Abstract:Rapid increase of seismic data poses challenges to seismic data processing, in which phase-picking is a crucial procedure and accordingly attracts attention from seismologists. Among the breakthroughs in deep learning methods for seismic data processing, seismologists have especially proposed many seismic phase-picking methods based on deep learning, which have shown much better accuracy than traditional automatic phase-picking methods. However, further improvements are needed to meet the requirements for processing continuous seismic records. Here we propose a new approach combining seismic array scheme and U-Net, an end-to-end neural network developed in image segmentation. Previous studies have shown that U-Net can classify waveforms and determine the onset of seismic phases accurately with the help of contracting and expanding paths. Based on U-Net, we first design a deep learning phase picker (PP) model with a long (40 s) time window. To avoid difficulties in time window selection and interference between P- and S-phase identifications, the model involves two networks with the same structure, which pick the P and S phases separately. To improve model training, we employ data transformation to expand the sample set, add typical noises to the sample set for better resemblance of real data, and slightly increase the weight of the seismic signal containing seismic records for a better balance between precision and recall. We also adopt a more effective array-assisted phase picker (APP) model which correlates the picking results from different stations to minimize misidentification. Using data from Hi-net and Alibaba Aftershock AI Capture Contest, we design training and test sets of different sizes to examine the performance and generalization ability of the model. Results show that the APP can effectively pick the body-wave phases on continuous records with a good generalization ability. The relationship between the model performance and training set is such that the model performance is directly related to the data quality rather than the size of the training set, and there is no serious overfitting even for a small training set. Statistics further show that the model has no special requirements for the locations of time windows and can handle seismic records with large epicentral distances. By comparison with other models (model with short time windows or the one of simultaneous picking of P- and S-phases), we find that APP can successfully process event-crowded waveform data and effectively reduce the influence of noise. Finally, we apply the trained model to a seismic network in the Inner Mongolia. Results show that the number of earthquakes detected by the APP is 30 times the manually-detected one, and that 98.1% of the events in the catalog are detected by the APP. The successful application to a seismic network different from the training set suggests that the APP is robust and has strong generalization ability.

Time Series Segmentation Clustering: A New Method for S-Phase Picking in Microseismic Data

Adaptive and Automatic P-and S-phase Pickers Based on Frequency Spectrum Variation of Sliding Time Windows

Active Source Seismic Identification and Automatic Picking of the P ̄wave First Arrival Using a Convolutional Neural Network 1

Arrival Picking Method for Microseismic Phases Based on Curve Fitting

Automatic Microseismic Event Picking Via Unsupervised Machine Learning

Automatic Microseismic Event Detection and Arrival Picking Based on Waveform Cross-Correlation

Earthquake detection and automatic phase picking

Using Fuzzy C-Means Clustering to Determine First Arrival of Microseismic Recordings

Self-Supervised Convolutional Clustering for Picking the First Break of Microseismic Recording

A Machine Learning-enhanced Robust P-Phase Picker for Real-time Seismic Monitoring

Integrating Data-Driven Segmentation, Local Feature Extraction and Fisher Kernel Encoding to Improve Time Series Classification

Automatic First Arrival Time Identification Using Fuzzy C -Means and AIC

Automatic Time Picking for Weak Seismic Phase in the Strong Noise and Interference Environment: An Hybrid Method Based on Array Similarity

Improved Methods for Detection and Arrival Picking of Microseismic Events with Low Signal-to-noise Ratios

A combined method for automatic microseismic event detection and arrival picking

Semiautomatic First-Arrival Picking of Microseismic Events by Using the Pixel-Wise Convolutional Image Segmentation Method

Semi-Picking: A semi-supervised arrival time picking for microseismic monitoring based on the TransUGA network combined with SimMatch

Automatic phase detection and arrival picking for microseismic events in hydraulic fracturing based on machine learning and array correlation

Research on the Initial Arrival Recognition and Judgment Method of Microseismic Signals Based on PELT

Arrival picking of microseismic events using the SLPEA algorithm

An Array-Assisted Deep Learning Approach to Seismic Phase-Picking