clay minerals in the reservoirs occurs in three mainmodes: structural, laminated and dispersedThe objective of this study was to develop a technique for the evaluation from well logs of heterogeneous reservoirs of the type described above. Three key wells were selected as pilot wells. An important criteria in their selection was the fact that they had reasonably complete logging suites for the proposed interpretation technique. The wells will be called here wells A, B and C.The following logs were available for the three wells:–Resistivity logs [Dual Laterologs]–Sonic logs [BHC]–Formation Density/Neutron logs [LDT/CNL]–Spontaneous Potential curve–Conventional Gamma Ray logs–Caliper curvesIn this study the evaluation or the heterogeneous reservoirs from well logs was based on grouping the reservoirs into five distinct lithofacies, based on log responses and geological characteristics. They are, from top to bottom:P. 495^ Keywords: artificial intelligence, reservoir, facies 2, correlation, porosity, upstream oil & gas, facies 3, log analysis, evaluation, clay mineral Subjects: Formation Evaluation & Management, Open hole/cased hole log analysis This content is only available via PDF. 1994. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?